Thread 63857228

How would you destroy this Iranian underground nuclear site?

>>63857228 (OP)
Bomb entenaces and set up air blockade. Bomb the shit out of any car entering area.

Raid it like Splinter Cell with cool tier 1 operator platoons

>>63857228 (OP)
Just go in with a couple hundred gyys and room2room it. Scientists can't fight hard and there might be war brides inside.

Does this facility have a generator?

>>63857228 (OP)
Dig through the mountain with bunker busters. Eventually, a few billion of American taxpayer dollars later, you should reach the centrifuges.

Tunnel below and place dynamite, like in Worms:Armageddon

Have an average American shart on it.

>>63857228 (OP)
Massive air assault to capture the whole site plus a secure perimeter and airfield (build one if you have to)
Occupy the site, destroy everything of value, kidnap/kill all surviving staff, systematically demolish the whole facility and then pull out leaving only ashes and rubble behind

>>63857228 (OP)
Tom Cruise already made a whole-ass movie about it

small diameter bomb the same area 20 times everyday until Chuck E Cheese utters the word Poggers again

>>63857228 (OP)
Bomb bunch of hospitals and children's schools

>>63857315
#3 is coming out based in Iran.

This is going to be like Osama Bin Laden's super sekrit mountain fortress

Also if Iran truly has nukes it's time to lob them or lose them forever

>>63857228 (OP)
Solid snake

>>63857228 (OP)
bomb the centrifuges with about 5 MOPs in the same location to get down to 80m depth. i mean realistically what else do u do...

>>63857354
Well you could go full regime change mode, kill the entire Islamic Republic leadership, replace them with the Shah, and just stroll in the front door. If you don't want to do all that work though then yeah, MOPs are going to be easier.

>>63857228 (OP)
Oh, God, we're at the infographics stage of this new K.ike war...

>>63857228 (OP)
Bomb the entrances and fart in an air duct.

>>63857373
why are you censoring it faggot

>>63857228 (OP)
If you don't have GBU-57s and nukes are off the table, the next best thing seems like collapsing the entrance and taking out any exterior ventilation/power supply connections. Of course, if you're Israel and your goal is to stop Iran from nuking you, you'd probably do just as well by continuing the campaign of targeting ballistic missile launch sites/storage bases, since a warhead is useless without a viable delivery method.

>>63857228 (OP)
Weaponized moles

>>63857380
Helps deter the K.ike jannie censorship scripts.

Shoot at civilians in food queues with MBT main guns. Wait for a chimpout to draw Americans into the war.
>https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-tank-shelling-kills-45-people-awaiting-aid-trucks-gaza-ministry-says-2025-06-17/
If that doesn't work just false flag one of their ships. That tunnel is going to be gone in no time.

>>63857441
>gaza-ministry-says

>>63857441
This story has been debunked.

>>63857441
>>63857523

>>63857523
that does not disprove individual accounts of the event, only that the video could not be a recording of the event

>>63857523
>>63857539
>>63857441
Why the fuck is this even being discussed on /k/? Even if it were true no one gives a fuck about dead civilians.

>>63857228 (OP)
spray it with about 10 kilograms of per fentanyl mixed into a few thousand gallons of water.

>>63857585
It shows that the only shred of objective evidence of the event ever happening is complete bunk.

>>63857289
You're not occupying shit dumbasses, it's a heavily guarded and monitored facility in the middle of Iran, the best you can hope for is some suicide mission bullshit which would also most likely fail because they're a few dudes entering a huge guarded facility with questionable intel on the layout with the task of destroying it all.
Meal Team Six couldn't take on even a raghead compound in a neutral country guarded by a few terrorists without crashing the super sikrit stealth copter. You would have to do some Battle of Crete shit with thousands of paratroopers with the expectation that they won't be getting out.

>>63857228 (OP)
Do what they did last time by leaving random USB sticks labelled "Bobs & Vagene" "Sekrit Dokuments" and "Snake 2" in the employee smoking area that infect the computers with digital crack that make the centrifuges turn into blenders.

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/heres-how-cia-and-mossad-disrupted-irans-nuclear-program-using-a-computer-virus/articleshow/113545993.cms?from=mdr

>>63857621
>Meal Team Six

Import millions of Muslims

>>63857228 (OP)
>How would you destroy this Iranian underground nuclear site

I wouldn't. Bomb the entrances and infrastructure around it then keep bombing all vehicles in the area.

>>63857228 (OP)
drop a rbmk reactor on it

>>63857289
>massive air assault
logistically speaking you'd pretty much be talking light infantry + air support. I don't really see how you could get anything more substantial on the ground without a full ground invasion of the country. What size of a force would you need to raid a place like that?

>>63858591
Depends on what forces Iran has in the area and how loyal and/or receptive to bribery those forces are. That's a question for Mossad, CIA, and DIA.

>>63858230
>Import millions of Muslims
It's Iran, Islam has already done it's damage there, so that wouldn't be effective at all.

>>63857228 (OP)
Pay off indian/nigerian/russian shill factories to launch massive subversion campaigns against Iran's leadership and watch it crumble.

>>63857228 (OP)
You put a Chernobyl core on top and let it China-syndrome its way to the good stuff and then drop in a tactical nuke to clean up the radiation.

I'll tell you but before that I need 60,000,000 shekels plus tip

>>63857627
Imagine hat inspection.

Do you think mossad has actual ground force/infiltration groups to deal with it?

>>63858925
Speaking of: does Israel's immigration department have penis inspection?

>>63858623
I have better idea, launch massive amounts of Indians in to Iran

>>63858939
They unquestionably have various glowing nose groups in country already, but I doubt they have nearly enough assets in place for something like that. If it were me making the call, and MOPs were either off the table or proved ineffective, I'd want at least a couple companies worth of guys at an absolute minimum. Far more than any typical SOF type group rolls with.

>>63857228 (OP)
Tom Cruise and F-18s

>>63857333
>Also if Iran truly has nukes it's time to lob them or lose them forever
"We will soon reveal a weapon more sophisticated than drones, missiles and nuclear technology that will change everything" - Iran

>>63859130
>the flag has been raised and the ass is in the ass
>soon everyone will know everything

>>63859130
They launched it and it smacked down in bumfuckville jordan

>>63859173
That wasn't 'tonight'. That was in the afternoon.

>>63859130
YOU TOO CAN JOIN THE EPIC GAME RAID: SHADOW LEGENDS. BATTLE WITH PEOPLE ALL OVER THE WORLD.

Impressive on paper but this works if you put your underground bunkers in igneous rock layers, or, if you don't have that or you're too poor, hard limestone or something like that.

Who wants to bet the theocratical middle eastern shithole decided to skimp out on that?

>>63857593
the youths minds need to be shape to fifth for foreign interest in the Middle East

Why can't Israel simply push MOPs out of the back of a cargo plane. They're big but not *that" big?

>>63859349
no air supremacy.
slow and low-flying cargo plane and needed tankers will be spotted and shot down by shorad long before reaching fordo.

>>63859349
because then they would have to pay for them. americans dropping bombs out of our planes is paid for out of tax payer dollars

>>63857278
Working within the Qom Formation which is down to the 300 meters the base is buried composed of fossiliferous limestone. Tensile strength is probably around 6MPa, which is pretty weak for rock. Should be able to tear some pretty big holes in it until you get deep enough for a GBU57 assuming the US authorizes a B2 strike.
Keep in mind the GBU57 is able to penetrate up to 8 meters of 60MPa reinforced concrete before the program to improve the penetrative power of the weapon in the early 2010s. Fossiliferous limestone will probably have similar compressive strength, so you'd want to burrow with explosives in an attempt to overcome the tensile strength until you hit 10 or so meters for the GBU.
Israel could accomplish this with chains of bombs, which I believe they've done before. It would be a long endeavor though and I'm not sure if it's realistic to do it, especially with exploded sediment collapsing back into the hole.

>>63860338
Assuming they have AA in reserve, fakeout the base with slow drones and decoys with radar reflectors and even actual expendable RC cargo planes until every radar and AA asset exposes itself to waiting strike craft and is blown to shreds. Then apparent decoy flight #10 or #20 drops the busters.
If that any or other dumb idea sounds overelaborate, Israel has had decades to plan for this specific target.

bunch of thermobaric bombs as deep as you can get them thru the entrance tunnel should do the trick right

>>63858591
Dunno but my plan is big airborne raid to secure and/or build an airfield, then flying dickloads of light armoured vehicles, ATGMs and drones to supplement air power in holding the perimeter while the facility is seized and demolished
I could see a full airborne division being required for something like this, in an operation lasting several weeks

>>63857228 (OP)
Use a combination of a GBU-57 massive ordnance penetrator and several more GBU-57 massive ordnance penetrators to massively penetrate the mountain until the 150 feet of rock collapse and the centrifuges built into the mountains are all leaky and radioactive.

The Iranian underground nuke sites have been a thing for a long time, I bet the USAF has a black budget bunker buster cooked up to handle it. Could be narrow-body exotic iridium alloy penetrator with rocket boosters, etc.

>>63857228 (OP)
Mole people or rods from god, the Jews are known to have both

>>63860606
Ground forces are the one thing Iran has actually got, landing troops enables them to go Best Korea mode and zerg rush you with infantry, especially if you sit there for weeks. They probably have as many as they can fit inside and around that base right now to protect from the saner quick raid option.
You can say you have air superiority so you can rain death from above at will, and Iranian troops will only have so much tolerance for that, but you're at the edge of where Israeli air can reach and they can only fly so many sorties to do that and to land shit at your airfield in the middle of Iran.

>>63860524
You don't have to blow up the centrifuges, collapsing the bunker works too.

>How would you destroy this Iranian underground nuclear site?

I wouldn't. I would allow them to continue their nuclear programme and then let both Iran and Israel destroy each other, then by virtue of the nuclear umbrella counter force strike what's left in either country.

>>63860667
No shit. Unless you know the tunnel shape, how it's reinforced, the distance of the explosion from the tunnel, the force of the explosive and how S and P waves are translated through limestone, that doesn't help anyone in this thread propose a solution.
I can answer maybe two of those. By all means, go ahead if you know more.

>>63857228 (OP)
If America is willing to do it, let them use their ayyy lmao tech to destroy it.

If not, probably bomb Iranian communication hubs over several days, monitor all communications coming from Fordrow, have the Americans waffle back and forth on will they wont they while you perform increasing disinformation campaigns in Iran via deepfakes.

Eventually just insert commando's into Fordrow, mimic the outgoing comms via some AI wizardry, don't tell anyone while the conversation is still will they wont they and then once done and out announce it.

I think that's sufficiently Yiddish enough to be realistic.

>>63860584
that is both lot more risky than attempting to pressure, beg, bribe, or blackmail the Americans into sending B-2s to do the job and a lot less likely to work considering conservative assessments seem to think it might take at least two of the big bastards dropped right on top of one another to do it.

>>63860831
Sure but we already know that's Plan A because we see them doing that right now.
Since they've been worrying about this target for decades it's hard to believe they never made a backup plan in case the day came and America was simply too isolationist/leftist/busy to agree. (Unless one believes America is ZOG or whatever).

>>63860746
>If America is willing to do it, let them use their ayyy lmao tech to destroy it.
probably the best solution. this is a shit sandwich Israel has dumped on our plate, but i think it will only get worse at this point if its left to fester. If the Iranians were actually negotiating in good faith before, which I don't think anyone actually believes but lets just say for the sake of the argument that they were, I think they will think they have no choice now but to pursue nuclear weapons if only for deterrence against further Israeli attacks. That's also assuming if they did hypothetically manage to develop a nuclear weapon that their death cult of a religion wouldn't just lead to them taking the first opportunity to attempt to nuke Israel. The question comes down to has Israel accomplished enough to prevent the Iranians from developing a working weaponization program, or have they only delayed it? My gut leans more toward it being the latter.

>>63859130
I hate this shit. "Yeah bro we have super secret ultra weapons" "yeah bro we are gonna fuck up israel and it will be remembered for centuries" just do it already instead of xeeting about it holy fuck

We already had the whole movie about a situation like this.

>>63861049
Would their plan really work though?
Can F/A-18s carry anything heavy enough to penetrate the facility? Would a sortie big enough to carry enough shit to do the job make it there without being detected?

>>63857228 (OP)
OOK OOK NOOK

How do you make sure you’ve actually destroyed it after the big boom booms if no surface evidence is available?

>>63857266
It would be hilarious if they put it in the support building.

>>63857285
It wouldn't surprise me one bit to find out that Israel had secretly built a tunnel to it over the last 25 years. Totally on brand for them.

>>63857624
This was a good one. I think the pagers moved to the top, but this was really funny.

>>63860663
You're not wrong about this being an insanely risky op, but I think Iran is weak enough and Israel strong enough to pull it off
More importantly, I just don't see how else they can make absolutely sure the facility is destroyed

1. Trigger an artificial earthquake of such magnitude that the soil and rock is liquified causing the facility to sink from its own weight and bury itself.

2. Nuke it

>>63857523
>>63857539
The IDF has admitted to it from its own reporting and is investigating:
https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/israeli-tank-shelling-kills-45-people-awaiting-aid-trucks-gaza-ministry-says-2025-06-17/

>>63858616
Importing millions more Sunnis into a Shia dominated nation with a million niche ethnicities would do more damage than you think. I'd hazard that might even be the idea given what Israel has already tried to do with the Druze in Syria.

>>63861217
The real question for Bibi is, WHY would you make sure you’ve actually destroyed it? Iran's imminent nuclear threat has been his one trick since 1996.

>>63861984
>The IDF has admitted to it from its own reporting and is investigating:
Your linked article says nothing of the sort.

>>63861224
Im pretty sure you could convince Ted Cruz that there is a Hamas-tunnel going from Gaza to Teheran

Israel already lost, they drag it for too long.

>>63857228 (OP)
falseflag and sink one of the US destroyers, consequences will follow

>>63857228 (OP)
I'd trigger the samson option and Hannibal directive everyone who replies to this post.
Also, drop a kinetic payload deployed from orbit if you actually want an answer.

>Trump caution on Iran strike linked to doubts over ‘bunker buster’ bomb, officials say
>The effectiveness of GBU-57s has been a topic of deep contention at the Pentagon since the start of Trump’s term, according to two defense officials who were briefed that perhaps only a tactical nuclear weapon could be capable of destroying Fordow because of how deeply it is buried.
>Trump is not considering using a tactical nuclear weapon on Fordow and the possibility was not briefed by defense secretary Pete Hegseth and the chairman of the joint chiefs of staff Gen Dan Caine in meetings in the White House situation room, two people familiar with the matter said.
>But the defense officials who received the briefing were told that using conventional bombs, even as part of a wider strike package of several GBU-57s, would not penetrate deep enough underground and that it would only do enough damage to collapse tunnels and bury it under rubble.
>Those in the briefing heard that completely destroying Fordow, which Israeli intelligence estimates to go down as far as 300ft (90 metres), would require the US to soften the ground with conventional bombs and then ultimately drop a tactical nuclear bomb from a B2 bomber to wipe out the entire facility, a scenario Trump is not considering.

Will we see a nuclear strike in our lifetimes?

>>63862028
>Israeli military acknowledges firing, says it is investigating
>In a statement, the Israel Defense Forces said: "Earlier today, a gathering was identified adjacent to an aid distribution truck that got stuck in the area of Khan Younis, and in proximity to IDF troops operating in the area. "The IDF is aware of reports regarding a number of injured individuals from IDF fire following the crowd’s approach. The details of the incident are under review. The IDF regrets any harm to uninvolved individuals and operates to minimise harm as much as possible to them while maintaining the safety of our troops."

>>63861984
I get a distinct feeling it's going the way of Ryanggang, another "haha you can get us" installation that one day was magically destroyed in a "criticality accident" with curiously no airborne radionuclides detected after the explosion. That and Trump won't shut the fuck out about "muh superweapon". I don't think an MOP or three would do the job because it's apparently steel reinforced UHPC under granite, and I highly doubt the US would risk the political fallout from dropping a B-61 Mod 13 on it.

>>63857315
>Whole ass.
Shut the fuck up zoomer, you are not welcome here.

>>63862493
I decided to nukemap this out of curiosity and while the crater itself does not go as deep as the facility I don't think it would survive the seismic shockwaves of having a nuke detonate 6m below ground. At the very least the centrifuges will probably destroy themselves due to the ensuing disruption.

>>63862679
>I don't think it would survive the seismic shockwaves of having a nuke detonate
Then they don't even need a nuke. They just need a really strong conventional warhead able to direct its force at the tunnels. We can also assume third-world levels of construction, here, so that'll work in their favor.

>>63862493
>The IDF is aware of reports regarding a number of injured individuals from IDF fire following the crowd’s approach. The details of the incident are under review
"Aware of reports" is not admitting that they fired, it's acknowledging that such accusations exist. This is the exact same wording they used when they were accused of bombing that hospital that Hamas rocketed.