>>213802650
>its not phenotypically European
>posts haplogroup map
uhhhhhh
EHG was Phenotypically European. ANE was phenotypically European.
Sunghir (proto-ANE) literally came from Europe 30kya and was Phenotypically European.
Tianyuan was some Jomon looking guy and made up less than 20% of the ANE genome.
seething ricecel
>ANE is from 1923
Excuse me?
ANE and EHG both predate Turks by well over 8,000 years.
>R is found in Native Americans
questionable, but if true it still originated in European EHG and ultimately in Europoid ANE/Sunghir-Cromags
>original R carriers were Turks
Turks are east Asian or hapas. They are neither Cro-Magnid (Sunghir) nor Australoid (Basal P, Tianyuan)
Turks are not a single race, this supports the idea of them being the mutts of European males and Siberian females.
>All R came from central Asia
Which one? Oldest R1b is found in Europe
Oldest R1a is found in Europe.
Basal R* is found in Northern Siberia not central Asia.
It was exclusively found in ANE and EHG, both groups which had exactly zero Asiatic features.
No Im talking about central Asia where haplotype diversity is huge and autosomal diversity can vary between clustering with Chukchis or Georgians.
yes it is because youre trying to push: out of central asia in 24k bc where the turks lived in the 400bc means they were turks
There is no Turkish genetic cluster.
All Turkish genetic clusters are farther from ANE and original R* carriers than European clusters, specifically Northern Europeans who are themselves only 60-70% R
