>>214243351
>So can you tell that they're from Vladivostok/Far East immediately or does the fact that they're "recent" colonists mean their accents are very similar to European Russia as >>214241950 said?
It's always more difficult with recently "colonized" areas like the Far East and new Siberian cities (like Novosibirsk, Krasnoyarsk), because the population there is often mixed and usually has a Central Russian-like pronunciation, although you still can recognize them by some specific words, that other Russians don't usually use, if you listen to them for 10+ minutes. But it's pretty easy to distinguish South Russian (quite similar to Ukrainian and Belarusian, soft Г, lots of specific words, very "musical" rhythm of speech) from Central Russian (normal Moscow pronunciation, unstressed O sounds like A, unstressed E sounds like И, Г is always hard, etc) from Northern Russian (unstressed O never merges with A, unstressed E rarely merges with I, etc). And it's strange to me when people say they can't tell Muscovites from Petersburgers unless they use local words, because for me it's quite easy to identify native Petersburgers, they sound a bit more "noble", I think they speak a bit slower than us, the Muscovites, and a bit more clearly, their speech is less smooth, each word sounds more distinct, although both Moscow and Petersburg belong to Central Russian dialects.