Thread 6892

I know I'm in good contact with you fellas, my /co/ janitor friends, but felt the need to put this here because this is a rather elusive issue.
There is an individual who will seize any opportunity to interject Nature Cat. Sometimes seamlessly and in an on-topic seeming manner, but mostly awkwardly and tenuously. That is the principle characterisation of this individual.
I can also (weakly) characterise this individual by the specific set of images they pick.
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/image/kxA8Z1NKQpU08XhuOw5YMg/
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/image/iJX2d5VVB38YFpMVyFbQRg/
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/image/vhC-rXQ9154_QcuXnE1-kA/
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/image/1As6E8gkeb_IKV_kbgQBiA/
https://desuarchive.org/co/search/image/kYK7oBnFknOBd8M3I4g-6A/
As it stands currently, this is a developing issue. This stuff isn't really being reported at the moment because I suppose it's quite recent or stealthy, so as a consequence I haven't been able frequently request bans on this individual in order to profile them as an 'evader' (and simply put note them in the evaders thread >>1697) or the like.
Regardless of that, wishing to speak as an anon and not just a janitor, I've been finding this behaviour mainly in threads I browse. Found it a little funny at first, but then it just became annoying. Do not wish for a death of a thousand cuts on an otherwise great board.

So be wary of naturecatfag. Thank you.

I'm going to follow up this up and address grammarfag eventually.

Was told grammarfag has already been addressed with mod team, so nevermind.

>>6892 (OP)
Is it ok to necro this as a /co/ janny general?

>>8204
Yeah sure.

Ok so is there a general gameplan about what to do with all the trans shitposting? It keeps coming up and derailing multiple theads.

>>8246
That's the entire website, not just /co/. Nothing to be done about it except what we normally do.

>>8248
that image... perfect!

>>8259
you are perfect :)