Thread 216314454

>>216314454 (OP)
who is he again? i don't follow politics

singlehandedly awakens my erection

>>216314552
why are you so horny?

>>216314454 (OP)
>thread posted again

>>216314494
some gay vlogger

he makes kikes so fucking mad kek

>>216314738
oh okay. thanks

>>216314454 (OP)
>mom i posted it again

>>216314454 (OP)
Total Latinx Victory.

I'm so happy I escaped my /pol/ phase before this queer came around

>>216314454 (OP)
>does nothing
>nothing happens
a tale as old as time

>>216314779
The right has been poisoned by third worldism for a while now.

>>216315031
He’s only 27 which means during 2017-2020 he was in he’s late teens to early twenties

>>216314779
Too few voices from the wasp side talking about it. The takeover attempt on culture and politics is too apparent to ignore, You can already smell the rot, the atmosphere of grievance and anger that usually come as they grow.

>>216314454 (OP)
There is literally a video of Destiny sucking him off

>>216317323
Is it confirmed to be him?

>>216314454 (OP)
>american youth
>american

>>216314454 (OP)
>American youth
You mean angsty incel dudes?
Also take your idpol e-celeb trash to /pol/.

>>216315106
yeah 4chan got fucked when people form /r/donald on reddit migrated here

>>216314779
>>216317217
agree

>>216314494
zoomer online right-wing idol #43

>>216317323
No. That's AI.

What's wild is he's increasingly becoming the moderate voice on the political right. That's how far things have shifted.

>>216317636
>>American youth
>You mean angsty incel dudes?
That's the american youth. None of them like demonrats because they're gay fags that worship women.

>>216317426
No. I hate Fuentes and honestly it's sad that people fall for fake information like this so easily. Then you get people trying to bash Fuentes with fake rumors instead of real things like his connection to pedophile Ali Akbar who tried to groom and fuck young groyper followers and Fuentes had prior knowledge of it and didn't care. Afterwards, after Akbar was outed, Fuentes victim blamed by calling Akbar's victims gay. Point being Fuentes ends up looking good because people level glaringly fake shit against him that can be easily dismantled instead of the real things. Tucker didn't even ask him about Akbar.

>>216318056
Go outside and talk to people your own age anon. Or just leave the bubble.

>>216318084
Nobody likes trannycrats. Young men are right wing even the brown ones. Gen X faggots like you will soon be killed.

>>216314454 (OP)
My favorite Mexicano-Irish-Italian gay mutt.
>>216318081
It’s like the Catholic Church (and orthodox that I think about it), if the priest touches you it’s ok, if you tell people you’re gay.

>>216314454 (OP)
Why did he fall off again?.

>>216318025
Fuentes voices a different script to his followers in his own show and a different script in normalfag/conservative podcasts. He changes gears when he's out in the open to appear more Conservative and unifying. He's a chameleon and a fake. The only thing he cares about is to spite the cool kids club because he was never a part of it.

>>216318108
Whatever helps you simplify reality for that tiny noggin you got.

>>216314779
i love these lol

>>216317323
>>216317426
>>216317947
the dude getting dome is literally a fat black guy.

>>216318540
This shit is funny man. Like I wanna suck your aryan dick, like how Nickando Fuentando did to destiny’s.

>>216314494
he's not even political. he just pretends to care about politics. mostly, he just wants to be famous. his best bet would be gay interracial porn.
https://rumble.com/v13y20o-im-wearing-pants.html?e9s=src_v1_cbl%2Csrc_v1_ucp_v

>>216318357
I don't follow Nick Fuentes that much but that's not the case on the recent podcasts I've seen that invited him. When Fuentes went to PBD he basically told Patrick (middle eastern guy) at one point during the show that America could be better off if all of his people left the country.

>>216318344
He recently exploded in popularity following Kirk's assassination.

>>216318084
>bubble
That was a perfect summary of democrats actually as someone who's had the misfortune of being around them for over two decades.

>>216318924
Why?

I respect this little demon much more than majority of the radical left and the just asking questions pathetic vermin grifters like fucker and coondace

>>216319293
He cooked here

>>216319390
cooked some burritos maybe

He's a thought-provoking guy, but he cheapens his political analysis with polemics against Judaism that fall flat to anyone possessing a modicum of understanding towards the religion. It's the same with Steven Yaxley-Lennon's polemics against Islam, they only appeal to the most retarded people imaginable. At least Candace has some sense to tie the crazy Jews to a Sabbatean strain, which has an inkling of truth.

>>216314454 (OP)
This is the Fuentes guy right? Does he realise he's latinx?

>>216319634
It's not a religion thing, it's an ethnic thing. Jewish people are an ethnic group who are closely work together. Its why so many billionaires and CEOs are Jewish, they're all connected to each other and they're deeply embedded into the US government which Nick is calling it out. He said many times that he doesn't hate Jews, he's just critical of them and their motives. It's very obvious that the people who don't like Nick don't actually watch his show or understand his position clearly and get their information of him from short out of context clips. His clippers are both a blessing and a curse.

>>216319763
He is very clearly critical of Judaism. It's part of his beliefs about Jewish group identity, and why it's particular to world Jewry specifically. Otherwise he would be a neo-nazi racialist, contradicting his Catholic worldview. Ethnos just isn't relevant in a Catholic worldview; as "There is neither Jew nor Gentile".
He also cheapens his stance by rehabilitating dictators based on shallow aesthetics.

>>216319763
>>216320004
And when he is critical of Judaism, it would do him well to not misrepresent it. Otherwise the whole scaffolding falls apart. And if your thought-leader is readily willing to deceive you, what else will he convince you of?

>>216320004
Me when I post sophistry in extended paragraphs to pretend my argument has more substance than it does

>>216320058
What part of it is sophistry? His theological analyses and critique is central to his worldview. You must have strong foundations in this analyses or else you have nothing to stand on. If all his platform were "Jews have undue influence in the American government and industry out of historical circumstance", then groypers wouldn't be groypers. Else there would be no excuse to rob Jews of their individual responsibility and ability to make free choice. And if he can't do this, then he can't lump in the Barbara Lerner Spectre's of the world with the Yoram Hazony's.

>>216320142
Because the analysis of judaism he makes is one sociological, the theological aspect to jews killing jesus and their special status within christianity is a talking point used to agitate and a broader reach in his argumentation by complimenting it with the desire for a christian theocracy.

Fundamentally, what unites jews is that they are jewish.
Judaism is not a religion, judaism is descent from Isaac, jacob, judah, a particular people of particular lineage united by descent, Is a tribal identity like kurd or assyrian or armenian.
Secular jews and religious jews, even at expense of their political allegiance share a set of interests because they externally, and internally, are bestowed this particular identity which in turn is a type of identity that leads to transgression, conspiration, rewards and facilitates nepotism and collaboration and extended centuries transnationally and without a state or land limiting it.

The Yoram hazony's of the world are at the end of the day alligned with the Bari weiss'
Progressive jews are regardless of their internal relation with judaism collaborators and advocates for conservative and Religious jews within the context of alien societies where they advocate cosmopolitanism which benefits their intrusive relatives

>>216319634
whats funny is that ultimately it doesn't matter, the massive divide is already there and in order to change either side's view you would have to fundamentally change their value system.

I believe it's irreconcilable at this point and the biggest problem is they've exported it with their massive media machine. It'll just eventually end in some form of violence

>>216319755
Yeah, latinx

>>216320244
So his stance is more akin to Kevin Macdonald's rather than Martin Luther's? I agree with you that there are particular implications to Jewish endogamy than there are to universalist Christian faiths, but I don't really see the inter-ethnic collaboration as amounting much more to the basic welfare of their compatriots. You could posit that multi-culturalism, or cosmopolitanism, which endangers the European character of America, is motivated by Jewish welfare and survival, but that worldview is only held by Jewish people of a particular political affiliation, just like the contrary is held by Jewish people of a particular political affiliation, still motivated by the wellbeing of their co-religionists.

NOW, I do believe that Jewish elites of the former's political affiliation have held the reins on American policy-making for longer than what was healthier for for the country, but I don't believe this conclusion is endemic of a much more mechanical understanding of Jewish group identity. For example, in interwar Italy, Jewish membership of Mussolini's Partito Nazionale Fascista, a party explicitly against liberal democratic values, was over-represented by 200-300% in 1938! Now, the participation of Jews in anti-fascist parties was around the same, or a little bit higher. So what does this tell us? Do they play both sides? Is there a mechanical & sociological framework for explaining this? Or are Jews a particularly politically engaged minority, points above the mean in verbal IQ, and concentrated in the urban hubs, making it likely for it to be "EVERY SINGLE TIME" when looking at Jewish over-representation? We obviously don't see this same statistic in the explicitly anti-Jewish programs in Germany or Russia, which should be obvious why.

>>216320671
I believe it can be explained by Peter Turchin's 'elite over-production' theory, and a particular historical circumstance that made American institutions vulnerable to Jewish upwards mobility, and why those future Jewish elites ascending through the hierarchy were more likely to be cosmopolitan liberals than not.

American WASP institutions in education, parliament, and finance were particularly gated before WW2, seeking to preserve the WASP group identity, and this obviously was not to the liking of the Jews immigrating to the states with promises of economic freedom and prosperity. To resolve this contradiction, these Jews trying to climb the ladder found home in liberal/progressive values, hoping to create a society more equitable and accessible so that they would not be disadvantaged. Due to Jewish sensibilities, and their cultural advantage in the world of the 20th century, this was a recipe of too much Jewish success.

So, is this conceit something sui generis of the Jewish impulse, the 'people that shall dwell alone'? Or is there a more generic understanding of the changing values in America today, something multi-faceted and historical? It's a complex web of issues that I can't claim to have pieced all of it together, but I think that's equally true of those who seek to find the myopic explanation of the mechanical Jewish nature, which does more harm than it could hope to alleviate. Abandoning the unique American principle of individual liberty and their capability of free choice, and its European Christian foundation. That should be held onto, not traded for something found in the dregs of European history under Hitler or Stalin.

>>216320292
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/urN56M9hn0I

>>216320824
I would also suggest Yuri Slezkine's 'The Jewish Century' for this perspective.

>>216320671
Because their interethnic collaboration is transgressive and competitive, this is not unique to jews, but is more marked in them due to selective pressures and likely a character defined by their roots in their scriptures

The jews as they refer themselves are "a nation of priests". Which in other words ammounts to: the jews are a people that has no warrior class, no proletariat but does have an intelligentsia.
The particular character of the jews has allowed them to survive and remain a group of integrity and distinct character across multiple pogroms, social and economic systems, nations, kingdoms, republics. Etc.
After the french revolution the jews were emancipated and there was a broad secularization of the institutions
In this context of bourgeois institutions superceding clerical authority the jews, which unlike the ethnicities confronted to them had a international (favored by capitalist trade networks) and religious character allowed themselves to rise to institutional, academic and media power.

There is no such thing as acephalous institutions, once you reach a treshold in regards of selection for merit and efficiency within a institution what is selected later is capacity to cohesively organize and transgress norms to impose the power of the group with these characters.
There is obvious reasons as for why the gentiles wouldnt want a jewish oligarchy unsermining the religious, ethnic, and social character of their nation as this alien nation benefits from a cosmopolitan, secular and raceblind character.

The thing that characterizes jews is precisely that their identity is not tangential to the surrounding economy, system or society, a jew in capitalism, feudalism or communism stills a jew.
So they can support whatever side is convenient

Given all the discourse around him i checked out what's the deal with this guy and I can say the only thing he's good at is speaking. He knows how to put his thoughts into words and make them sound appealing to lifeless losers looking to justify their thoughts. I can bet he doesn't believe more than half of what he says because in the end for him its basically all for the lulz in a way

just my opinion, might be dead wrong but i really dont get his appeal, but then again i can also see why he is appealing given how horrendous political commentary has gotten in the last decade

>>216320824
A system is what it does.
I do not necessarily (altough to some extent i pressume they do) believe jews sit down in tunnels and plan or conspire against the goyim, but i do believe there is an implicit parochial empathy an selective confidence and conspirative character in that they have learned and have likely developed a culture and set of social norms in which they will trust the tribe and root out snitches and fifth collumns naturally.
It is a survivorship bias in which practices at cultural level might deliberately or not favour certain conducts that will in turn create certain outcomes for the practicing group.
And jews tend to have this behaviour, which is ultimately centralized in their rabbis and other figures of authority
It is the reactionary core of jewry. Which strains itself and its proximity with certain particular burdens that make reproductionviable only for traits that have certain favorable outcomes for the tribe.

Anyway, my point is that is intrascendent whatever jews did deliberately spread social ills among their host population or is accidental to their presence.
The issue is that allowing jews to amass institutional power creates an arms race for these positions.
And because of their special status as a caste that has a relation of internal parasitism (the secular jewry subsidizes with their work and bourgeois character the survival of the orthodox jewry, which in turn reproduces the jewry as a biological entity, there is a bourgeois-priest and a proletarian-priest in their society, but both are priestly, and as such seek and compete to occupy the positions of the intelligentsia within their host nation)

>>216314454 (OP)
When the MAGAtards are done with the indian MAGAtards, I hope they go after the latino MAGAtards and deport that mexican gay twink ass back to the home

>>216319634
what has he said about judaism that you don't like?

>>216314454 (OP)
Watch all kino casino episodes covering fuentes.

>>216319261
>majority of the radical left
You have radical leftists in Israel?

>>216314454 (OP)
His interview with Tucker Carlson isn't that interesting because they appear to share similar political views, and they tried to set up some kind of conciliatory mood during the discussion. Anon in the previous thread was right that he should talk with people like Curtis Yarvin instead.

>>216314454 (OP)
Honestly I would think he's mostly based if he weren't an influencer which is not definition a grifter and a christard