>>63844962 (OP)It looks super neat. I'd love to drive one around and blow something up with it.
>>63844967id go hunting hogs with it
LOL did they actually make any new hulls or just repaint the old ones from the '90s?
>>63844990The 90's ?
I thought the m10 booker was relatively new.
But then again 1990 was just 20 years ago.
>>63844998Uh, sorry anon, but the 90s were only 10 years ago
>>63845080yes, its not a booker
it seems like i foolishly posted a mockup
should have been unmanned
>>63845124How are all our vehicles not already unmanned at this point?
>>63845124I'm sure there's some all-female tank crews out there
>>63844962 (OP)Already back from your /pol/ vaction, warriortard?
>>63844990It's based on the ASCOD chassis, and a distant cousin of the British Ajax
>>63845124Best i can do is 5 Mexicans
>>63845363Why did you get an ad for your fanfic?
>>63844962 (OP)I agree
However, I dislike all the bolts sticking out. It simply looks unclean
>>63844962 (OP)Someone explain to me why they didn't just put a 105 on a modified Bradley or AMPV?
>>63846867Brcause muh weight(it wasnt light enough anyway) muh training compatibility with Abrams(it didnt help anyway), muh speed and maneuverability(it wasnt any better)
>>63845363Don't mind me, just posting in a dead warriortard thread.
genuinely what the fuck were they on while building these things
literally fulfilled none of the requirements and got ordered anyway
>>63844962 (OP)The only thing he did wrong was lose the airbone capacity... :(((