>>213858609
There are a shit-ton of factors involved and there's no magic solution which will make any system flawlessly work well for everyone but I believe in a more regulated market than a less-regulated market. Anything can be corrupted. I don't think a fully-planned economy will work for now. Technology isn't advanced enough for that and that's part of why central planning failed in the USSR and Maoist China.
An economy that's highly-planned but still has markets play a large role would be more effective. With more of an emphasis on planning throughout different levels of the economy rather than a too top-heavy approach.
There are a few characteristics about how the Chinese government and economy is run that prevent some of the problems you typically see under more free-market capitalism which I think can be useful but other aspects I don't like (the censorship and trying to micro-manage peoples' lives for example).