Thread 216353676

>In a January 2024 poll conducted by Savanta, support for the British monarchy stood at 48%, when respondents were asked "What would you prefer for the UK, a monarchy or an elected head of state?". This was the first time in history the figure preferring a monarchy had been below 50%, since published opinion polling on the topic had begun.[58]
Are they gonna guillotine the royal family?

Low IQ cattle don't actually know what the royal family is for. They just look at them wearing expensive clothing and think 'THEY'RE RICH THEREFORE BAD'

>>216353718
So what are they actually for

Wonder was it is amongst natives

Is it true that people are angry over one of the royals raping loli?
How old were the victims were?

>>216353676 (OP)
the british monarchy are the only ones holding epstein pedos (prince andrew) accountable

>>216353730
>what's the point of maintaining the constitutional monarchy that has existed for 400 years whilst limiting the power of (((politicians)))?

>>216353676 (OP)
Liz is gone, and they've got a Pedo amongst them. It's no surprise support drops.

>>216353759
>whilst limiting the power of (((politicians)))?

Won't they get kicked out if they tell them to stop doing bad things tho

>>216353730
Glue that holds the nation together. Human side of the tradition and history of UK. And supposedly to protect the people and be a counterweight to tyranny and extremism.
Im actually pretty monarchy pilled but the way that the demographic replacement of people has happened. No kick back or censor from the King and rhe fact the monarchy has pandered to the people who hate them most and when it comes to any kind of a head it wont be the oigjluchwu and sandeep who care about king and country

>>216353718
>>216353759
>>216353820
Are Britshites really negative intelligence subhumans with zero self-awarenes, or you guys are just this retarded?
Imagine typing these copes while Jewish bankers and merchants have been holding the entire Britain under their thumb since 1688.

>>216353759
Describe the mechanism that couldn't be applied to a republican form of government by which the monarch limits the power of elected officials. I'd be interested to hear

>>216353820
Can you help me answer this >>216353794? I genuinely recall there being a law where if the King/Queen tries to exercise her power, the monarchy gets abolished by the Parliament.

>>216353676 (OP)
>Trusting the polls
Majority of Brits are either pro-Monarchy or don't see the point in getting rid of it. Republicanism is a fringe position in the UK

>>216353730
It's a big part of our cultural and national identity, not to mention it unifies people in a way politicians can't

>>216353730
Diddling kids

>>216354030
And protecting Jewish bankers

>>216353880
>monarchy bad because you have jewish bankers
Amazing argument for dismantling the lid on politicians
>>216353896
A strong monarchy means a weaker state. If you remove the monarch the state necessarily becomes stronger. Our liberties in this country exist purely because we have a monarch, unlike other countries where some cunts in suits sit around arbitrarily deciding what liberties people are entitled to. It's perfectly simple.

>>216353676 (OP)
looks like a very small but somewhat steady decline.

>>216353880
>Imagine typing these copes while Jewish bankers and merchants have been holding the entire Britain under their thumb since 1688.
Yeah?

>>216353917
The monarch is limited by parliament and parliament is limited by the monarchy. Its a balance. Obviously its a lot easier for parliament to be subversives and exercise their will against the monarchy. But the king/queen has the right to close parliament and veto laws i believe

>>216354066
>>216354085
Your monarchy has been an embarrassing joke since the execution of Charles I. Rehearsing the blabbering of the Parliament to justify their own consolidating of power is just proving my point.
William III was just the stooge of the Dutch and Jewish bankers and shareholders in the Hague, Amsterdam, and Rotterdam.
And if that wasn't enough Nathan Mayer Rothschild pulled a George Soros on the entire British economy from early 19th century who got the entire parliament in his pocket.

>>216354158
Okay, now do our parliament. Let's give them unrestrained power, yeah? You fucking spacker.

>>216354158
How so? William the III

>>216354158
*conviently forgets it was cromwell who invited the jews back*

>>216354198
>Comprehension level: 0
I'm literally saying you should get rid of the Parliament.
>>216354199
???
>>216354221
>A parliamentary brings back his coin friends
Yeah, and?
It seems you didn't understand my distaste of the Parliamentarians from my previous post.

>>216353794
No, but the government would most likely resign. In my opinion, that just means that those politicians should be executed.

>>216354324
No, you aren't 'literally saying' that. You should learn to express your positions clearly and intelligently instead of typing a load of slawm about jewish bankers.

>>216354402
>No, you aren't 'literally saying' that. You should learn to express your positions clearly and intelligently instead of typing a load of slawm about jewish bankers.
Nice try, Benjamin Disraeli.

>>216354066
>A strong monarchy means a weaker state.
Yet UK is one of the most authoritarian countries in the west.
And look at Saudi.
Mind you, I'd prefer a monarchy, but let's not kid ourselves here.

>>216354417
Indeed, that's sadly the irony. Just imagine how much worse this country would be if these rats were not limited by the crown. A strong monarch would at least have whipped them back into line. That's the flaw of a monarchy, it is in thrall to the personal ability of the monarch.

So what will happen to the royal family once the UK turns into a caliphate?

>>216353676 (OP)
that would be based, but we know britishers are cucks

>>216353820
>>216353759
>>216353718
You're a fucking retard who's fallen for royalist propaganda. The British royal family are controlled by Jews, specifically the Rothschilds.

>>216354605
Move to canada or Australia

>>216353759
then why do you niggas blame everything on politicians anyway lmao, how's that "limiting" working for you

>>216354913
>Elizabeth II hated israel but it was actually misdirection! Edward VIII was only pretending to be a nazi so he could give inside information to the rothschildes!

>>216354838
Didnt Bulgaria elected their former king as president?

>>216354958
No idea what point you're making.

>>216355020
The fact that british monarchy have been anti israel or anti semetic yet somehow controlled by the jews. There was no jewish loan to the royals like the pope took.

>>216355053
Why do the British royal family have Jewish bankers as advisors?

>>216354085
I know British people are not familiar with the concept, but that's literally the job of a president.

>>216353759
>whilst limiting the power of (((politicians)))?

You’re getting fucked harder than any of the republics around.

>>216353718
>THEY'RE RICH THEREBAD
but that's not the end of it
they're royals, which means by default they're inbred cunts who shouldn't even be considered more than the average farmer out in wessex or some shit
also they're retarded
they're a burden to society
and for the brit supremacists, well the family isn't even british
house of lords is retarded
>b-b-b-bu-
no I don't care, shut the fuck up retard
they're rapists and pedos like andrew who haven't gotten caught yet
there's much to hate, and only the biggest, most pathetic cucks simp for monarchies

>>216355682
Yes, my brown friend, that is so. Now imagine how much worse it would be if we had had president Blair. Or president Boris. Or president Starmer.

>>216355839
>*TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP TAP*

>>216355839
I have no fucking clue what is going on in that image

>>216353730
They are supposed to represent and uphold the cultural identity of a nation. Keywords: supposed to. Obviously most monarchs are doing a shit job lately. They are too timid to take action, too scared to take a stand in the era of moral outrage, and too easily distracted by hedonism.

>>216355918
I don't see how it would be different because the crown does nothing.

>>216353676 (OP)
Charles basically went full muzzie deepthroater, though he's already been one for decades but the public caught on. Maybe that's why the old Queen tried to stay alive for so long, she knew how traitorous he was.

Labor has also collapsed in terms of public support.

We might actually witness a revolt in our lifetime.

>>216355918
you idiotic mong, your argument thus far has been

>BUT IT WOULD BE WORSE IF X WASN'T AROUND TO DO Y
but X has never ever fucking done Y in recent history and it is entirely reasonable to assume it will never ever do Y again.

>>216353718
>They just look at them wearing expensive clothing and think 'THEY'RE RICH THEREFORE BAD'
they are correct and you're a coping midwit on top of the IQ bell curve

>>216356395
>why doesn't the king just kill politicians with the sword of state? HE ISN'T DOING ANYTHING!
What do you think Blair (an extreme revolutionary Trotskyist) would have done to this country if he hadn't had to get his changes and laws through the House of Lords and pass the reigning monarch? You're just another dimwit LARPer.

>>216353820
Maybe switch to a less poisonous glue

>>216356445
>>216356503
>you're DUMB
>you sniff GLUE!
Amazing arguments in favour of abandoning the bedrock upon which modern British society is built. Back to your porn, Grzegorz.

>>216356395
Idk about Australian politics but have you ever had a politician and thought oh yeah theyre great.

>>216356272
Simply not true is it

>>216354066
>A strong monarchy means a weaker state.
*laughs in french*

>>216355839
>well the family isn't even british
Bizarre how a lot of people aay this. Leftists mostly and then go on to describe someone like rishi sunak as british.
George I was german yes. He wasnt just some random guy, he had British family and was the (protestant) heir

If the Poms won't fight for King and Country, then it will be left to us.

>>216353730
Acts as a lightning rod for people who want dictatorial rule, since a portion of the people who would support a dictator instead support a monarch, who themselves doesn't want to be a dictator.

>>216356501
>tacking on the house of lords when we're talking about the royal family
>calling others dimwits
VERY embarrassing

>>216356547
>glue that holds the nation together
>use a better glue
>DARE YOU ACCUSE ME OF HUFFING GLUE? ZOUNDS! YOU ARE THE SMALLEST AND BASEST OF GODS CREATURES!

>>216356698
>then it will be left to us
to the guys who lost a war to fucking EMUS?

The problem its not the monarchy system but the king
And soon enough he will die or just get too tired and pass on the crown

>>216356547
>abandoning the bedrock upon which modern Bri'ish society is built
I'd argue you're completely insane and the bedrock is in fact ethnically and culturally homogeneous local communities, along with societal contracts, traditions, and ways of life, but such truths would be lost on the terminally retarded like you.

>>216353718
Your king is a bootlicker for islam and a literal traitor that is okay with the current state of the nation. Look who's the chairman of the BBC, appointed by the king himself
The only low IQ cattle here seems to be you

>>216356925
>The only low IQ cattle here seems to be you
i'm not the sharpest knife on the chandelier either

>>216356828
>along with societal contracts, traditions
Like the monarchy?

>>216353676 (OP)
this is actually only for very young people. the elderly really bring the number up

>>216354838
Being anti-Monarchy is the most cringe, r*ddit position

>>216354749
Does your meme also apply to Saville, a close friend of the royal family?

>>216354913
Fuck off zoomer historian
>>>/pol/

>>216354749
Does your meme also apply to Prince Andrew, a close friend of the royal family?

>>216353962
>48% want a monarchy
>52% want a republic
the UK public doesn't seem very unified

>>216355839
Cry harder, shitskin

>>216358331
Source?

>>216358278
Disingenuous argument. Saville was popular with most people when he was alive since most people didn't know he was a nonce

>>216358374
OP's post. Just scroll up dude

>>216358402
>In 1999, Charles visited Savile's Glen Coe home for a private meal and reportedly sent him gifts on his 80th birthday and a note reading: "Nobody will ever know what you have done for this country, Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that."
Do British enigmas also never age like ours?

>>216358448
Polls can't be trusted desu

>>216358480
>Nobody will ever know what you have done for this country, Jimmy. This is to go some way in thanking you for that."
You're taking that out of context. Charles was most likely thanking him for all the charity work he did

>>216358480
>reportedly

>>216353759
You're an actual retard. You do realize that in most republics in the west this exact role is done by the president?

>>216358842
And again what politician in the last 50years have you thought is so amazing and remarkable youd change youre entire culture and tradition for? For just another establishment stooge

>>216359008
An establishment stooge that your people can actually legally replace if they don't like him instead of having him and his family being born into wealth that is paid out of your pocket

>>216359008
>establishment stooge

It's cool if You like monarchies, personally i dont think they are useful but i don't live under one so whatever, but come on is there anything more establisment than fangirling over a centuries old institution because "muh traditions"?

>>216359008
royals are politicians chud, except that you can't fire them by voting

I can't tell if bongs are retarded goy cattle or if the rumors that the royals pull all the strings behind closed doors are true. Either way it is baffling how a cunt known for the 1984 novel uses it as a handbook lmao.

>>216356925
>the king is a bad king therefore you need to replace the entire foundation of your country with a republic
I really wish brown retards would learn when to not pipe up.

>>216358842
>you do realise that you can have kind of, sort of the same system but headed by a cunty little careerist in a suit instead of the Defender of the Realm?

>>216359145
>>216359151
Happens all the time anyway at least they do stuff rather than some billionaire or some tony blair like character. They're intrinsically tied to the country and land. Theyre not just going to serve 4years and then go and work for goldman sachs

>>216362055
>goldman sachs
Nice antisemitic dogwhistle. Asshole

>>216359392
Its only a matter of time before you guys get another Cromwell. I wouldn't be surprised if America has to overthrow your government sometime in the next decade or two.

Tell 'em Chris!

>>216359392
I never said that you dumb bongoloid

>>216362055
>They're intrinsically tied to the country and land.
The wealthy elitists aren't tied to any country anymore.

>>216353730
Look if you want to be a first world country you need to have an entrenched upper class that has no real way of being removed from power that molests children and steals your money, I don't make the rules that's just how it is

>>216362598
the american military can't stop dropping jets in the ocean and hasn't won a war in years its not overthrowing anyone

>>216371170
Thanks for the input Judenstein

>>216371499
the american military supports israel and lets them freely sink their boats with no retaliation so this comment doesn't make sense

>>216353730
They're just the British Kardashians. A total waste of space

>>216353820
What glue? All they do is bring browns over and destroy your social fabric. Also Your royal family is german. You haven't had an anglo-saxxon king since 1066 AD my nigga
>>216353962
You can unify yourself by deporting all the browns

>>216353718
They don't even know what the apparatus of state is for, how the fuck would you expect them to know what the monarchy is for?

>>216353730
It's a legitimisation mechanic for the regime, it's worked for centuries.

>>216371524
>The American military is to weak to help their fellow white countries, but you still need to help us against Iran goy!
They pull this shit every time. We are supposedly hyper incompetent and should just give up but we are also the strongest military and should only try when it comes to saving Israel. All part of the demoralization

>>216353751
this. im starting to see it here as well, the royal family hold and judge their own to a higher standard than any politcian has ever done.
they basicly stand to loose it all at every election but are also stricktly not allowed to be political or campain for themself in any way, they can only hope to survive by being someone we want in such position. if we dont then suddenly the party that campain for dismantling the monarchy wins and they end up on the street.

>>216353759
>limiting the power of (((politicians)))
Lmaooooo