>the state of the brits

>>63912210 (OP)
The Raj wasn't built in a day; it won't be reclaimed in a day.

>>63912210 (OP)

>>63912210 (OP)
Sad girls in snow?

>>63912215

>>63912210 (OP)

>>63912235

>>63912213
how does leaving your f35 there equal to reclaiming it?

>>63912246
>how does leaving your f35 there equal to reclaiming it?
Saar…

i reiterate as i will continue to do in these threads
humiliation ritual

what a sad state britain is at
cant even recover one of their planes

>>63912210 (OP)
Thank the heavens we never let them have any of our actual good technology.

>>63912210 (OP)
>Day 15, the locals seem friendly. Food is spicy. I'm starting to learn the language. Can bob my head now.

can't they just initiate autonomous mode and make it fly back home?

>>63912210 (OP)
It belongs to Bharatistan now! #India2020 #FuckPak

>>63912359
Shh that feature totally doesn't exist.

>>63912377
>that Mahindra armoured car
An F-35, in a country struggling to put together something that just looks like a 5th gen of their own........will the English ever get it back?

>Russians and jeets thread
Dropped

>>63912493
>Russians and jeets
The London property market. Little wonder they get to detain our cool toy

I feel like we need to blow that thing up before it ends up in China. The fuck is India gonna do, shit in our streets?

>>63912609
>before it ends up in China
India and China are rivals.

>>63912256
It's an American built and maintained aircraft though.

>>63912493
Clearly.
This airbase has been considered a safe landing spot by brits for the last 90 years, its had all sorts of fun aircraft land on it.

>>63912256
>>63912804
It's pretty insane when you realize that the UK's nukes literally depend on American missiles to be delivered.

How much of a pathetic power do you have to be to allow your nukes to depend on other countries to be launched?
Even turboshitholes like India and Pakistan developed their own delivery systems.

>>63912886
UK is an American proxy, always has been since WW2

>>63912886
>It's pretty insane when you realize that the UK's nukes literally depend on American missiles to be delivered
Gets worse when you realize that it fails every time they test them. Either they are incompetent, or Lockheed sold them a lemon. Neither bodes well.

>>63912886
>It's pretty insane when you realize that the UK's nukes literally depend on American missiles to be delivered.
This isn't the flex you think it is

>>63912886
Blame the Labour and Conservative parties. Sometime after the Suez crisis, both Labour and the Tories agreed to turn Britain into an American vassal.

>>63912210 (OP)
No amount of water will make it clean again.

>>63913115
>Sometime after the Suez crisis, both Labour and the Tories agreed to turn Britain into an American vassal
It seems to be working out for them. London is still basically the financial centre of the world.

If this Anglo thing is ticking along, seems silly to rock the boat by restarting some intra-Anglo feuds. What are they going to do, send Kiwis to do Hakas opposite the Wall St Bull?

>>63913225
> It seems to be working out for them
You mean its working out for London, Thatcher let the rest of the UK’s industries rot in exchange making London more attractive for money laundering.
> If this Anglo thing is ticking along,
But it isn’t, Britain is a vassal of America, and America is a vassal of Israel. Atlanticism was a mistake, Britain should deepen its economic ties with the rest of Europe.

>>63913225
>London is still basically the financial centre of the Russian Oligarchs

FTFY.

UK is a shitty rainy island who decided to destroyed their industry to appease foreign elites and now it's desperately trying to cope that they're still a world power despite having a smaller navy than France.

>>63913225
They'll send the paki rape gangs to Vermont and NH.

>>63913225
>London is still basically the financial centre of the world.
Very little of the wealth trickles down.

>>63912961
>fails every time they test them
No retard. It failed twice in a row in 2023 or 2024 idr, sure but they never talk about the successful tests. They test them quite frequently.
>>63913253
>Smaller navy than 1 small carrier France
Yeah OK retard. Both the French and Bongs are aligned geopolitical too.
Ibdssignate you as a DnC shill.

>>63916394
>implying it was different back in the good old days

>>63916413
Your cope is that it's cool because they used to have feudalism?
UK wages are shocking. Jobs that would get you over 150k USD PA in the USA pay about 50k GBP PA in the UK with far worse taxes. All that wealth is going somewhere and it's not in the pockets of the people. No wonder why so many of their best educated flee for greener pastures.

>>63912886
>Even turboshitholes like India and Pakistan developed their own delivery systems.
That's why they dont fucking work retard

>>63916437
Could you keep it on your containment boards /pol/ and /biz/ and not push this shift via your threads on /k/ thanks.

>>63916412
>They test them quite frequently.
No they don't. The last successful test was in 2005. 20 years ago.

>>63913225
>London is still basically the financial centre of the world.
More like the tax dodger centre of the world lmao.

>>63916596
it isn't even the financial center of Europe anymore

>>63912246
wherever British planes land, there is Britain also

>>63916394
>Very little of the wealth trickles down.
I would never believe it would but it's there "in the economy", even if it's not really circulating so much.
That's good enough for the people making decisions like
>is it a good idea to allow the vassalisation process to continue knowing that we'll be part of the new financial elite that emerges?
or
>should we break away from USA and try to unify with continental Europe to replace the set bonuses we used to get from Empire?

Keep in mind that aside from being a small fish in a big pond in continental Europe, they'd just fought the second of two recent existential wars with the unruly chaps and they didn't seem to be quite ready for a unified trading economy.

>>63916470
struck a nerve huh

>>63916632
Objectively incorrect.

At least we're getting some good memes out of this

https://files.catbox.moe/on20o8.mp4

>>63916437
Exactly, and this F-35 as well.

>>63913633
So just to be clear, there is literal gangs of pakis dismembering and raping children in the UK and the govt just covers it

Shit like that would trgger a world war in the 20th century. Tiananmen Square was triggered by African students assaulting women, Yugoslavia broke up over this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%90or%C4%91e_Martinovi%C4%87_incident

And youre telling me they just go around with Pakistani grooming gangs in the UK? That's wild

>>63913225
>London is still basically the financial centre of the world.
Market cap:
>London: $4 trillion
>NYC (NYSE + NASDAQ): $50+ trillion
Daily trading volume looks even worse.

>>63920635
They cover it up so hard they had 9 separate inquiries into it since 2001 and it's been current in the news for nearly 20 years. And the inquiries were not cover jobs, I've read them, they're pretty damning to the local council and most of them include recommendations about how to go forward to prevent it happening again.
The paki rape gangs exist and the original council tried to cover it up at a local level, but since then it's all been pretty out in the open. Everything else is pretty much propaganda from turdies and Russians looking to cause shit.

>Shit like that would trgger a world war in the 20th century. Tiananmen Square was triggered by African students assaulting women, Yugoslavia broke up over this
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C4%90or%C4%91e_Martinovi%C4%87_incident
No, these may have been (arguably) triggering incidents, but they weren't caused by it, there existed wide sstemic fissures and issues in those two places that presumably do not, despite the Kremlin's best efforts, exist in the UK.

>>63920683
No... Stop being reasonable, we have a narrative to push!
They should still deport all of them, plus all of the councillors that enabled it, imo.

>>63920683
Burgers never look at themselves, they always project.

lotta of bongoloid cope in this thread

>>63921739
>lotta of

So how long does it take to fix a hydraulic failure?

>>63926519
>So how long does it take to fix a hydraulic failure?
There's also the problem of how to get it back to England or wherever it's supposed to be.
They might be waiting for tankers or carriers to align, or discussing whether to just put it on a cargo ship and carry it back.

>>63920635
Everything has been dealt with.
We should instead talk about what makes us great

>>63912210 (OP)
It's really sad. The UK used to have one of the world's most impressive militaries, and they produced some of the greatest military strategists, explorers and hunters the world has ever seen.

Now they are struggling to upgrade their armed forces, and are one of the most woke, anti-hunting countries in the Western world.

>>63913225
>It seems to be working out for them. London is still basically the financial centre of the world.
Who cares about that when youre people are becoming a minority and only 70%of your people are Brits in the country. GDPcels would turn your country into an open air concentration camp to see a graph go up
>>63913244
>Britain should deepen its economic ties with the rest of Europe.
True.
>>63920683
Seeing how western White people hate themselves is unreal, legit what are they thinking. Not even here(Balkan shithole) would this shit happen

>>63926570
>get back
India->Gulf->Europe

>>63913115
>Labour and the Tories agreed to turn Britain into an American vassal.
the UK was bankrupt and relied on the Americans buying their bonds to prevent cannabalism in exchange for not letting the empire go communist,

>>63927118
>Seeing how western White people hate themselves is unreal, legit what are they thinking. Not even here(Balkan shithole) would this shit happen
The UK and Ireland have politicians drenched in Indian and Arab money, half the labour and tory parter were getting russian cash to unil quite recently, virtually the whole tory erg was involved in dirty Russian money same with GB news, farage etc

>>63912210 (OP)
Something of a nothing burger. Though, wouldn't be surprised if MI6 niggers are doing something spooky and the official story is just that, a cover.

Maybe my hatred for the mongs that work in my government is impairing my view.

P.S. message to the 77th Brigade and GCHQ because I know you post here; you are fat spackers and everyone with a real job in the army laughs behind your fat sweaty backs

>>63912961
Wait until you hear who is paying the lease on Diego Garcia.

>the absolute state of the brits

>>63927118
>Not even here(Balkan shithole) would this shit happen
Shut the fuck up. Your mafias are actively trafficking your women everywhere to get raped and I guarantee there's child brothels all over your major cities. The difference is your press is bitchmade and up for purchase and won't report on it, so you just don't know.

>>63932551
>the absolute state of the brits
That's probably something to do with the F-35.
And by the sounds of it, the pilot did the right thing in making for a friendly airfield.

>>63933214
American trash -is- kind of bad.
The absolute state of the mutts.

>>63933214
Yeah its kind of hard to say this is a British failing if the plane actually was a write-off.

>>63932551
jesus, that embarrassing

>>63932551
>beyond repair on-site
Man, that pilot must have just limped in to the airfield.

>>63932551

>>63930277
Noone in GCHQ posts here.
This place is not nearly important enough. At best you get lone bong military autists and LLMs.

>>63912961
Given the US and UK draw from a common stockpile, I'd assume that the US takes the good missiles and gives Britain whatever's left lol. Britain is America's most subservient ally.

>>63933952
I wouldn't let the jeets touch it either

>>63933861
It's not a write-off. They can't repair it on site so they are partially dismantling it so can fit onto a transport plane. Maybe the engine is fucked and needs to be rebuilt?

>>63930277
GCHQ is a fuckugly building
Bring back Bletchley you cowards

>>63936376
>Noone in GCHQ posts here.
I wouldn't say that, there are some real freaks in British intelligence.
The Cambridge Five happened because of this and it remains true to a degree even today.

I could totally see GCHQ having a bunch of /b/tard oldfags and those would probably post on /k/ given their professional interests (possibly be /g/ natives though).

>>63937176
>Bring back Bletchley you cowards
I don't know how much time you've spent in old buildings like a manor house but they're impossible to insulate and have terrible climate control and require extensive and constant maintenance or they turn into a crumbling shithole in no time at all.
An ugly, modern concrete block is far, far more comfortable to live in.
You can't imagine how demoralising it is to live somewhere where the doors all stick at the start of a season and need to be adjusted because of swelling wood or shifting beams.
Where every room has a draft, where the wiring burns out good lightbulbs in no time, you can't have too many appliances running in one room and there's a lingering smell of damp in the plaster that gets into your washing if you try to hang it up indoors on a rainy day.

I'm a little bit triggered.

>>63937195
Kek just passing through, but I live in one of those buildings inhereted from my nan, not only is there now fun subsidence, but the roof of each floor is 25foot tall, the electrics kill LED lights like fucking crazy, the roof always leaks despite a new roof being put on (I need to re-cover the walls with new siding to stop side leaching)
There are random holes in the back rooms that used to have old boilers, half the garden concrete flooring with brick outlines from where they knocked down the servants quarters, half the internal walls have damp.

Kinda fun actually, but fixing the subsidence is going to cost a fortune on a massive 3 floor building like this (and attic/basement).
What's even more fun is it's semidetached and the neighbour is a crazy tier retired nurse that believes all medicine is poison, and is likely not going to agree to fixing the subsidence.

Kek.

>>63937259
Oof, I don't envy you anon.
At least if it's that kind of building, when done up you could probably rent out the wings as self-contained airbnbs or something. I see those places listed for a small fortune on airbnb.

>>63937097
They probably intentionally manufacture the missiles to be nonfunctional. America gets no benefits from the UK having nukes.

>>63932551
This is more a US problem if the f-35 can't be fixed even with US mechanics on site.
Maybe the aircraft is still under warranty.

>>63920683
>it's all russian propaganda

>>63940663
eh, it saves a little bit of money on nukes by having Britain pay rather than America. If Britain's paying $5bn to host more US-controlled NATO weapons, that's $5bn America can give to Israel or whatever.

>>63942184
>corporations don't give a fuck
That may actually cause the fall of the west but it's not because of this specific thing.

You ignored anon's post though which completely refuted your bullshit claim. And now you're just responding with a repitition of your claim that adds nothing to refute anon and adds nothing to your claim that England covers it up.
In fact it seems like they threw your guy in jail so I don't know how that's supposed to show them covering it up.

>>63942290
The multiple threads they are making on /k/ just to bitch about the UK pretty clearly displays their agenda for posting.

>>63912210 (OP)
>Six crew members from the aircraft carrier are at the airport, working in shifts, to keep an eye on the jet
Eh, it's fine.

>>63943628
>they're sneaking in 100kg of termite daily

>>63943639
Pretty sure they are just gonna ship it back.
There's a bunch of tools you need for a lot of the F135 engine maintenance.
.t worked on the F35 program for years

>>63916412
1 carrier that has planes is worth more than 2 carriers that don't.

>>63940663
US gave the UK and France nukes to get around nuclear arms limitation agreement "oh, those aren't mine. those are someone elses."

>>63944826
>US gave the UK and France nukes to get around nuclear arms limitation agreement
You do realise that the UK created nukes first, right? Like they invented it, right? Look up Tube Alloy Project. In fact, they trade it with the USA and then the USA kicked them out after WW2 and didn't give them any of the research of the Manhattan Project that the Brit scientists worked on. So the Bongs just finished their original project in the 50's.

>>63920683
>but since then it's all been pretty out in the open
They realized they don't need to hide it because no one will do anything about it even if they know.

>>63944826
You do realize that the US attempted to hamstring British attempts to make nukes? They were completely against the UK having nukes until they succeeded. That's when they switched to trying to strategically limit UK nuclear autonomy.
The US has always had a policy of limiting proliferation among allies. That's why South Korea, for example, hasn't made one yet. They know they'd lose their US support.
Just because they hand off the nukes to France and the UK to artificially reduce their stockpile numbers doesn't mean they were magnanimously trying to share the wealth.

>>63946060
UK and French nukes were tolerated because they were whites.
SK is a vassal, but not a racial equal.

>>63944853
>You do realise that the UK created nukes first, right? Like they invented it, right? Look up Tube Alloy Project.
The Manhattan Project was it's own thing and was a concurrent, but separate nuclear project with the Tube Alloy Project that later was combined with the TAP. The US was still the first to make nukes first britfag.