>>63915774
Bro long-range awacs killer missiles fly at hypersonic speeds basically outside of the atmosphere and then hammer down on the target.
They cover several 100 miles in a minute or two.
How fucking far do you think a fucking subsonic AWACS heap of shit plane can move in a minute?
Newsflash: Not fucking far.
You could use both really short wavelength radar or optical in thermal band to keep tracking it. Above the clouds optical will be literally flawless, and if the awacs has to not only turn off it's radar, but also dive to the deck and run away, lmao then firing the missile was worth it already because your AWACS is gone and the enemy gets to shit on your blind fighters for free bro.
With modern multiseeker missiles, for which there is a lot of space in a long-range missile, you could easily even chase that down to the deck.
There's plenty of radar frequency ranges against stealth works poorly and you only need a relatively short range for terminal guidance.
Fuck against a target the size of an awacs diving to the deck while a missile rains down on it you could do SAR against the ground and target the mysterious hole in the ground that's moving at a couple 100 knts.
It's like you fucking retards are larping boomers and think in terms of electronics and avonics of the 70's.
Chinks already announced years ago that they're putting datalink, modern GaN AESA and optical all into one missile.
Ain't no hiding from that.
It's like you are totally and utterly clueless of how any of these dynamics work, otherwise you wouldn't be able to come up with these incredibly retarded ideas.
