← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 214021206

18 posts 6 images /int/
Anonymous United States No.214021206 >>214022740 >>214023184 >>214024116 >>214024169 >>214024197 >>214025823
:(
Anonymous United States No.214022740
>>214021206 (OP)
https://www.specialolympics.org/stories/athletes/youngest-member-of-bangladesh-team-takes-silver
HAHAHAHA
Anonymous United Kingdom No.214023184 >>214027532
>>214021206 (OP)
Bangladesh is the arsehole of Asia
Anonymous United States No.214024093
>175 million population
grim
Anonymous United States No.214024116
>>214021206 (OP)
Purely economic factors
Anonymous United States No.214024169
>>214021206 (OP)
Britisher colonialism bhai
Anonymous Finland No.214024197 >>214024211
>>214021206 (OP)
Tbh, if you look at the number of athletes they are sending it's not *that* surprising that they aren't winning any medals.
Just as an example, in 2024 they sent 5 athletes and Finland sent 56.
Anonymous Poland No.214024211 >>214024371
>>214024197
Chuds will tell you number of athletes has nothing to do with that and it's actually because they have brown skin
Anonymous Brazil No.214024352 >>214024430
>nordics didn't accomplish much thorough history because they live in a cold, gelid wasteland that impeded their progress until the industrial revolution
>browns have no excuse for not having these achievements lol socioeconomic and geogrpahic factors don't exist tranny
the duality of Chud
Anonymous Canada No.214024371 >>214027646
>>214024211
Why is a country of 175 million sending only 5 athletes?
>because le poverty
For fuck sake even Haiti sent more people this past olympics
Anonymous Sweden No.214024430 >>214024478
>>214024352
There weren't even enough people in the Nordics for a town until the year 700, the Roman Empire had a population of 70 million in the year 0
Anonymous Brazil No.214024478 >>214024590
>>214024430
so you are saying... socioeconomic and geographic factors impeded your people's development while favoring the roman's?
Anonymous Sweden No.214024590
>>214024478
If population density is considered development then you're not talking about Bangladesh anymore
Anonymous India No.214025823
>>214021206 (OP)
Someone post the bangladesh /sp/ post
Anonymous India No.214027532
>>214023184
I've been for a few years, and I completely fuckin agree
Anonymous New Zealand No.214027646 >>214027750
>>214024371
>Why is a country of 175 million sending only 5 athletes?
Because they obviously don't care about it. The Olympics are a western event. The only countries who aren't in that sphere and are still highly competitive have been communist countries due to the Cold War background context.
It's a little like the US being the best at gridiron football. Nobody in Europe for example gives a fuck about being the best quarterback.
Anonymous United Kingdom No.214027750 >>214027824
>>214027646
They care about cricket and they are dogshit
Anonymous New Zealand No.214027824
>>214027750
I thought that was more of an India thing but they seem quite highly ranked: https://www.espncricinfo.com/rankings/icc-team-ranking
It's also pointless to compare because all the teams have South Asians on them.