Thread 215881644

Is it over for them?

>>215881644 (OP)
It's better than Brazil by the way.

>>215881694
seriously? What would you do if Maduro launched a special military operation "libertação dos macacos"?

>>215881644 (OP)
yes
israel will retake the land

>>215881715
lol

Was it worth it?

It’s starting the same exact way as the Gulf War…

>>215882226
>>215882239
Do you support the use of military force against "drug traffickers"

>>215882299
Yes I do
Doubly so if the drug traffickers are actually innocent Venezuelan refugees trying to make it to US territory

>>215882299
Yes. If EU cared about its citizens it would shoot any unidentified ship trying to cross the Mediterranean.

>>215882395
But if they did that those ships and boats that they definitely want to stop and definitely arent coming because they know the EU will just save them and bring them to Europe

>>215882299
yes
i support it against boats filled with illegals and leftist rioters too

>>215881644 (OP)
hope niggduro dies tonight

>>215882299
everyone does

>>215881644 (OP)
is it true that china smugle fentanyl in venezuela boats?

I usually oppose any kind of intervention, but maduro has to go
let this be over already, venezuelans need to go back home

As long as people that look different than me die, I’ll be happy.

>>215882816
how bad is it? do u have big bunda venezuela refugees in brazil

>>215882299
>military force against CIA
idgi

>>215881644 (OP)
>Is it over for them?
>in 2002+23

>>215882859
not him but my state has the second larguest veneco population over here, i NEVER saw a good looking one. i bet they all go to Spain or USA.

>>215882859
>how bad is it?

>>215881644 (OP)
I convinced a big boobed venezuelan to show me her tits saying I'd give her money
Fuck I love manipulating poor people to goon

>>215881644 (OP)
TACO

>>215882859
more than 8 million refugees since 2013 until now, the largest humanitarian crisis in the history of the continent.

>>215883105
This. It's not the first time he does this kind of stunt

>>215881644 (OP)
Why don't the big players in the continent launch a special military operation to liberate them from socialism so Venezuelans stop flooding Brazil Argentina and Uruguay and overwhelming their institutions

>>215883150
And all because of JewSAnian sanctions

>>215883164
Brazil and Culombia supports them.
Argentina too far, army destroyed.
Chile too far, not interested.

>>215883164
also
>Uruguay
lol

If Venezuelans don't like Maduro they should overthrow him by themselves, without foreign intervention, if they can't do that then they don't deserve their freedom.

>>215883164
>Big players
No such thing. All weak, cucked nations, no military.

>>215881644 (OP)
I hope Trump liberates them from communism

>>215883218
They're lives won't be any better being ruled by Blackrock and Exonn Mobil

>>215883169
>The sanctions made me order the execution of that journalist's family o algo

>>215882299
every Hispanic is involved in drug trafficking
you don't any more evidence than that

>>215883290
I said sanctions crashed Venezuela's economy and made Venezuelans less able to resist Maduro's dictatorship

>>215883382
People are actually fine with dictatorships though, they wouldn't resist anything. They don't like not having enough money, or starving. Tangible things like that.

>>215883198
I don't want to see Uruguay infested with Venezuelans. It's just sad. Also I had an Argentinian friend with whom I went to dinner with and told me Argentina took in like a million venezuelans. Horrifying if true

>>215881644 (OP)
nothing ever happens moment

>>215883189
But Chile took in the 2nd most according to this>>215883013

>>215881644 (OP)
A decade with this shit. Nothing will happen

>>215883382
Are you referring to the sanctions targeting members of the government and the United Socialist Party of Venezuela? They weren't directed at ordinary citizens, but the regime's statist policies made citizens' economies heavily dependent on government aid. Exports and imports are severely limited by government policies. In any case, the political and diplomatic crisis predates the sanctions years ago.

Furthermore, the thousands of extrajudicial political assassinations, torture, and imprisonments every day, as well as the outlawing of political parties, are unrelated to the sanctions.

>>215883480
i was just impliying they dont have any saying on any geopolitical stuff, and also their president supports Maduro probably.

>>215883578
yes, i went to Chile a lot of times and they hate venezuelans over there, even more than any other inmigrant (haitians, colombians, etc) but their president is mostly aligned with Maduro (althought he critisiced Maduro when he comited fraud on the presidential election).
But even if they want to do something Venezuela is too far away, they dont have the military capability to reach Venezuela.

>bombing cartels

Based, should've done that long ago

>Invasion or CIA glowniggershit

Fuck that, you gotta be a total retard if you think an US invasion would fix that place.
Not only it would cause a massive refugee crisis, the one who sits there after it's gonna be just as bad or worse than Maduro.

>>215883664
>Are you referring to the sanctions targeting members of the government and the United Socialist Party of Venezuela?
No, I'm referring to economic sanctions. America ounishes other countries which buy Venezuelan oil.

>>215883773
Literally any country can trade with Venezuela. Do you think the US blocks the Venezuelan coast so no oil tankers can reach the UK or vice versa or something? That's not how sanctions work.

>>215883051
Based post the pics

>>215882239
is 2025 usa capable of pulling something like this?

>>215883911
now you're being disingenious. America will economically sanction companies or countries buying Venezuelan oil(except America)

>>215884007
Yes, and many other European and even Latin American countries have done so. The only bad thing is that they only do it to a few regimes. Any regime that comes to power through force should be subject to sanctions by democratic nations, including "allied" regimes like Qatar or Saudi Arabia.

This is part of my personal foreign policy:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Betancourt_Doctrine

>>215883981
Haven't you heard? We kicked out all the fatties and created an army of warriors again.

>>215883981
just because you can doesn't mean you should

>>215884155
>Any regime that comes to power through force
Are you including Republican France? Would you want to sanction France until they restore the Bourbons? Or how about sanctioning America until they become subjects of the British crown again?

>>215881644 (OP)
any time now

>>215884511
>Republican France
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_French_presidential_election

>America
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2024_United_States_presidential_election

>>215885225
The French Revolution toppled the Bourbon monarchy by force. The American revolution was a violent rebellion against the British empire.Should those countries be sanctioned until they reinsituted the regimes they toppled?

I feel bad for venecos but this will end worse for US in the states

dead million american soldiers will be worth it

>>215882299
I support the use of military force against everybody in venezuela

>>215885285
No, because the French and British monarchies of the 18th century were not political regimes that had come to power thanks to the popular will, unlike the current governments of France and the USA.

>>215882299
Absolutely. There are three kinds of people that should not be considered legally human and deserve no rights
>pirates, in the traditional naval sense
>drug smugglers, of the life ruining sort of drugs
>suicide bombers and their enablers
Any other group at least cares about collateral damage to some degree and would consider other people in harm's way to be theocratically undesirable, but the above three do not care and should be publicly executed.

>>215881644 (OP)
two more weeks

>>215885743
One man's drug smuggler is another man's hero chud
Where tf am I supposed to get my fent?

>>215885686
>the French and British monarchies of the 18th century were not political regimes that had come to power thanks to the popular will
Neither did the American government, nor the French government of 1789 for that matter. The American founding fathers were slave-owning oligarchs, and the "democracy" they founded allowed only allowed 12% of the Adult White male population, even less of the total population, to vote.

The revolutionary government set up in France committed atrocities against men, women, and children in Vendee, and Robspierre was a brutal dictator.

>>215885871
>but whatabout shit happen a century ago
Nigga are you 13 yo?

>>215885944
America isn't a democracy today either, its politicians are bribed by AIPAC and megacorporations, its electoral system is first-past-the-post so if you didn't vote for a republican or a democrat, you're not represented in the legislature, and both republicans and democrats manipulate electoral boundaries to increase their chances of getting elected.