← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 63864798

59 posts 44 images /k/
Anonymous No.63864798 >>63864848 >>63864905 >>63867161 >>63871135
is the f-47 gonna use some shit like this?
Anonymous No.63864832
yeah
Anonymous No.63864842 >>63864849 >>63864875 >>63865397 >>63867161
>Boeing
Rip test pilots
Anonymous No.63864848 >>63867602
>>63864798 (OP)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adaptive_compliant_wing

It will use something even better, it may even lack 'distinct' elevons. Without sharp edges, it will be even more stealthy, not to mention the tech for such a design has been in testing and development forever. It is about time it is used.

If not it will no doubt have some sort of exotic jammer to reduce signatures, either that or yet another improved generation of RCS reducing coatings...
Anonymous No.63864849 >>63864856 >>63867018
>>63864842
>being scared of a nosedive
just say you're a bottom and move on
Anonymous No.63864856 >>63864873 >>63868363
>>63864849
WE GAAN!
Anonymous No.63864873
>>63864856
He was justified. The ATC should have given him the due respect he deserved, and the other plane should've know to get out of his way.
Anonymous No.63864875 >>63867024 >>63870118 >>63870758
>>63864842
you do know Boeing neglected their civil aircraft side of the company because of their renewed focus on getting military contracts right? the McDonnell Douglas merger people used their money to buy a majority of shares and then go back to doing what McDonnell Douglas did
Anonymous No.63864905 >>63867033 >>63871374
>>63864798 (OP)
Anon you gotta understand that the F-47 doesn't actually exist.
The program lumbered along for years, they build some tech demonstrators maybe, but they haven't actually build a prototype or even finalized a design.
Even if they had, you can bet your ass the trump admin threw the existing plans out the window and now they're scrambling to design a new plane that can actually go up against china.

This is more than obvious, they only showed a vague render when they talked about F-47 and all other shit that was in procurement got the axe, including F-35, fucking awacs (E-2 lmao) etc.
Not saying it's not happening but at this point nobody, not even Boeing knows what the F-47 looks like. They're back to concept stage.

NO I got FUCKALL proof for these OUTRAGEOUS claims but this ain't my first rodeo observing procurement programs. This is the phase we're in, concept phase.
Bit unusual to have it twice on the same plane but it happens.
Anonymous No.63864954
bring back articulating wings
Anonymous No.63865397 >>63867030 >>63870123 >>63870267
>>63864842
the enjeetneers
Anonymous No.63867018
>>63864849
more like boeing forces you into a nosedive
Anonymous No.63867024
>>63864875
>you do know Boeing neglected their civil aircraft side of the company because of their renewed focus on getting military contracts right?
Sure, it's going so well for the military side of Boeing that they even fucked up a trainer lmao
Anonymous No.63867030 >>63867161 >>63870318
>>63865397
I'm assuming H1B jeets are what caused Boeings ills.
Anonymous No.63867033 >>63867076
>>63864905
The funny thing is that the yuros at least show their CGI renders in full, while the F-47 always has shadows, condensation cones etc because they haven't even got to the part where they settled down on a general design.
>muh secrecy
Naw friend, with these things if they really had something they would show a different design to lead other countries on a wild goose chase like they already did with the Boeing reentry vehicle or the chinks did prior to showing the 2 prototypes flying.
TACO saying theirs is the "first flying 6th gen" is pure unalterated copium.
>ib4 more copium
Anonymous No.63867076 >>63867107 >>63868056
>>63867033
You do realize the taco shit is a dead giveaway you're a redditor, right?
Anonymous No.63867107 >>63867125 >>63867168
>>63867076
never been there, been here since 2008. /k/ has been shit since the generals started in late 2013. You're a roody poo candy ass without any counter arguments so you have to resort to muh plebbit. Go back to 9gag.
Anonymous No.63867125 >>63867372 >>63868393 >>63871397
>>63867107
>the "i'm totally an oldfag" bit
post guns, redditor
Anonymous No.63867161 >>63867392 >>63867919
>>63864798 (OP)
Probably. And most likely fluidity TVC from Boeings ICE, FATE, X-36, and X-45 studies and programs.
>>63864842
Only turdies.had problems because low IQ and untrainable.
>>63867030
Jeets can't get clearances for the defense side.
Anonymous No.63867168 >>63867372
>>63867107
YWNBAW; you will always be a fsggot in a dress giving you boyfriend rug burn on his dick from your 5 o'clock stubble blow jobs.
Anonymous No.63867372 >>63867382
>>63867125
now you.
>>63867168
>self projection out of nowhere
lmao, don't project your repressed desires onto me.
Anonymous No.63867382 >>63867412 >>63867550 >>63868393
>>63867372
Not a timestamp, mentally ill troon. Post gay-r in same chair with an actual timestamp.
Anonymous No.63867392
>>63867161
>Jeets can't get clearances for the defense side.
The best part about working in defense was the complete lack of jeets. Its really the only part of working in a SCIF that I miss.
Anonymous No.63867412
>>63867382
Post gun, trannitor.
Anonymous No.63867550 >>63867611
>>63867382
So... When are posting your guns?
Anonymous No.63867602 >>63867607 >>63867665 >>63867919 >>63870153
>>63864848
This, piezoelectric actuators that produce small bubbles/bumps on the control surfaces to disrupt airflow like flap/slat spoilers do; jet or forced air slots and holes, Continuous Moldline Technology (CMT) similar to what you posted; and fluidic TVC are all possible technologies that are within the realm of reality as to what type of control surface technologies that could be matured enough to be on the NGAD (Air Force F-X) and the NGAD (Navy F/A-XX).

They've been working on these technologies since the early-mid 90s, and some are at a Tech Readiness (TR) level that they're able to be reliable, cheap-ish, and easy enough to mass produce manufacturing wise.

China even stole the CMT tech from NASA/Boeing for the J-36 and J-50, and copied their designs from a mid 90s study done by McDonnell Douglas (Boeing) for NASA.

If you're wondering where China got the design for the J-36 from, look no further than a 1994 NASA study done by McDonnell Douglas.
https://web.archive.org/web/20100520190158/http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19950005539_1995105539.pdf

Same with their J-50, though, they added the all-moving tips from the NASA/USAF Innovative Control Effectors (ICE) study done by Lockheed Martin.

China stole the Continuous Moldline Technology (CMT) tech NASA developed for the Fighter Lift and Control (FLAC)/Subsonic High Alpha Research Concept (SHARC) and slapped it on the drag rudders claiming they invented it, it's revolutionary, and not for NASA in the late 1990s. KEK
Even the Chinsects know they stole it: https://www.zhangqiaokeyan.com/ntis-science-report_nasa_thesis/02071203239.html
Boeing patent (patented in China, too, by Boeing): https://patents.google.com/patent/US8814100B2/en
Page 37: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/tr/pdf/ADA415970.pdf
https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999SPIE.3674..391P/abstract
https://www.secretprojects.co.uk/threads/nasa-ames-usaf-wright-laboratory-flac-sharc.373/
Anonymous No.63867607 >>63867891
>>63867602
is that thing fucking bending?
Anonymous No.63867611 >>63867638 >>63867911 >>63868393
>>63867550
That's not the gay-r. And what American writes the date, as DD/MM/YYYY? Why does the grip look like it has literal shit on it?
Anonymous No.63867638 >>63867898 >>63867911
>>63867611
I'm not taking the M16 out of the safe just to please a noguns online, you'll have to make do with the glock. Also, who said I'm american? and the grip has baked in grime since it's the same handgun I daily carry and compete in amateur dynamical shooting competitions with since 2013.
I still see you are not posting any guns. Why?
Anonymous No.63867665
>>63867602
saucy
Anonymous No.63867891
>>63867607
Yeah, it's called camber morphing. This on particularly is called the FlexFoil Adaptive Compliant Trailing Edge (ACTE). They tried it on the F-111 Mission Adaptive Wing (MAW). You can also just twist the whole wing slightly, like they did on the Active Aeroelastic Wing (AAW) X-53 F/18 Hornet.

Decent paper on various morphing technologies and techniques:
https://journal.hep.com.cn/fme/CN/10.1007/s11465-023-0750-6

F-111 MAW:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tm2YdbbLhYY
F-18 AAW:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o5TI8e90HQo
FlexFoil ACTE:
https://www.flxsys.com/flexfoil
https://www.mobilityengineeringtech.com/component/content/article/41362-sae-ma-00510
Anonymous No.63867898 >>63867909 >>63867932 >>63868393
>>63867638
>I'm not taking the M16 out of the safe just to please a noguns online
Because it's not yours, or else you would've already posted a timestamp pic of it. Now, post a timestamp pic of your plastic nigger pistol in that chair. lying troon.
Anonymous No.63867909 >>63867928
>>63867898
>crying shitting and begging others to post guns
>can't post guns
no one takes you seriously
Anonymous No.63867911 >>63867928
>>63867611
settle down bro, he clowned you >>63867638
As a fellow American I can say these two truths a real man knows when to graciously bow out, and DD/MM/YYYY is superior (unless you're manually timestamping things, in which case YYYY.MM.DD HH:MM:SS is best, for obvious reasons)
Anonymous No.63867919 >>63867952
>>63867602
>>63867161
>Probably. And most likely fluidity TVC from Boeings ICE, FATE, X-36, and X-45 studies and programs.


Then there was Boeing Tailless Advanced Fighter Aircraft (TAFA) that proceeded ICE, Future Aircraft Technology Enhancements (FATE), Northrop Grumman Supersonic Tailless Air Vehicle (STAV), Lockheed Martin Efficient Supersonic Air Vehicle Exploration (ESAV) part of US Air Force Research Laboratories (AFRL) EXPanded MDO for Effectiveness based DesIgn TEchnologies EXPEDITE, and some more I'm surely forgetting.

>ICE:
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADB212813.pdf
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADB232172.pdf
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADB212361.pdf

>TAFA:
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA386872.pdf

>FATE:
Boeing's FATE:
https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/ac/docs/bfrptpa4/sld001.htm
Lockheed Martin's FATE:
https://man.fas.org/dod-101/sys/ac/docs/fatereport/sld001.htm

>NG STAV:
https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA482575.pdf
Anonymous No.63867928 >>63867932 >>63867938 >>63867943 >>63867974 >>63868393 >>63869209
>>63867909
>>63867911
Stop samefagging and just post the fucking plastic nigger pistol in that chair, you lying dick sucking 50 year old balding, greasy, obese manchild failure in a wig and your sister's clothes.
Anonymous No.63867932 >>63868144
>>63867928
>>63867898
>Now, post a timestamp pic of your plastic nigger pistol in that chair. lying troon.
Here you go, now you can run away like the little rat you are, because you don't own any guns.
Anonymous No.63867938
>>63867928
Also, since you clearly like my A1 have a better pic I took with the nikon.
Anonymous No.63867943 >>63867958
>>63867928
To add, it looks like you clearly have an history of mental illness. Hadrian really fucked your people up.
Anonymous No.63867952
>>63867919
Boeing X-53 Active Aeroelastic Wing demonstrator.
Anonymous No.63867958 >>63867965
>>63867943
Jesus Christ he's an actual schizo. BTW I checked all those threads, he never once posted a single picture of a timestamped firearm, he simply runs away when somebody posts theirs.
Anonymous No.63867965
>>63867958
>he never once posted a single picture of a timestamped firearm
Not true, he posted a picture he had saved from /k/ and posted 7 year prior of another anon's firearms LMAO.
Anonymous No.63867974
>>63867928
>you lying dick sucking 50 year old balding, greasy, obese manchild failure in a wig and your sister's clothes.
Even more projections. So, why do you want to wear your sister clothes?
Anonymous No.63868056
>>63867076
You do realise that tacos are food, and you mentioning reddit every 5 minutes makes you the redditor, right?
Anonymous No.63868144
>>63867932
You fucking destroyed him
Anonymous No.63868363 >>63868728
>>63864856
Anonymous No.63868393
>>63867928
>>63867898
>>63867611
>>63867382
>>63867125
noguns brownoid
Anonymous No.63868728
>>63868363
I don't get the meme. Sure the photo is funny in the context, but it's my understanding the fault lies squarely with the ATC
Anonymous No.63869209
>>63867928
We are all still waitimg for your guns.
Anonymous No.63870118
>>63864875
That's not how business units work
Anonymous No.63870123 >>63870243
>>63865397
I wonder if a software bug caused that recent air india 787 to crash, i wouldn't be surprised desu
Anonymous No.63870153
>>63867602
>stole
>publicly available research papers 4chan permavirgins can access
Yeah ok bud
Anonymous No.63870243
>>63870123
Hardware also bugged (jeet pilot).
Anonymous No.63870267
>>63865397
Anonymous No.63870318
>>63867030
Boeing's civil aviation business has been dying a slow, painful death ever since they bought McDonnell Douglas, then decided that the guys who ran that company into the ground not only got to work in Boeing's c suite, but revive their idiotic pet project that had failed to save McD in the first place.
Anonymous No.63870758
>>63864875
you satisfy the carnal needs of homosexual men for personal gratification
Anonymous No.63871135
>>63864798 (OP)
Perhaps
Anonymous No.63871374
>>63864905
pls learn the difference between build and built tyvm
Anonymous No.63871397
>>63867125
constantly appealing to reddit is completely insufferable and retarded, regardless of whether you the fag or the anon you're annoying with your retarded baseless claims has been on this shithole site for X or Y amount of years
stupid nigger