Thread 215772661

uuh german bros...?

Free people of Germania is a force of nature

>Louis XVI
lmao

>>215772771
they probably confused him with Louis XIV (non-whites can't into roman numerals)

>>215772925
why isn't Karl der Große shown with a german flag? did they confuse belgium and france with germany?

>>215773062
Karol Wielki was Polish

>>215772661 (OP)
Come on, 10 is a multi-ethnic quota.
Never heard of him.

>>215773097
true, a real central european

1. The British Crown 1805-1945

>>215772661 (OP)
queen victoria mogs all of these

>>215773292
She was a figurehead for the British government and therefore not a real monarch, thoughbeit.

>>215772661 (OP)
>Akbar the great
Doesnt akbar mean great already? So hes "great the great"?
Also charlemagne belongs to both of us, this silly account doesnt change that

>>215773568
>male lineage goes back to belgium
>everything else french
>belongs to both of us
this is like when croats say tesla is croatian

>>215773682
Germany (and france and belgium) developed from his empire, he ruled from Aachen, he belonged to a tribe that would become parts of all three nations. German emperors would wear his crown for a thousand years, until ironically, a frenchman ended that whole thing. Sorry pierre, we both come from KARLs empire

>>215772661 (OP)
>3, 8, 10
LITERALLY who?

>>215774002
I know the chinese guy but 3 and 10 are celebrity hires by the guy who runs the account (a jeet)

>>215772661 (OP)
>Ashoka the Great
Can someone tell me the ethnicity of the person tweeting this?

>>215772661 (OP)
>Julius Caesar on the list
>Not Trajan who ruled Rome when she was at her zenith in size
Bruh. Bruhhhhhhhhhhhh

>>215774120
Good morning Saar Britisher history not true Saar

>>215772661 (OP)
>akbar the great in the top 10
>ashoka above every chinese and roman emperor
>alexander inexplicably in number 1
indian list
and qin shi huang is probably not the pick if you can only choose one chinese emperor. also, despite his historical influence, in terms of actual power in life charlemagne is a literal who compared to everyone else on that list except louis xvi

>>215772661 (OP)
Ridiculous.

The most powerful Kings ever were the Catholic KIngs from Spain. Discovering a whole continent, and exploring, colonizing and owning it. Defeating empires, fighting against 20 countries at the same time and also owning 30% of Europe.

>>215774512
>nooooo why is this list biased towards south asians! it should be biased towards anglos!
Calm your bussy

>>215776977
there shouldn't be a single anglo monarch on the list either. by the height of the colonial empire they were barely more than figureheads. napoleon and the kings of spain are the only euro monarchs worth consideration after classical antiquity. ashoka should also definitely be on there, nothing wrong with that, just not above e.g. constantine or the qianlong emperor.

>>215772661 (OP)
genkis khan was just a fat mongol

>>215776847
Charles the fifth should be on this list youre right

>>215772661 (OP)
Out of these only Charlemagne are great, others were occasional warlords with lucky timing

>>215774316
If only they were actually cute like this cat. Indians make me want to vomit when I see them

we probably don't know most of history.

>>215772661 (OP)
You know this list is fucking bullshit when they didn't name Charles V or Philip II of Spain

>Charlemagne with the Belgian flag
>Belgium would not exist for a thousand years
What did he mean by this

>>215772661 (OP)
You can tell this is made by someone from a colonized nation because Britain, Spain and Portugal are not on the list.

>>215781945
got the German flag the wrong way and the Dutch flag too

>caesar
king of what?

>>215772661 (OP)
>not even mentioning Mesopotamian ruler.
Awful top 10.

Augustus should be instead of Caesar