← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 63844962

24 posts 6 images /k/
Anonymous No.63844962 [Report] >>63844967 >>63845317 >>63846557 >>63846867 >>63848030 >>63848922
he did nothing wrong
Anonymous No.63844967 [Report] >>63844973
>>63844962 (OP)
It looks super neat. I'd love to drive one around and blow something up with it.
Anonymous No.63844973 [Report]
>>63844967
id go hunting hogs with it
Anonymous No.63844990 [Report] >>63844998 >>63846192
LOL did they actually make any new hulls or just repaint the old ones from the '90s?
Anonymous No.63844998 [Report] >>63845009 >>63845025 >>63845080
>>63844990
The 90's ?
I thought the m10 booker was relatively new.
But then again 1990 was just 20 years ago.
Anonymous No.63845009 [Report]
>>63844998
Anon, I...
Anonymous No.63845025 [Report]
>>63844998
Uh, sorry anon, but the 90s were only 10 years ago
Anonymous No.63845080 [Report] >>63845097
>>63844998
Thats not the Booker tho
Anonymous No.63845097 [Report]
>>63845080
yes, its not a booker
it seems like i foolishly posted a mockup
Anonymous No.63845124 [Report] >>63845134 >>63845135 >>63846512
should have been unmanned
Anonymous No.63845134 [Report]
>>63845124
How are all our vehicles not already unmanned at this point?
Anonymous No.63845135 [Report]
>>63845124
I'm sure there's some all-female tank crews out there
Anonymous No.63845317 [Report] >>63845363
>>63844962 (OP)
Already back from your /pol/ vaction, warriortard?
Anonymous No.63845363 [Report] >>63846517 >>63847369
>>63845317
What?
Anonymous No.63846192 [Report]
>>63844990
It's based on the ASCOD chassis, and a distant cousin of the British Ajax
Anonymous No.63846512 [Report]
>>63845124
Best i can do is 5 Mexicans
Anonymous No.63846517 [Report]
>>63845363
Why did you get an ad for your fanfic?
Anonymous No.63846557 [Report]
>>63844962 (OP)
I agree
However, I dislike all the bolts sticking out. It simply looks unclean
Anonymous No.63846867 [Report] >>63847280
>>63844962 (OP)
Someone explain to me why they didn't just put a 105 on a modified Bradley or AMPV?
Anonymous No.63847280 [Report]
>>63846867
Brcause muh weight(it wasnt light enough anyway) muh training compatibility with Abrams(it didnt help anyway), muh speed and maneuverability(it wasnt any better)
Anonymous No.63847369 [Report]
>>63845363
Don't mind me, just posting in a dead warriortard thread.
Anonymous No.63848030 [Report]
>>63844962 (OP)
Is this an m8?
Anonymous No.63848043 [Report]
genuinely what the fuck were they on while building these things

literally fulfilled none of the requirements and got ordered anyway
Anonymous No.63848922 [Report]
>>63844962 (OP)
The only thing he did wrong was lose the airbone capacity... :(((