>>63851259>Perun>His stuff is well researchedIt seems well researched, it actually isn't. Really early during ukraine conflict people started posting him and I dismantled one video where he dipped into my area of expertise, and it was clear he has no clue what he's on about.
He's the kinda guy who reads a bit of wikipedia, some defense blogs from some absolute nonces, and then fabricates a narrative that sounds convincing, but that's pretty far removed of reality.
Like literally fake news, but from a different angle. He's on the same level of quality as a discovery channel documentary but he manages to hide that better than they used to.
His lack of quality is super obvious when you consider that he's 1 guy in a basement and covers dozens of topics which would require a dozen of experts to cover properly.
I cannot dismantle all of his videos credibly, since i'm only a subject matter expert in some areas he covers, but everything he has done on topics i have professional experience in are atrocious.
So you guess if the rest are good or not.
He also has the good sense to go with mainstream sentiment and lay things out as pro-ukraine as possible, so if you refute him people just label you pro-russian even if you have zero investment in the conflict and simply care about the facts.
To most people here it is unthinkable that the russians do anything competently at all, so you're forbidden to mention when they have a moment of clarity when the vodka ran out and did something proper for a change.