← Home ← Back to /int/

Thread 215864393

13 posts 4 images /int/
Anonymous Canada No.215864393 [Report] >>215864481 >>215864627 >>215865347
Quebec is the best part of Canada because it was settled by French. The rest of Canada was settled by Anglos which is why it's worse. You can see that France is a relatively better place to live than Britain. The same is reflected in the new world based on who settled it. If Canada was settled by Scandinavians it would be like Scandinavia economically.
Anonymous France No.215864481 [Report] >>215864569 >>215864597 >>215864890
>>215864393 (OP)
Your hypothesis falls flat in the face of factual evidence. Explain Louisiana.
Anonymous France No.215864569 [Report]
>>215864481
Blacks
Anonymous United States No.215864597 [Report]
>>215864481
Louisiana hasn't been French for a VERY long time
Anonymous United States No.215864627 [Report] >>215864774
>>215864393 (OP)
left to their own devices Quebec would have been another Argentina, a promising settler colony that still under performs due to Latins inability to produce a strong industrial middle class society, resulting in a predispositions towards political instability and dictatorships.
Anonymous Iran No.215864774 [Report]
>>215864627
>a promising settler colony that still under performs due to Britshits* inability to produce a strong industrial middle class society, resulting in a predispositions towards political instability and dictatorships.
You could've just said Canada.
Anonymous France No.215864834 [Report] >>215864910
The rest of Canada was also settled by French, it just anglos that are standing there, awkwardly
Anonymous United States No.215864890 [Report] >>215864953
>>215864481
>Explain Louisiana.
Exiled Baptists outnumbered the Catholics, which proved fatal. Louisiana (1) still existing and (2) long history of suppressing catholics with the KKK demonstrates that France is both a latin country and a catholic nation. Louisiana would have worked if the French aristocracy was not fixated with black cock and only put French prisoners and converted natives there, as Spain did with New Mexico on the other side of Texas. Correspondingly, both NM and LA had large uncontrolled territories used for banditry and piracy, but NM got it under control much sooner because anyone who couldn't speak Spanish correctly was killed or sent to OK. LA couldn't do that, because there were no schools in LA, and nobody could speak French correctly in the first place. This is also why French died out in LA whereas it has grown (massively) in NM and surrounding states including yankee ones like Colorado.

If the French government had bothered to build a proper capital in Louisiana that doesn't flood complete with a cathedral, school and hospital a quarter of Americans would be speaking French now.
Anonymous United Kingdom No.215864910 [Report] >>215864943
>>215864834
>The rest of Canada was also settled by French
is this the same "settled" as the spanish placing an outpost once every 1400 miles they visited once every other year?
Anonymous France No.215864943 [Report]
>>215864910
Absolutely !
Anonymous Serbia No.215864953 [Report] >>215865059
>>215864890
what could have been... they fumbled BIGLY
Anonymous United States No.215865059 [Report]
>>215864953
Napoleon's mistake wasn't so much selling half of North America to us, but doing it for african islands like Haiti. Everything you posted was traded for Haiti. Which is what the French aristocrats wanted, and is the fundamental problem underscoring French colonialism and is why it failed first before Spain's. Spain's empire managed to live all the way up to 1898 just through racism, organized (by the church) breeding and catholicism alone.
Anonymous Italy No.215865347 [Report]
>>215864393 (OP)
Italy is a better place to live than england or scandinavia but you wouldn't want to live in Argentina