Anonymous
8/7/2025, 11:28:18 PM No.213579334
>o-only rootless new worlders identify as white
?
?
Replies:
Thread 213579334 - /int/ [Archived: 82 hours ago]
Anonymous
8/7/2025, 11:31:10 PM No.213579409
>>213579334 (OP)
He was talking about the Whites Political Party, they were like the Ghibellines
He was talking about the Whites Political Party, they were like the Ghibellines
Anonymous
8/7/2025, 11:40:44 PM No.213579678
>>213579385
Imagine him getting laughed out today
Imagine him getting laughed out today
Anonymous
8/7/2025, 11:42:26 PM No.213579727
Replies:
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 12:07:06 AM No.213580314
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 12:08:01 AM No.213580337
>>213579727
He came from Corsican nobility. Though many would consider the term "Corsican Nobility" an oxymoron.
He came from Corsican nobility. Though many would consider the term "Corsican Nobility" an oxymoron.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 12:48:22 AM No.213581320
>>213579727
does "Buonaparte" sound french to you
does "Buonaparte" sound french to you
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 12:55:16 AM No.213581466
>>213579334 (OP)
>France’s seemingly eternal on-again, off-again war with Great Britain did not change the immediate boundaries of either country. These wars were often fought over land in the American hemisphere and included a historic contest over Martinique, a small island in the Caribbean, whose fate had far-reaching repercussions for slavery.
>In 1794, following three years of slave rebellions in Saint-Domingue – events now known as the Haitian Revolution – the French government abolished slavery in all French overseas territories.
>Martinique, however, was not included: The French had recently lost the island to the British in battle.
>In a 1799 speech to the French government, Bonaparte explained that if he had been in Martinique at the time the French lost the colony, he would have been on the side of the British – because they never dared to abolish slavery. “I am for the whites, because I am white,” Bonaparte said. “I have no other reason, and this is the right one. How could anyone have granted freedom to Africans, to men who had no civilization.”
So, the quote is in the context of losing a French colony to (black) rebels. I would say, he is an Imperialist more than a racist.
>France’s seemingly eternal on-again, off-again war with Great Britain did not change the immediate boundaries of either country. These wars were often fought over land in the American hemisphere and included a historic contest over Martinique, a small island in the Caribbean, whose fate had far-reaching repercussions for slavery.
>In 1794, following three years of slave rebellions in Saint-Domingue – events now known as the Haitian Revolution – the French government abolished slavery in all French overseas territories.
>Martinique, however, was not included: The French had recently lost the island to the British in battle.
>In a 1799 speech to the French government, Bonaparte explained that if he had been in Martinique at the time the French lost the colony, he would have been on the side of the British – because they never dared to abolish slavery. “I am for the whites, because I am white,” Bonaparte said. “I have no other reason, and this is the right one. How could anyone have granted freedom to Africans, to men who had no civilization.”
So, the quote is in the context of losing a French colony to (black) rebels. I would say, he is an Imperialist more than a racist.
Replies:
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 1:07:38 AM No.213581709
>>213581466
>he is an Imperialist more than a racist.
He's both or at least at best an imperialist stupid enough to listen to slave owning lobbyists and politicians and try to re-enslave an island that had slavery banned decades ago by the government in France.
>he is an Imperialist more than a racist.
He's both or at least at best an imperialist stupid enough to listen to slave owning lobbyists and politicians and try to re-enslave an island that had slavery banned decades ago by the government in France.
Anonymous
8/8/2025, 1:27:45 AM No.213582110
We must secure the existence of our people and a future for white children