is the HIV risk thing actually well substantiated? I feel like having your gland exposed 24/7 should be far riskier in terms of getting HIV but maybe moist damp foreskin lets it breed better idk.
>>213958148 >The evidence regarding whether circumcision helps prevent HIV is not as clear among men who have sex with men (MSM). >The effectiveness of using circumcision to prevent HIV in the developed world is not determined. >The WHO does not recommend circumcision as protection against male to male HIV transmission, as evidence is lacking in regards to receptive anal intercourse
I love it when doctors use unclear data to advise people to mutilate their penises. That's gotta be their favorite pass time aside from overbilling insurance
>>213957449 (OP)
These are massive over-estimations. The guy who conducted this study (Brian Morris) is a lolcow who has a who has a circumcision fetish.
>>213957449 (OP)
this isn't the current infant circumcision rate, it's the percent of all men who are cut.
The UK used to cut a lot before the NHS was founded, and they do have a lot of Muslims