Thread 214567808

Why did China succeed while India failed?

>>214567808 (OP)
China liberalized their economy first and benefited from the fast reforms of a single party government. India only liberalized its economy in 1991 and democracies are structurally slower at reforms than single-party states. However they benefit from being more stable and having peaceful transfers of power

>>214567896
Chinese GDP was higher than India even under Mao. If anything India's GDP was higher than china's only when china started liberalizing their economy.

>>214567808 (OP)
Benefits of a one party state

>>214567808 (OP)
Because arguably China is a single nation, where India is closer to a loose confederacy of countries who's federal government is constantly fighting and stamping out widespread ethnic conflict that makes pre-war Europe look like Weenie Hut Jr's by comparison.

There's only so much you can do if that's the cards dealt out

>>214567808 (OP)
The Chinese have an insect like industriousness and culture that values obedience. India has nothing. No creative spirit, no industriousness, no innovative spirt. I don't think India has uniquely developed or invented anything of worth to the rest of the world.

>>214567972
India has a rural mindset

>>214567972
India is an ancient country with colorful and multitude of culture, while china is a modern economic state.

>>214568022
Colorful is a polite way of saying it I suppose.

>>214567808 (OP)
China is a homogenous country that values discipline and obedience. India is splintered across different ethnic and religious groups.

You need to go back as well. There are billions of people in China and not one posts here but all their diaspora do because China is a Venezuela tier shithole. Even despite the egregious posts from jeet diaspoo, there ARE some jeet posters who actually live in India. Chinamen all post about their non-existent superiority from superior nations.

>>214567808 (OP)
East Asians are relatively white
India is brown

It's hilarious seeing the American far right call China "third worldist" now while supporting India

>>214568239
>hilarious seeing the American far right call China "third worldist" now while supporting India
Yeah, no one's doing that

>>214568298
Twitter Trumptards like Bronze Age Pervert are doing that

>>214567808 (OP)
India is loved by everyone unlike China.

>>214568320
>a couple of retard accounts on X ≠ regular consensus

>>214567896
Wrong
Mao's retardation also destroyed all the oogabooga shit that plagued China while India suffers with it to this very day

>>214567808 (OP)
>Indians cook with Ganges water
>Chinese don’t cook with Ganges water

>>214568518
It's not the regular consensus, but it's reflective of US policy, with the messaging adapted for online rightoids. JD Vance actually follows some of these people

>>214567808 (OP)
Competent dictatorship vs demoncrazy voted for by sub-70 IQ gib guzzler

>>214567808 (OP)
This is the best modern example of an authoritarian one party state that makes quick decisive decisions beating the slow bureacratic democracy that divides the government and the people. China and india were both poor raisinholes struck by famine and absolutely humiliated by foreigners, but one country was authoritarian and they made rapid decisions on fixing their country, one country became a paralyzed democracy, incompetent idiots voted into power not being able to fix anything.

>>214567808 (OP)
Top down state management vs chaotic cronyism.

>>214568320
Reminder that many if not most of the twitter Trumptard accounts are actually Indians. It is an epidemic.

>>214567896
>india
>more stable
Wtf are you smoking? It's more dangerous and they still suffer from insurgency groups and terrorists.

>>214568210
Well it certainly doesn't help that 4chan IP bans Chinese posters. I know as I went there and couldn't post regardless of the city or province I was in.

Name 3 relatively successful brown countries out of 200 or so countries in the world