Thread 213786520

Notice the higher up you go, the more first-world it gets

>>213786520 (OP)
wtf I love south korea now!

>>213786520 (OP)
Good times create weak men or however the Roman empire falls.

Based and gaypilled

>>213786520 (OP)
gayhater are all shithole.

how can anyone love gays more than us?

>>213786520 (OP)
my homophobia only grows stronger

HAHA how is this a graph?? its literally imposible to know

its crazy that i have been alive for 33 years and never has any researcher called my phone, stopped me on the street, or sent me an email asking me my opinion of gays, what my favourite fruit is, how many times i have diarrhea per week or what i think of israel
considering how many fucking of these charts exists and that i live in a country with only 10 million people that always feature on them it seems unlikely that it hasnt happened to me hmmm

>>213786520 (OP)
>Chile and Japan dropped 47 and 54 points
Wild

>>213787005
The recent Pew "survey" kind of convinced these are probably cooked, as the results for Spain are completely fake

>>213787059
i wouldn't be surprised if these surveys are ordered by organisations like the UN to sway public opinion
retards will see that the attitude of their countrymen is changing on a topic and because humans are social herd animals they will adjust their own position to match

>>213786520 (OP)
I've never given a fuck about gay people and I never will.
I'm hetero, and literally, if some guy chooses to give his ass, it doesn't affect my life in any way.

>>213787135
You can get any result you want on any subject on an ordered poll.
Politicians do it all the time

>>213787005
Really? I get almost monthly letters from SCB telling me to do some retarded survey and multiple follow-up letters reminding me to do the surveys. They even offer stuff like 2 Trisslotter but I ignore it on principle.

>>213787005
Because most of these polls aren't selecting random people but a pool of people that have consented to being surveyed, which is why results may be skewed

>>213787005
>>213787603
most social survey agencies work like this. they get the critical mass(statistically reliable) of people for any given population to get a margin of trust ¬90%. might be like a couple of thousand people for sweden. and then they stick with that. asking the same questions from the same people. methodically it works, but desu it isn't representative of the general populace. imc no one seems to care about it. probably the same in yours.