>>213684692
> it only harms zoomoids and millenialoids who will bear the burden of the aging populace
... and everyone who comes after until birth rates become sustainable again
>>213684700
>It'll sort itself out eventually
Terrible attitude for what is, at the very least, a symptom of a major crisis in living standards, and at worst is an existential threat to our societies. Your whole post sounds like pure cope, sorry:
>Soon they'll be so few people that quality of life will improve
non sequitur
>Combine it with tech advancement and eventual government action and you'll see it reverse.
Maybe, maybe, maybe. You're presenting an extremely optimistic scenario as if it's a given, as if we'll roll sixes every time. We need to be more proactive, not passive, and action starts by being worried, or angry, or feeling anything rather than taking it all for granted.