>>215858022 (OP)
Lmao, what's with Westerners and their insatiable hunger of being c#cked by a BBC, Not a single scholar in fourteen centuries, not Ibn Kathir, not Bayhaqi, not Tabari, not one of the actual giants of Islamic knowledge ever took that hadith to mean anything sexual. Every last one of them, fluent in the language and steeped in its meanings, understood it exactly as it’s meant: a spiritual encounter, not your cuckoldry fantasy. But somehow a clueless ret#ard who can’t even read Arabic thinks he’s uncovered what a thousand years of scholarship missed? You can’t tell the difference between a metaphor and a verb, yet you think you’ve outsmarted people who lived and breathed this language.
