Thread 213774257

They should become a constitutional monarchy like England or Denmark.

>>213774257 (OP)
Hell no. That's against New Worldism.

>>213774416
Societies work better under constitutional monarchies
They prevent the rise of political extremism, and guarantee long time project continuity

It should be an anarcho-fascist monarchy with autonomist direct voting council communes

forgot to activate your VPN bro

>>213774257 (OP)
monarchies in constitutional monarchies are a side-effect of peaceful transition towards liberal democracy, what would adding a power-less monarchy after the fact add?
you faggots seem to be living in this double speak subjective facts world where words don't have meanings and you only speak in slogans.

>>213774476
No they don't. There's no evidence constitutional monarchies do any better than normal constitutional republics except tax payers pay a bit of extra money to the monarchs and the authority to rule comes from some random retard rather than the people

>>213774592
brazil's monarchy wasnt powerless thoughbeit. government had four branches where the king was the moderator who did it for free.

This should be a one-party communist state. The Brazilian space station would already in orbit by now.

>>213774610
>from some random retard rather than the people
>the people
lol

It would be a dream. Imagine Brazil withouta politically polarised society, having a king and a congress ballancing each others powers, having long term projects continuity, having a king would prevent both socialism and fascism, bc he could depose of the prime minister if he disrespects the constitution. I’ve been to UK, Denmark, Belgium, Sweden and their spices ties are wonderful, and part of that is bc of their monarchies.

>>213774645
>de-facto powerless
happy now?

>>213774690
>Uh... I don't want any heckin' political power we should vest it in a random guy who passes it to his son o algo

>>213774694
No monarchy is powerless.
They are literally the armed forces supreme commanders and can depose of prime ministers if they judge they disrespected the constitution.

>>213774694
Saudi Arabia is monarchy and is relatively developed same for UAE

>>213774808
you were arguing for constitutional monarchy, implying that its monarchy is a unique feature that improves it and not simply a side-effect of the transition of power, saudi arabia is an absolute monarchy which you didn't advocate for, different topics.

>>213774761
Yes unironically. There isnt a single democracy that wasnt also an oligarchy. Having an inbred retard with power will always cause some level of attrition and even split them into factions. Unlike in yew es ay or brazil will they get loot every thing with no restraints

>>213774899
>There isnt a single democracy that wasnt also an oligarchy.
Aren't you advocating for a democracy? You realize England and Denmark are democracies lol
>Da power is so concentrated because of da lobbyists!!!!
And monarchy helps stop the concentration of power how?

>>213774592
>you faggots seem to be living in this double speak subjective facts world where words don't have meanings and you only speak in slogans.
you described brazilian monarchists perfectly:
they're retards who want a cool guy with a crown because it's cool and will change their opinions based on what the person they are arguing with believes so they can try to appease them.
just so happens that a constitutional monarchy is the least offensive option so that's what they default to, but if the person is more authoritarian they switch their rhetoric and aesthetics to le based trad prussian semi-absolute monarchy with powers o algo.

>>213774999
>Aren't you advocating for a democracy? You realize England and Denmark are democracies lol
no thats the other guy. Im in favor of concentration of power. better an autocracy than an oligarchy. Compare the near eastern civilization to greece and rome.

Mesopotamia/Babylon's divine kings could easily cancel debts and force property redistribution. In Rome and Greece the citizens gradually lost land, tools, slaves to their upper classes since they were also the creditors, eventually polarizing their economies and civic life

>>213774257 (OP)
well, that chance is gone

Interesting they nonetheless held a referendum about it in the 90s

>>213775658
Democracies have produced the best societies to live in by far. Why the fuck would I want to live under Oriental barbarism

>>213775423
I like Habsburgs, and also Pedro II, but desu its good were a Republic today, all the other monarchies are just circuses while elected officials plunge their countries into chaos they dont do shit, looking at Charles III in the UK or King Willem of the Netherlands

>>213775658
its 2025 ad, not 3.000 bc. also mesopotamian societies were pretty violent, whereas modern western society is about the rule of law