Thread 214867497

Finding out I have a mediocre IQ of 105 was a mild blow to my self-esteem. Perhaps sardines, cardio and math can cure my retardation (probably not)

Happens iyc?

>>214867497 (OP)
You are in the top 5% of Brazilians, be proud and make lots of babies.

What you do with yourself matters far more than some intelligence rating.

>>214867497 (OP)
https://mitoredlight.com/products/mitomind-helmet?variant=48000179765416

>>214867497 (OP)
YOU KNOW MATH?

>>214867596
The brazilian 80 IQ meme is a lie. It must be like 100 like everywhere else

>>214867497 (OP)
Move to a muslim country, you'd instantly be genius tier

>>214868396
lmao, that article was for sure written by a chud

>>214867497 (OP)
Haha you hinged your self-worth off a number that ultimately amounts to nothing.

>>214867655
People watched the Saiyan to Freeza saga and didn't get Toriyama's unintentional theme about how bunk using measurement stats as power level ratings were as a measure of worth.

>>214868948
imagine if he got 105$ for every reply

>>214869047
Sūn Wùkōng won by increasing his stats.

>>214867497 (OP)
If you read and study a lickle bit you may make it up to the goyim overseer rank, like 115 or something. You could probably make decent money. It doesn't stop the pain though.
>t. 133

>>214867497 (OP)
take the test multiple times and you'll score higher each time
IQ scores are a meme
t doctor

>>214869305
I've actually read some philosophy.
And will probably never make money anyway cause my interest is the humanities. I thought stem dabbling would raise some points, since its for smart people, but that's a chicken or egg scenario...
>>214869337
This is probably true

>>214867497 (OP)
I'd write a motivating message for you, but with a 105 IQ I doubt you'd be abke to read it :(

>>214869662
Who have you read? What did you think of their ideas?
>stem
You don't really have to be clever to do most STEM subjects, but you do have to be to do them properly

>>214869802
Haven't read much... let's see, i'll try to comment on what was most remarkable:
>couple dialogues by Plato
good for mitigating the relativistic tendencies of the modern world, with his stress on the eternal, unchanging forms. Gives the reader a more objective way of thinking.
>Nietzsche
His specific book I got was like an overview of the cultural progression of western civilization from the Greeks up until his own century, among other things (the book was somewhat haphazard, unstructured). He seemed traumatized with dogmatic metaphysics too, seemed like he sees it as antithetical to what he describes as a "free spirit"

Other than that, I read Stirner, some essays by schopenhauer, the stoic Seneca, Aristotle's ethics and a bit of history of philosophy by Copleston.

guess that's it. You into philosophy too?

>>214867497 (OP)
I know the feeling since I only scored 107 on WAIS-IV last year.