← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 214618249

7 posts 4 images /int/
Anonymous Brazil No.214618249 >>214619301 >>214623171
If humans had tails would it be considered a erotic body part?
If humans had tails would it be considered an erotic body part?
Like, there's feetfags, there would, definitely, be tailfags. for sure. But would it NOT be niched, would it be common to find it attractive, like big hands on men and slim waists on females?

What would constitute a attractive tail? Long, short, girthy, slender, hairy, shaved... There would be gender differention about which of these traits would be desirable, some would be good on females but not males and vice versa?

AND internationally speaking there would be national preferences?
Anonymous United States No.214618369
I don't think it would be concealed by clothing. It would probably occupy a similar position to hair (a major factor in attractiveness, though not erotic).
Anonymous Ireland No.214619301 >>214621994
>>214618249 (OP)
fun fact: in German, Schwanz means tail and penis, it's the same thing
Anonymous United States No.214620386
bigger = better
Anonymous United States No.214621994
>>214619301
having a normal language? sorry, we don't do that in GERMANY
Anonymous Russian Federation No.214623171 >>214623220
>>214618249 (OP)
Humans have tails, even neural connections to them and muscles to control it.
Anonymous United States No.214623220
>>214623171
if that were the case, wouldn't we have phantom limbs for tails?
>inb4 russian starts talking about how he's a tailnik or something and he has phantom limb everyday