Thread 63790648

Part 1
https://rumble.com/v6ucv0r

Part 2
https://rumble.com/v6ucvwd

Part 3
https://rumble.com/v6ucw87

Part 4
https://rumble.com/v6ucwhf

scalable design-agnostic manufacturing for complex structure vehicles and components

>>63790648 (OP)
How does this benefit me?

cool you can 3d print the shell of a cruise missile, the cheapest part. now tell me where you're gonna get the payload, the engine and the guidance system?

saying tannerite = low quality post.

>>63790648 (OP)
>mfw IRL contemporary warfare turned out to be like one of Ace Combat 7's plot points except it's even more lame and gay than Reddit Combat, and trust me it takes some serious effort to be lamer and gayer than AC

>>63790648 (OP)
>trying to create a Storm Shadow on the cheap instead of just copying the Shasneeds, a cruise missile designed to be cheap and easily producible
sure

>>63790657
>18:38:43
Well (You) posted four minutes after the 45-minute interview was posted onto /k/ Catalog so there's no telling

>>63790648 (OP)
and? the airframe is the cheapest and simplest part of the missile

>>63790662
There are rockets with 3d printed engines

>>63790662
Taylor Wilson

why not just make the V-1 pulsejet? the nazis could make them with slave labour, under constant bombing with material shortages at that.

>>63790662
Methanol plus sulfuric acid produces dimethyl sulfate, which is almost as lethal as sarin.

>>63790662
I want to design an injection molded ramjet motor. It wouldn't be compatible with this aeroshell though.

Are there hard limits on cost optimizing the guidance system? MEMS chips cost practically nothing, although off the shelf ones probably don't have the required precision.

3D PRINTING IS SHIT

>>63791118
>'the shell' Hurr Durr
>and
Did you watch the interview?
This is not merely about "muh airframe" or cruise missiles
Far broader and greater wider implications for manufacturing and mass production.

is /k/ nothing but midwits?

>>63791833
It's not just midwits. It's also AIs pretending to be midwits.

>>63791833
I'm not watching your hour long marketing material, post a proper summary next time

>>63791915
>i-i don't have attention span hurr durr
ok zoomer

>"muh proper summary"
picrel, go back
(or why not have AI do it for (You) slopfaggotardtranny)

>>63791582
ok say that after a cruise missile hits (You) in the face

>>63791582
GUESS WHAT MOTHERFUCKER YOU GOT RID OF THE TOOLMAKING TRADE AS WELL AS FITTERS AND TURNERS.

'SERVICE ECONOMY' YOU SAID

THE ONLY ONES LEFT HAVE TO FIGURE OUT HOW TO TURN YOUR 3D PRINTED PIECES OF SHIT TO MAKE THEM NOT SUCK SO MUCH.

>>63791990
That's a big part of what is discussed in the OP interview vids.
Everyone here should watch this
especially machinists / gun manufacturers, anyone in mechanical-industrial engineering or manufacturing

>>63791994
Why should I watch that, as a WEDM guy. Tell me why specifically I should watch that as the jobs pile up around me.

>>63792016
Kill (You)rself NOW.
DO IT NOW. kys

>>63792042
You immediately start crying upon coming across someone who uses a reductive process?

Typical.

>>63792082
Ok then don't learn and watch, educate (You)rself from the interview
Idgafmf (flyingmotherfuck)

You cannot 3d print engines and guidance. That's all that matters.

>>63792089
>engines and guidance
Correct, which is why those (types) of components, systems manufacturing will not be "replaced" by AI
A ring laser gyroscope can't be "3D printed"
A turbofan engine can't be "3D printed"

Watch the video interview though. Many engineering procedures of design and testing, *can* be replaced by AI. It can produce huge cost and time savings in the engineering design and testing overall
This type of technology is going to revolutionize many sectors of aerospace, mechanical, and electrical/electronics engineering.

>>63792115
But not tool making. It can't do shit with toolmaking. Tool making is still the most efficient thing, and is irreplicable.

>>63792138
>muh toolmaking
Watch the full video
it'll blow (You)r peabrain

>>63792143
It hasn't, it's sad laughable hubris.

It's actually disgusting how little people understand the trade.

I know something of how AI learns.
Guess what?
It's nothing to do with how you make decent multistage press tools. Absolutely. Nothing.

So to me you're coming off like those fruits who duped people about scaling being a solution to AGI.

>>63792164
>multistage press tools
The technologies discussed in the interview, are—in time—going to simply eliminate the need for toolmaking and tools altogether in several industries and manufacturing processes.

>coming off hurr durr
I'm a skeptic on a lot of this AI / 3D printing stuff. But the OP video presentation is the most convincing I have ever seen, that a new future has arrived. It's using LLM AI for the real "tool" "making" purposes, subordinate to human control requirements, that boost productivity efficiency and reduce costs for some of the most laborious and time consuming (or repetitive) sectors of manufacturing.

>>63792181
No, it won't replace that, because it consumes more expensive material with more energy and takes more time to do it. This is the economic, material and mechanical reality.

This will not change, because it physically cannot change.

Anyone industry-side can tell you this.

>I'm a skeptic on a lot of this AI / 3D printing stuff.

No you're not, you've linked some of the worst videos on the subject matter a single person can ever watch, and you're convinced. It is the content equivalent of vomiting in someone's lap. Also you have no idea what toolmaking even is, or what it truly involves, or you would never have written those sentences.

>>63792201
>content equivalent of vomiting
Correct that is (You)r uploaded posts itt.

>no idea what toolmaking
Apparently (You) do not. I'm a PE

>would never have written
(You) need to go back to plebbit all (You)r spew itt is from there

>more expensive material with more energy and takes more time
Economies of scale.
Future / Past
Anyway (You) know *absolutely nothing* of Industrial Engineering which, yeh I know, is an actual field

>>63792207
>PE

So confirmed for knowing nothing. Enjoy.

>>63792241
Watch the video and critique its contents point-by-point in detail.
Otherwise stfu (and be left in the dust)

It’s shocking to me how easily the public buys the AI hype. I’m a high-IQ so maybe that only seems strange to me but to a common person they really do think it’s like an imaginary friend, or a techno-fairy or something. I understand what AI is, it’s literally just a next-gen search engine. All those models can do is regurgitate what data is put into them. So, if your a low-IQ "engineer" who’s work is Google searching topics to figure out how something is supposed to work and apply the correct formula, then AI is great because it’s a more advanced Google search. But if you’re making something new than AI is useless because it doesn’t have useful data in its model.

>>63792115
>A turbofan engine can't be "3D printed"
Fuck you I'm going to make a shitty 3d printed wood fired turbofan just to prove you wrong.

>>63792856
Wasn't there a dude that made one out of a soda can?

>>63791507
IIRC you can't guide an explosive that is propelled without licenses you can't have.

>>63790810
What a normal speed of a cruise missile?
What a normal warhead size of a cruise missile?
Why are you retarded?

>>63792856
I screencapped this post.

B U M P

.

>>63791439
Range is too low to be useful.

>>63792089
>guidance
"Guidance" is literally a $129 brick of Chinesium. It's the cheapest and simplest part nowadays.

B U M P

>>63790662
>where you're gonna get the payload, the engine and the guidance system?
hobbyist R/C drone parts. A missile is just a fixed wing drone with a rocket engine. oh which hobby rocket engines can be purchased or handmade (rocket candy)
>payload
who cares for a payload other than a camera?

>>63792115
>A turbofan engine can't be "3D printed"
turbofan blades are 3d printed.

>>63793741
>What a normal speed of a cruise missile?
400mph
>What a normal warhead size of a cruise missile?
250lbs

>>63791499
>Sarin
The dane cook of nerve gasses? So what, V series or bust

>>63801634
Some of them are.
>"blades"
specifically what-which are (You) referring to?

/k/ needs to watch this interview
(it is not solely about 3D printing or cruise missiles)

>>63790648 (OP)
“Using A.I. We Generated The Most Advanced Design Possible”

Absolutely retarded approach and optimizing the wrong problem.
What they should be designing is a cruise missile factory that can shit out a cruise missile shell in 3 seconds like a car factory can shit out stamped sheet metal panels for a car in 3 seconds.
3d printing this terrible shape and assembling it is WAY too much work and takes way too long.
It's the opposite of engineered for manufacturing.

t. engineer who gets paid shittons to de-retard designs and re-design them for manufacturing after retards like that guy "design" some trash with "AI" (lmao)

>>63790648 (OP)
Ya'll ever imagine what it would be like, to make a claymore, but using prince Rupert drops?

>>63790648 (OP)
>3D PRINTED
>scalable
pick one

>>63803546
Oh you mean the most fucked aspect of the videos? The things that industry and the citizen should be avoiding like the plague?
Not only the deeply flawed methodology of the industrial process, but the flawed methodology of the delivery of information?

>>63804740
I think you're the same person.

So much of this thread reads as one person's attempt at degrading the quality of the board as a whole. So many /k/ threads read like this now. Bring up particular subject matter in order to degrade users perception of it.

>>63804798
>help IQ140 poster is degrading my IQ80 nonce board

lmao

>>63804767
flick the tail and watch them shatter, its of no use

>>63804740
>3d printing this terrible shape and assembling it is WAY too much work and takes way too long
None of that is what OP video interview presentation says or does, at all whatsoever.
The opposite
It's about using AI to cut down on and reduce time/cost of engineering design, testing, fitment and procurement of individual parts and subsystems. Obtaining an optimal design for parts and the overall product that is right the first production run, and saves a lot of time and money to get there

>engineered for manufacturing
That's precisely what OP presentation is demonstrating.
Did you watch the same video we did?

>de-retard designs
Yes (You) may ? get paid to do that.
OP video is supposed to eliminate that entire step.
Is that why (You)'re butthurt?

>>63804771
isn't that in OP vid referring to the AI engineering design aspect?
RE: 3D printing the filament feedstock can be switched out depending on required application spec

>>63804967
Consider that you know nothing about engineering and i know everything about it.

>>63804771
Have you not heard of 3D printing farms?

>>63809759
>'I-I'm the professional expert not u'
>i know everything
Back to plebbit, brainlet.

>>63804740
What did you study/specialize in, and what kind of industry experience did you obtain before getting to this point? Your job sounds based af

>t. Mechatronics diploma student

>>63809791
>Have you not heard of 3D printing farms?
"how do we scale production of something we made via a method that's meant for rapid prototyping but terrible for mass production?"
"durrr, let's just use 100 of those machines so we can make it 100x as fat!"

stupid

>>63813867
bachelor in mechanical engineering
master in manufacturing technologies

/k/ needs to watch this interview
it is not solely about 3D printing or cruise missiles

>>63804771
My friend, the current military production methods and scale for cruise missiles is orders of magnitude worse than what 3D printing can handle

>>63818402
maybe in Russia

the interview is about a lot more than just 3D printing / cruise missiles

>>63790662
It wouldn't be hard to create a SCUD missile from this.
But even if you rigged it up with propellors and flew it into someone's house without an explosive it still sends a message.

>>63790662
A lot of sausage, a lot of piss, a lot of shit, and a few too many trips to home depot to go undetected but you lose a few things chasing a dream.