Thread 63860052

Singapore does not have any protection against ICBMs. Thoughts?

Singapore only has iron dome radars and aster missiles, they are vulnerable to complete and utter devastation to missile spam. Yet all they did was buy more submarines and f-35

Neither does China.

>>63860069
They do though.

>>63860052 (OP)
No country on the planet has a reliable ICBM defense.

>>63860052 (OP)
Singapore MUST develop a nuclear arsenal for deterrence.

>>63860336
except they dont

>>63860415
This. Singapore in its current state cannot survive an attack from either it's immediate neighbors, let alone China. They need to rapidly develop nuclear capabilities and ICBMs to be able to bring Beijing to its knees with strategic nukes.

>>63860661
Singapore needs to have nuclear submarines capable of launching nuclear warheads. They have the money for it. They aren't doing enough for deterrence.

who the fuck would blow Singapore up?

They have that IRON in them
I think they'll be fine

>>63860671
Me.

When ICBM's start dropping, no protection will protect you, for it will be the end of the world as you know it.

deterrence is the best form of defense as per Chinese tradition.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWNeMH2w4rA

I don't give a fuck about Singapore but the OP pic goes hard.

>>63860052 (OP)
Well, guess need to go shop for one. Amazon or Temu have those?

>>63860671
The motto of every national security bureau should be this. "Always expect trouble and if failing that, create trouble for someone else". Singapore needs 500 nuclear warheads in the 1-5 MT range with ICBMs capable of hitting Moscow/Beijing/Washington/Paris/London/New Delhi etc

>>63860869
The vast majority of Americans and Australians on /k/, hate Singapore

How does a country like Singapore defend itself without diplomacy?

>>63860052 (OP)
neither does chile

>>63863893
no one cares about SEAmonkey shitflinging except their fellow seamonkey neighbors. And it only gets worse as more thirdies get online

>>63860052 (OP)
Singapore is only vulnerable to China, as attacking it is like attacking Vancouver BC. A declaration of war against the PRC.

>>63860052 (OP)
Singapore's protected from ICBMs by not being a suitabe target for such chip-factory-ruining weapons.

>>63863893
>The vast majority of Americans and Australians on /k/, hate Singapore
We don't even think about you at all

>>63860742
That's not very nice of you, anon

>>63866408
It’s not nice but it is well within his God given rights to do so, personally I’m tossing up between nuking Jakarta or Point Nemo

Attack on a Sunday. It's the day off for most maids there.

>>63866718
Maids don't have a day off in Singapore are you daft? Their maids are caretakers of children. You don't just take a day off. What? The diaper going to change themselves on a Sunday?