>>213960651
Taiwan can just continue importing mainland Chinese though. The only people China could realistically import are Africans but those are economic net negatives.
>>213960569 (OP)
White and Asian girls are usually considered the prettiest but they are dying out
Tyrone and Raj would pump those numbers up if they can get in
>>213961847
2.1 is enough for replacement. Even in europe mulims have 2.2
This is the case for most muslims, like I said Iran is the problem.
Your people will be replaced and you will still wonder why LOL
Are nords humiliated wagies in general too? Like, almost no expendable income after basic expenses?
A lot of people I know said they'd have kids if they could afford it.
>>213961090
ive been telling people the gods need blood to keep the world alive, ww2 kept them sated for a while with the intermittent snacking but unfortunately they dont want to die so theyre gonna do another big war soon
>>213963077 >Why?
To maintain standard of living, but alternatively you could just immigration as a form of efficient reallocation of population. If you're racist though, you're shit out of luck and need to find some way to increase birth rates. >Isn't the earth already overpopulated?
Not really, it's more inefficient than anything.
>>213960569 (OP)
the demographic issue is you need young people to sustain old people.
the first solution is increasing number of young people.
the second solution is decreasing the number of old people.
vaccines and diets are already taking the course of the second solution. don't worry.
>>213963137 >To maintain standard of living
But standard of living hasn't been going up exponentially alongside population. If anything it's been stagnating or even getting worse since the 1970s. Also automation technology is constantly getting better, which reduces the amount of labor needed to produce the same goods. I don't see how having 1950s level of population in 2100 would be bad at all.
>>213963180
It's about what proportion of the population is working age. Without immigration or a drastic increase in birth rate (though of course here there is also a lag), there simply aren't enough people to maintain functioning of services and other basic things like logistics etc.
Of course, like >>213963161 you COULD also start killing off old people, but of course, most people aren't psychopaths so it would probably not be a very popular solution.
>>213963236 >most people aren't psychopaths
politicians are
they're already trying to lower life expectancy
you'll work all your life and then die without ever seeing a dime of your retirement