← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 213880376

12 posts 6 images /int/
Anonymous United States No.213880376 >>213880414 >>213880607 >>213880675 >>213880723 >>213880890 >>213881692 >>213881855
Give me one single good reason this shouldn’t be done
Anonymous Israel No.213880414
>>213880376 (OP)
could you not have used your time better than to make this thread?(you)
Anonymous Sweden No.213880607
>>213880376 (OP)
Something about swamp diseases and dormant, poisonous water. I can't cite the explanation but it apparently wouldn't do much good besides killing a couple of million africans for the first few decades. But maybe that's what you wanted
Anonymous United Kingdom No.213880675 >>213880777 >>213880948 >>213881073
>>213880376 (OP)
Why? How would it benefit anybody?
This is like the retarded plan from the 19th century about draining the Mediterranean Sea to add more land. Absolutely retarded
Anonymous United States No.213880723
>>213880376 (OP)
You left too much land. Kill them all.
Anonymous Sweden No.213880777 >>213881766
>>213880675
To irregate the sahara obviously
Anonymous France No.213880890
>>213880376 (OP)
There's still too much of Algeria.
Anonymous Japan No.213880948
>>213880675
I think it was a plan before world wars.
The population of Europe was still increasing and farmland scarcity was fatally concerned at the time, while the local subsaharan population was quite a few.
Anonymous Chile No.213881073
>>213880675
it would have a funny name
Anonymous Brazil No.213881692
>>213880376 (OP)
How would this be achieved? Even the Panama Canal was a huge achievement that took over 3 decades to complete
Anonymous United Kingdom No.213881766
>>213880777
Ah yes irrigate the Sahara in exchange of destroying the Amazon and reducing farming yields in Europe
Anonymous Argentina No.213881855
>>213880376 (OP)
how do you make a lake?