>>63846119Veterans having a higher employment rate than civies means nothing without greater context.
First off, to be a veteran in the first place, you have to be employable. That automatically filters out all of the retards, downies and spergs.
Second, to be a veteran, you have to have a minimum level of education, needing at least a GED, again filtering out a large number of underperformers.
Then the affirmative action needs to be taken into account; in the public sector there are employment quotas that favor veterans in the hiring queue, and private sector companies love using feel-good stories about hiring veterans as marketing material, so it's a shoe-in.
And then it's the GI bill that allows many veterans, who otherwise would not have, to complete degrees in higher education, such that they are disproportionately educated compared to the statistical average.
None of these are bad things, but notice I never had to fall back on "muh discipline" and "muh esprit de corps" to explain this situation; there are factors that control our lives to a far greater degree than we ourselves can control it.