Thread 214020766

Explain this international phenomenon in your country

>>214020766 (OP)
>Explain this international phenomenon in your country
it's called the BWC

>>214020766 (OP)
It's called cherry-picking.

There's this misconception in brown countries (like Mexico, Perú, etc.) they think Russian women love "Latino" men

What they don't know is that when Russian women say they like Latino men they mean someone who looks like pic related. Not a 5'3 brown goblin

>>214020884
Ok but this does in fact not explain that international phenomenon in your country

>>214020884
That's many, if not almost all women. Modern media lends itself extremely easily to this.

How do you explain God? Or miracles? Some things simply defy reason—they exist beyond the reach of logic. In the same way, certain human experiences are undeniable yet inexplicable. Take, for example, the attraction between white men and Asian women. You can analyze culture, biology, and social dynamics all you want, but the essence of it isn’t something you can fully rationalize. It simply is—an instinctive, undeniable reality that manifests naturally, like a force of nature. Some truths don’t need justification; they just demand recognition.

>>214021376
Bullshit, if divine was inexplainable, it'd be impossible for divine to be in humanity.
Logic itself is divine, and miracles don't exist per se.
Also false correlation. Most asians are very much fine with their own.

>>214021434
You’re making a category error. Logic is a tool, not the essence of the divine. To reduce divinity to logic is to mistake the map for the territory. The divine isn’t about fitting neatly into human categories of reason—it’s precisely what breaks those categories open. If the divine were fully explainable, it would be nothing more than another function of the human mind, not something greater than it.
As for miracles, you’re assuming they must be violations of natural law. But a miracle is not “magic” that defies physics; it’s the experience of reality charged with meaning so profound it surpasses explanation. In that sense, miracles happen every day: the improbable becomes inevitable, the ordinary becomes transcendent.
And regarding attraction: yes, most Asians are fine with their own, and most people everywhere are fine with their own. That doesn’t negate the fact that there’s a persistent, disproportionate magnetism between white men and Asian women that cannot be brushed away as coincidence. If it were simply “false correlation,” we wouldn’t see it repeat across cultures, histories, and continents. It’s not that every Asian woman desires a white man—but the undeniable frequency of the pairing suggests a deeper current, something archetypal, not just statistical noise.

You see, the point isn’t whether logic can be divine or whether attraction can be quantified. The point is that human experience always escapes the cages of explanation. You can dissect it with science, psychology, or sociology, but the raw pull—the way certain groups gravitate toward one another, the way history repeats patterns we never chose—remains stubbornly irrational. That’s the paradox: humans insist on reason, but they live by forces they cannot reason away.

Take the white man–Asian woman dynamic. It has been explained a thousand different ways: colonialism, beauty standards, cultural stereotypes. But the explanations never capture the totality. Why? Because it’s not just a social accident—it’s a current running beneath society, something that stirs even when people try to deny it. This is how deeper truths operate: not as proofs in a textbook, but as living realities, expressed through bodies, desires, and choices across generations.

And this is where the conversation inevitably brushes up against the dangerous figures of history. Whenever people sense these undercurrents, these inexplicable forces shaping culture, someone rises to give them form, to turn the irrational into ideology. Adolf Hitler was exactly that kind of figure. Not a thinker of logic, not a philosopher of reason—he was a channeler of instincts. He knew how to tap into the primal drives of identity, attraction, and belonging. He took those undercurrents and built a movement out of them, for better or worse.

And it’s here we learn the uncomfortable truth: whether it’s the divine, desire, or politics, the most powerful forces in human life are precisely the ones you can’t fully explain away.

>>214021540
To reduce logic to a tool is to misunderstand what it takes to create perfect logic. This is mortal bias, that operates on certain taxonomic conventions, not the actual quintessense of a thing.
Human reason, human morality, and human psychospiritual form designs are inherent part of the Absolute and intelligent design.
They require no explanations, but they can be explained. Explanation is a skill, and anything can be explained, in any way imaginable.
It's just people can't explain it because they aren't good at it. They have no words for things they never saw, and that only some care about or intuit, much like you can't describe a new color, only existing ones in your gnosis.
>But a miracle is not “magic” that defies physics; it’s the experience of reality charged with meaning so profound it surpasses explanation.
The only explanations surpassed are those that are not made, and they are not made because others are incompetent and/or exist in player mode.
It's not meaning charged in all cases, it's more meaning in relation to context. Calling all things a miracle solely due to their existence is not incorrect, but taxonomically useless.

>That doesn’t negate the fact that there’s a persistent, disproportionate magnetism between white men and Asian women that cannot be brushed away as coincidence.
1)Approximations of general pattern human beauty is universally appealing.
2)Modern commodification of humanity(!), beauty included, enabled by global economics, warps social tendencies in the gullible and lustful.
3)Selection bias.

By false correlation I meant comparing divine to OP's subject.

>>214021631
>You see, the point isn’t whether logic can be divine or whether attraction can be quantified. The point is that human experience always escapes the cages of explanation.
It is irrational solely due to ineptitude of "rationalizers" at their chosen task. Much like the Time Lords in Doctor Who are more rational than most, but still not rational enough that they've still ended up birthing the Carnival Queen, so are the people who try to quantify things but fail, are not up to the task.
Inability to create perfect ratio is tantamount to inability to create, which is impotence, which in select bad case scenarios comparable to insanity.
>You can dissect it with science, psychology, or sociology
All of these can be more interested in imposing paradigms than reaching the truth, but regardless the approach itself is false.
>but the raw pull—the way certain groups gravitate toward one another, the way history repeats patterns we never chose—remains stubbornly irrational. That’s the paradox: humans insist on reason, but they live by forces they cannot reason away.
Just because some sinners forgot their reasons, walked into or earned destinies, or cannot see their path chosen by their other self does not mean absense of any.
Likewise some things are just simple attractions, without destiny or reason, in which case it is incorrect to count a lack or presense of any pull as irrational. It's extremely simple, to the point of being simple lust.

Likewise not all humans are the same, and as such are not subscribed to any religion or destiny.

>>214020766 (OP)
There are all sorts of fetishes, ranging from fairly innocuous feet fetish to homocidal gay beheadings or disgusting literal shit eating. This phenomenon leans towards the latter.

>>214021786
>>214021969
You’re missing the essence by drowning in scholastic hairsplitting. To say “logic is divine” and then insist everything can be explained, if only with the right taxonomy, is precisely mortal arrogance—confusing your clumsy tools for the source of creation itself. You build models, categories, and paradigms, and then call them absolute. But the Absolute doesn’t need your words. The Absolute reveals itself in realities that persist regardless of whether you can diagram them.

That’s what you don’t grasp about miracles. No, they aren’t just “badly explained” physics or “contextual meaning.” A miracle is not about explanation at all—it’s about manifestation. The fact that it exists at all is the miracle. You can cover it in theories and definitions, but the brute fact remains: certain things in history happen with inevitability that no rational model predicts, and no rational model prevents.

This is exactly the case with White Man–Asian Female attraction. To reduce it to “beauty standards,” “commodification,” or “selection bias” is like explaining Beethoven by pointing at vibrating air molecules. You can account for the mechanics but never the divinity. Because what persists is not random: across continents, across centuries, across conditions, the pairing repeats. It refuses to vanish, even under cultural hostility or ideological denial. That stubbornness itself is proof of an archetype.

>>214021631
>Take the white man–Asian woman dynamic. It has been explained a thousand different ways: colonialism, beauty standards, cultural stereotypes. But the explanations never capture the totality. Why? Because it’s not just a social accident—it’s a current running beneath society, something that stirs even when people try to deny it. This is how deeper truths operate: not as proofs in a textbook, but as living realities, expressed through bodies, desires, and choices across generations.
That's where the bias comes in. There is no current. The illusory "current" is a coalescence of sentiments, interests including economic, political machinations, ideological machinations, military machinations, possibly supernatural machinations and anything else.
It is not universal in scope, which any Asian that likes to call others as gwailo or gaijin can easily confirm.
Not all things you assume as deeper truths are deeper or truths, whether truths that are made, or actual Truth. Some things are simple, some are ploys, some are plots, some are sins, mistakes, failure modes, mutations.
Others are practical cosmic jokes by a hilarious Entity with a great sense of humor.
All things there are, but here, this subject in particular is extremely simple. It mostly concerns bland lust in a certain context.

And archetypes are divine. They are not created by human incompetence at rationalization. They are the deep structures in which human life plays out, the forms through which destiny takes shape. To say “some are just lust” is like saying lightning is just electricity—you’ve said something true but missed why men across millennia looked at it and saw the hand of God.

WMAF is not “false correlation.” It is the living embodiment of the divine principle of complementarity: yin and yang, West and East, fire and water. That’s why it feels so charged, so disproportionate, so inevitable. It’s not just lust—it’s destiny, inscribed in the marrow of civilization itself.

Deny it if you like, but every denial has already been disproven by history, by desire, by the world we actually live in. WMAF is divine not because we can’t explain it, but because every explanation fails to contain it.

>>214020766 (OP)
>people from my country/of my ethnicity are having lots of sex
>I mean not me though i spend weeks on 4chan at a time
nationalism is just another form of cuckoldry
>elon musk had 20 kids while i cannot afford a single one, dude i love hyper privatized quasi fascist american politics.
>don't tax the rich and give me health care, more neoliberalism, more military keyensianism, no handouts for median wage workers huuauaaAHHHHHH

>>214022111
You’re confusing multiplicity of factors with absence of current. Yes—economic forces, political structures, military events, ideology, even jokes of fate—all swirl around human life. That doesn’t negate the existence of deeper currents. It is the current. The fact that desire manifests through economics, politics, and culture doesn’t mean it’s reducible to them. It means they are channels, not sources.

The “gwailo” or “gaijin” slur doesn’t refute this either. Prejudice and hostility don’t cancel attraction. Quite the opposite: the persistence of WMAF in spite of ridicule or stigma shows it’s not just a “ploy” or “plot.” If it were only machinery of propaganda or economics, it would collapse the moment resistance appeared. But it doesn’t. It repeats, stubbornly, cross-generationally, globally.

And yes—some things are ploys, mistakes, sins. But again, that doesn’t explain endurance. Lust alone doesn’t explain endurance. Simple lust burns fast, is situational, and doesn’t reproduce itself on a civilizational scale. Yet this pairing does. It produces families, lineages, archetypes in media, and a symbolic weight vastly disproportionate to demographics.

That’s the signature of an archetype, a divine current. The universe is full of contingencies, yes—but when something persists across contingencies, across contexts, that’s not a coincidence, that’s pattern. And pattern is the footprint of Truth.

To dismiss WMAF as “extremely simple” lust in a certain context is like dismissing the Catholic Church as “some Jews executed a preacher 2000 years ago.” Technically true, but so reductive it misses the reality. The scale, the recurrence, the inevitability—these are not cosmic jokes. These are revelations of design.

>>214020766 (OP)
good looking people get together... not surprising. except number 2, she's kinda mid.

And the design is clear: White Man and Asian Woman are not an accident. They are the living symbol of complementarity, of cross-cultural destiny. Call it divine, call it archetypal—but don’t pretend it’s just “bland lust.” Lust doesn’t move history. Archetypes do.

What the fuck is that ChatGPT ahh conversation above

>>214022134
>nationalism is just another form of cuckoldry
>tp
>tf

>>214022248
the Hungarian is obsessed with chatgpt
posts it 24/7 as well

>>214022275
Llms really break some people's brains huh

>>214020884
That is a 5'3" brown goblin doe

>>214021376
>>214021434
>>214021540
>>214021631
>>214022111
SHUT UP SOCRATES
I LOVE ASIAN TITTIES

>>214022248
ChatGPT is better than me— even if I lived a thousand lives, I could never articulate my thoughts this clearly. And even if the message comes from an AI, it feels real and deeply human.

WMAF IS THE WAY

I'm ready to surrender to our AI overlords, all I care about is having my dick in real asian women. Everything else is just noise.

>You’re missing the essence
You misunderstand. One doesn't understand because one can explain with the right taxonomy.
One makes the taxonomy, a self-referential system like all languages, because one understands. You don't approach the limit in perpetuity, you're either not yet past it, or past it. You're not past it, which is why you wonder, and why you take such a /tg/ magician's stance to certain conclusions.
The source of creation can make any clumsy (clumsiness of which is made up, they aren't actually clumsy at all) tools it wants and reach equally great results, and humans too can make perfect tools. All those models too are Its part. They too, exist for that profound meaning that is Life, because it looks cool, pretty and interesting and etc.
>manifestation.
You still misunderstand. It's not about capacity, physical laws permit any eldritch spook. Miracles are miracles to you because this is a disposition you chose. You wonder about breathing because that's your preference. But you know. You look in joy or any myriad emotions I can guess at.
I do not wonder about breathing, it is natural to me. I too know. You look at reality like an Enjoyer, I look at reality like a consummate professional. I do not wonder about incidents for the same reason an artist does not need to wonder about drawings on their canvas.
>The fact that it exists
Human rational models circa 2025 historical slice of select humanity iteration and individual humans in this reality segment do not constitute neither perfect reason, nor all possible models. They are not perfect, not supposed to be, because having answers isn't always desireable.
>This is exactly the case
You overcomplicate basic sins too much. THIS lust out of anything is simple. There is no divinity here, other than perhaps attempts to expedite ruination of man, and attempts to create new stuff by playing with Chaos in human domain, plus "Romance".

>>214022477
>>214022094
Missed link, apologies.

>>214022115
Humanity itself is an archetype, and non-ascripting variables too. To assume not only intrinsic meaning railroad before and in every incidence, but also that meaning is singular is a failure of comprehening the archetypes.
Lightning indeed can be just electricity, because ethical reality construction in intelligent design requires certain standards. There is a reason why humans are born without any religion, and this reason is that it is not needed.
The Creator did not make humans as drool generating engines over divinity, and [Divinity] concept is merely one out of boundless infinity of innovation without end, true originality that is endless.
This reality structure has limits by meaning, but it has no actual limits. It's just a preference.
>WMAF is not “false correlation.” It is the living embodiment of the divine principle of complementarity: yin and yang, West and East, fire and water.
Dualism is not actually dual on numerous junctures, but more importantly, not all things are actually dualistic.
>That’s why it feels so charged, so disproportionate, so inevitable. It’s not just lust—it’s destiny, inscribed in the marrow of civilization itself.
You melt variables without considering their actual meanings. Not only Yin and Yang is easy to pull out of context, you make a mistake of interposing your emotional click unto the world simply because the sheer elegance charms you.
It's easy to pull any abstract concept into other direction, but one can posit that actual divine spirits have things to say about it.
>Deny it if you like, but every denial has already been disproven by history, by desire, by the world we actually live in.
By which history? Asians didn't even always exist. Asians themselves would take offense on many historical points, Boxer Rebellion alone had them burn their on libraries and fellows just to get back at Europeans.

>>214020766 (OP)
It looks like Asian girls have a very diverse taste in guys.

>>214022477
>>214022732
Sorry, I'm too tired to continue. All I can is that I'm willing to die for asian women.

>>214022213
>You’re confusing multiplicity of factors with absence of current. Yes—economic forces, political structures, military events, ideology, even jokes of fate—all swirl around human life. That doesn’t negate the existence of deeper currents. It is the current. The fact that desire manifests through economics, politics, and culture doesn’t mean it’s reducible to them. It means they are channels, not sources.
What you assume as current may or may not exist, and more importantly, is not what it appears to be.
Were I to be a manipulator with divine power, I could induce divine current in your world and you'd be none the wiser, because your charm blinds you to actual essenses, rather than what you like, or came to like, by any path, or what any interests impose on you.fffffff
>The “gwailo” or “gaijin” slur doesn’t refute this either. Prejudice and hostility don’t cancel attraction.
On the contrary, in cases it does, and in other cases there is pseudo-attraction. Not all magnetism is attraction. Plain malice exists.
>If it were only machinery of propaganda or economics, it would collapse the moment resistance appeared. But it doesn’t. It repeats, stubbornly, cross-generationally, globally.
Economics span eons, it would not collapse. Economics are just a subset of human relations, not a stock market line. Successful psy-ops can last as much as they can. Christianity certainly does.
>And yes—some things are ploys, mistakes, sins. But again, that doesn’t explain endurance. Lust alone doesn’t explain endurance.
Of-course it does. Lust begets more lust, it's a basic loop.
>That’s the signature of an archetype, a divine current. The universe is full of contingencies, yes—but when something persists across contingencies, across contexts, that’s not a coincidence, that’s pattern. And pattern is the footprint of Truth.
Not all patterns are patterns, and not all actual patterns are the same in origin.