>Slavshit infantry gear
EXPOSED
>Slavshit infantry equipment
EXPOSED
>AK pattern rifles
EXPOSED
>Slavshit handguns
EXPOSED
>Slavshit AT weapons
EXPOSED (but somewhat useful as a drone warhead)
>Slavshit air defense
EXPOSED^4 (Syria, Iraq, Iran, Ukraine)
>S400
EXPOSED
>Slavshit IFVs and AFVs
EXPOSED
>T-series tanks
EXPOSED
>Slavshit ships
EXPOSED AND SUNK
>Slavshit planes
EXPOSED AND SHOT DOWN BY FRIENDLIES
>Slavshit EW and jammers
EXPOSED

Why do you still rate slavshit gear and weaponry? Why do you still defend slavshit on /k/ and cream your pants over it? Why do you believe their lies even though indeniable evidence exists of slavshit inferiority? What's wrong with you? Are you a masochist? Do you have a humiliation fetish?

>Ziggers equipment is shit o algo

>>63894108
Yes.

Monkey model users

>>63894069 (OP)
I agree with you on everything else, but AK pattern rifles haven't been exposed as bad. The Ukrainians use them pretty well. And besides, in modern peer warfare what the infantryman rifle is just isn't that important. If they carried their grandfather's M1 Garands they would only be marginally less effective combatwise, that's the truth /k/ refuses to acknowledge.

>>63894150
Kinda, somewhat agree on the infantryman point, but AK pattern is completely exposed for personal use unless it's a Finnish or Israeli derivative. They're jammy, inaccurate pieces of shit with poor manufacturing quality and fire a round that has poor ballistics.

>>63894069 (OP)
>"slavshit inferiority"

>>63894150
>The Ukrainians use them pretty well
They prefer to use literally anything else if given the option.

>>63894069 (OP)
https://youtu.be/6DrkdbvBYc0
Video related, long promised Bradley vs БMП-3 first test of the series by Ukraine's most popular youtuber.

>>63894187
Oh, it's that subhuman fag again who couldn't even handle an AT-4 correctly.

>>63894208
>AT-4
the famous swedish "recoilless" weapon that blows your eye out

>>63894218
maybe try holding it correctly you weak subhuman

>>63894187
>Ukraine's most popular youtuber.
why do you faggots always have to do this?
is this because you know that no one is interested in some retarded rusnigger propaganda?

>>63894187
feels kinda surreal, like us govt supplied apc that's being used in actual running war and now used to make videos and shill products by some youtuber.
Panem et circenses.
>>63894226
lol yeah "by the handle" kek
It's just a piece of shit, ain't much else to it.
If I end up in trenches I sure ain't touching that thing.

>>63894231
>why do you faggots always have to do this?
It's in their so-called "metodischka", the methods. Propaganda farm's overseer gives them the methods, they get paid to post it.

>>63894150
Yeah, it's less "AK PATTERNS EXPOSED" and more "AK-12 EXPOSED"

>>63894246
>If I end up in trenches I sure ain't touching that thing.
yeah, you'll just get the infinitely shittier, much nore unreliable and much more kickier RPG-7, you weak subhuman

>>63894231
>>63894256
and when you do, please fire the RPG like this for maximum power.

>>63894256
nah, I'm in globohomo occupied area so no RPG-7 for me just the recoilless at4 "black eye"

>>63894248
>"metodischka", the methods
it's slang for a "methodical recommendations" handbook

>>63894286
I see, cool. Thanks for the correction. Was that some kind of KGB shilling handbook?

>>63894277
>he shills for slavshit
>on 4chan
>for free

>>63894277
So what's wrong with you? Are you a humiliation fetishist? A retard? A masochist? Or all three?

>>63894291
Originally that's what pretty much any "how to do shit handbook" was called in USSR and post-USSR. So could be handbook for university students (of staff for that matter), could be for bureaucrats, could be for "political commissars" (basically special propaganda officers in the army), could be for pretty much anyone, basically he's a short form condensed knowledge on how to do shit which you'll need in your work. So the term was neutral initially.
However, the same shit was then used for propagandists in russia, so the term got more and more colored as time went by. Initially TV and "old media" faggots had propaganda handbook prepared for them every week about how to cover specific topics, what to ignore, what to specifically highlight, what to paint in good light and how, which talking points to use and so on and so forth. Then after 2008 internet and external propaganda in russia rapidly became an important point (after 2008 war in Georgia), for international shit RT was actively built out, for internet other crap was done, but internet was very wide, old methods didn't work, so in grew in many ways and paid commentator outfits became a norm and those retards that were working on them had to be trained and tuned correctly and constantly, so they also started doing special reports/handbooks on how and what should be pushed online. Some of those metodichkas were very easy to notice, since the talking points appeared rapidly from out of nowhere and were very uniform and not organic. Later that evolved. But yeah, some of those metodichkas even got leaked a couple times. So for savvy internet user in russia (and close by) the term got so colored that it's hard to view it as anything other than "propaganda manual".

>>63894150
nah the step between a battle rifle and an assault gun is pretty steep once you reach sub 300m range.
All of those close engagement videos show dudes spraying bullets at each other and the one who has to reload first gets munched.

>>63894218
that dude literally cried after driving around an leo 2 when its cuts to him in a hangar where he talks his usual bullshit about Nato equipment

>>63894323
>an assault gun

>>63894277
True we need to use glorious puccian rpg instead, vid related

>>63894150
Ure right, lets just give them Mosins and save some money

>>63894339
>weak arms
found your problem again

>>63894321
Thanks man, interesting stuff

>>63894208
To be fair, he explicitly stated that he is holding it incorrectly at that time. So he knew that what he did was stupid and wrong... and he did it nonetheless for... reasons.
Yeah I know it's not really a defense but he knowingly acted stupid

>>63894069 (OP)
Apologize right now!

>>63894691
>So he knew that what he did was stupid and wrong... and he did it nonetheless for... reasons.
Just Ruskie things

>>63894691
Truth is it's just piece of shit design that gouges your eyes out.

>>63894873
It's interesting how during all of these years that AT-4 has been in use in Western militaries, this so-called eye gouger has in fact not gouged any eyes. Then some slavshit subhuman fires it intentionally wrong for propaganda and fucks it up. Then another subhuman, (You), lie and claim that it was in fact the weapon itself that is a dangerous piece of shit.

>>63894208
That reminds me

>>63894917
Probably already happened countless times tho what can you do, write strongly worded letter to globohomo military industrial complex?

>>63894961
"Recoilless" there is just a brand name kek.

>>63894969
see >>63894961

Interesting how the globohomo military golems can fire the simple weapon correctly without blowing their eyes out. Why do you continue lying even when you're completely exposed and BTFO? What's wrong with you? Are you a humiliation fetishist? A retard? A masochist? Or all three?

>>63894980
0.1% of the full recoil is recoilless.
Unlike "zero/light food/beverages" that reduces the calories by 20-60%

>>63894917
The AT4 is a Swedish weapon.
No one hates the russians more than Swedes do.

The Swedes were clever enough to install hidden circuitry into every single AT4, this advanced circuitry can detect when a russian is trying to fire the weapon, in which case the AT4 will deliberately malfunction to maim or kill the russian.

>>63895008
It's not the "never trust the russians" but "never trust the danes" anon

>>63895008
Takata airbag of the rocket launchers

>>63895020
Well, obviously the Danes are enemy no1. That goes without saying.
But the russians are pretty close, clearly no2.

>>63894162
You don't own any or bought garbage rods.

>>63894069 (OP)
>>Slavshit EW and jammers
>EXPOSED
But that's one of the very few things that's working better than expected.

But Ukraine also uses slavshit weapons?

>>63895096
Jamming GPS signals is actually pretty easy because of how weak the satellite emissions are by the time they get to Earth. This is why M-code and GPS Block III has been slowly rolled out over the last 10 years or so

>>63895098
Yes, and? They if anyone know how shit it is compared to the western kit they also have.

>>63895098
Yes, and they fully acknowledge that slavshit is trash, and they're basically only using it because they're poor and trying to make the best of what they've got.
The Ukrainians aren't claiming to be the second most powerful military in the world.

but slavshit has cool aesthetics and that's all that matters

>>63895115
It looks like it was designed to be cannon fodder and rusting in piles for salvage.

So sure.

>>63895115
this is like the only actual argument that slavshit lovers have

>>63894069 (OP)
>Why do you still rate slavshit gear and weaponry?
Because it's never been about preformance, I also like 70s muscle cars that would lose any track race to a new toyota corolla.

>>63894961
Globohomo nazi zog ubermensch > trad russian soldier of christ

>>63895033
Kom an, din svenske hund! Det stockholmske blodbad bliver snart gentaget!

>>63894069 (OP)
>>AK pattern rifles
>EXPOSED
I must have missed out on this one. QRD?

>>63895330
>I must have missed out on this one. QRD?
They're just simply shit, unless it's a specific Western modification to make it not shit. Poor ballistics, rusts easily, jams easily, poor ergonomics, inaccurate, hilariously bad iron sights. They're literally designed to be used by malnourished farmers who will die in the first meatwave. They're garbage.

>>63894069 (OP)
you forgot
>Slavshit not being gay
EXPOSED

>>63895315
Vänta bara! Nästa gång det blir tillräckligt kallt marscherar vi över Bält och krossar danmark igen!

actually slavshit AD is exposed to the sixth power
>Yugoslavia
>Gulf War
>Iraq War
>Syria
>Ukraine
>Iran
Everywhere slavshit AD goes, they get absolutely dunked on
EXPOSED^6

>>63895375
technically russian AD worked against russian planes in ukiraine, so...

>>63894980
Tourist go home

>>63895375
Same for the T-series, people like to forget the Gulf War but pretty new T-72s got fucked to death.

>>63895383
>Thanos.png
>I used the slavshit to destroy the slavshit

>>63895375
B-but the Serbs shot down a plane! A fancy plane!

>>63895403
all slavshit is good for is getting destroyed
at least getting destroyed by other slavshit makes it a contest

>>63894218
oh, you mean this?

COUNTERPOINT

>Slavshit acting as targets for better weapons
UNEXPOSABLE
>Slavshit as the bad guy gear in film and vidya
UNEXPOSABLE

>>63894162
Dirst rifle I ever shot was AK74 and i managed to hit 10 times torso target 280 meters away using irons. It was a conscript AK too. Than I got cocky and started to miss.

>>63894253
B-But muh AK-12M1!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l0VDS1G6GEI

>>63894150
>AK pattern rifles haven't been exposed as bad.

The Russians shat on the ak-12 for a hot minute and their special forces still choose the AK-74M over it.

>>63896165
>Yes, AK-12 is a bad gun

>>63895436
Jesus fucking Christ it is literally written WITH DIAGRAMS on the side of the thing how to hold it. How do you even just ignore the foregrip like that?

>>63897911
>How do you even just ignore the foregrip like that?
Because he intentionally shot it like that for propaganda, to demonstrate NATO tranny ZOG inferiority.

>>63897917
>we didn't fuck up, it was a deliberate thing

>>63897911
>>63897917
>our mighty bear warriors fall over like little girls when they try to fire weak nato weapons
interesting party line lol

>>63894150
Ukrainians are switching to Bren 2 and domestically produced AR-15s (UAR-15).

soviet shit is good, anything after the 90s is bad

>>63894069 (OP)
>Slavs in general
EXPOSED.

There's is a much maligned Austrian gentleman who is owed a collective apology.

>>63898332
tell me about it lmfao

>>63894339
>welcome to jackass

>>63899191
Soviet shit is still shit. Anything past the 90s is dogshit.

>>63894069 (OP)
>Slavshit
>:(

>Slavshit but Ukraine
:)

>>63894069 (OP)
Slavshit enjoyer here. We know it's shit, we don't care

>>63900624
correct, because along with the vietnamese they're one of the few competent parties to make use of slavshit.
they know it's inferior too, btw, they're just making do with what they have.

>>63894162
Noguns retard.

>>63894253
>"AK-12 EXPOSED"
>downgrade from ak-74 and 47 to ak-12
Don't know what they were expecting...

>>63895224
the real actual argument is the same one that caused slavshit to exist in the first place: that its cheap.

>>63900648
>>63900624
>>63895115
>>63901194
It is worth noting that every moderately successful non-soviet nation that used their weapons eventually altered their designs or used them in unintended ways. Current Chinese and DPRK designs are their own species compared to their inspiration or core technologies. Those adaptations are often much better than what the USSR imagined.

>Pic related showing up as a DDR or NKVD 'security vehicle' in the early 1980s would have been the cat's ass.

>>63901228
Huh.

Just realized something: It is difficult to use the firing ports next to the turret if it is transporting troops. It can carry 5-6, they would get in the way of the crew if they were not offloaded before combat. They would get in the way of the turret doing a full rotation.

>>63901228
>>Pic related showing up as a DDR or NKVD 'security vehicle' in the early 1980s would have been the cat's ass.
Bet this shit can be disabled by a lateral spray and pray of armor piercing 556.

>>63894069 (OP)
All their planning was predicated on First Strike(s) and rolling quantity over glassed to fuck quality. The faster they zerg rush Gibralter before reinforcements from Uncle Sam, the better. It's the rationale for dogshit corrupted conventional forces in the continuation state to this day.

>>63894218
>written boldly and brightly in white on the green AT-4 with pictures shown how to operate it
>russoid still decides to not hold the handle and gets a black eye because of it
kek

>>63894069 (OP)
I mean it was always in the name? Who is surprised that SLAVSHIT is anything but a big turd?

>>63894069 (OP)
>Slavshit IFVs and AFVs
>T-series tanks
Alright, I'll take the bait.
The current war isn't clear evidence the AFVs used by Russia/Ukraine are shit. I don't think we've seen an actual combined arms assault. Its mostly just sending 2 tanks or IFVs towards the front and hoping for the best. If anything, this war is evidence that Russian/Ukrainian training and doctrine (If they even have one let alone adhering to it) are awful. I will give a pass to some instances as drones are a new and developing aspect of modern warfare.

>>63903144
>The current war isn't clear evidence the AFVs used by Russia/Ukraine are shit.
Clear and overwhelmingly evidence with none to the contrary, maybe not, but this war does offer evidence towards that conclusion.
T-series tanks have been proven to be consistently vulnerable to most Soviet and Western anti-tank systems. The fact that crew survival is unlikely in case of vehicle destruction is a huge black mark.
Russian AFVs (and MT-LBs) have demonstrated their severely lacking survivability characteristics.
More than anything, this war is putting the Soviet maxim of "Quantity has a quality of its own" to the test. It remains to be seen if it fails, but it sure as shit ain't getting an A+.

AKs still gucci, rite?

ukraine hasn't really done any better or worse with soviet or nato gear

s-300s were doing just as well as patriots
afvs have been comparable
mig-29s/su-27s have been comparable to f-16s

they lacked long range strike options like himars, but tornado is equivalent and iskander is better than atacms.

>>63894069 (OP)
Just call it soviet

>>63903321
they weren't given a strike bird, and su-24s have done well with cruise missiles

they used tochka-u to similar effect as atacms

they took out moskva with soviet missiles (switchblade copies)

>>63903299
>T-series tanks have been proven to be consistently vulnerable to most Soviet and Western anti-tank systems.
It would be interesting to see if theres stats on where most of the T-Tanks have been hit by AT. I wouldn't be surprised if it indicates a lack of situational awareness.
It'll be interesting to see how the Russians develop their autloaders going forward. It'll likely just be tacking ADS on to everything though.
>More than anything, this war is putting the Soviet maxim of "Quantity has a quality of its own" to the test. It remains to be seen if it fails, but it sure as shit ain't getting an A+.
Thats whats making me think its poor adherence to doctrine or lack thereof. Surely someone realises that Quantity isn't the way to go anymore, they probably got axed for trying to increase costs lol.

>>63903321
>>63903339
Perhaps practical training from the UA side has given them the edge compared to whatever the Russians do whilst training. I'd imagine Russian high command has some more *personal incentives* to cut down on ordnance used on ex.

>>63903356
>Surely someone realises that Quantity isn't the way to go anymore, they probably got axed for trying to increase costs lol.
Something in this vein happened with the Soviet/Russian T-80 program.

>>63903388
They were so close to greatness with reverse gears and a GT engine.