China Builds New Large Jet-Powered Ekranoplan - /k/ (#63916998) [Archived: 655 hours ago]

Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:49:10 PM No.63916998
China-Ekranoplan-2025-06-30.jpg
China-Ekranoplan-2025-06-30.jpg
md5: dc9f5f3df6d27e829f0a63d33496b112🔍
GEV BROS WE ARE SO FUCKING BACK

https://www.navalnews.com/naval-news/2025/06/china-builds-new-jet-powered-large-ekranoplan/
Replies: >>63917001 >>63917423 >>63917510 >>63917676 >>63917759 >>63917781 >>63917797 >>63919980 >>63920266 >>63920944
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 2:49:40 PM No.63917001
>>63916998 (OP)
Implessive
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:15:43 PM No.63917423
>>63916998 (OP)
They're probably throwing a lot of shit at the wall in terms of landing craft and beachhead scenarios.
If I was a Chinese engineer with a crazy idea for how to put men and materiel ashore in short time and under fire, I'd be making some noise about it and seeing if someone will fund my project.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:37:40 PM No.63917510
>>63916998 (OP)
>General WuTang, we about to prepare testing for our ekranoplan.
>The what?
>That fancy boat plane, the type the Soviets had but never used?
>Oh, right, right, that one. Wow, we are going through a whole laundry list of new techniques here.
>We have to, General. To invade the imperialist Taiwan, we must use any and every technique that may work.
>Well, first it was the Chubby Girl-
>*ahem!*
>Huh? Oh, right the "Y-20." How many variants we got now? Three?
>Four, General. The crap ones with shitty Russian engines, the better ones with our glorious engines, the aerial refuelling one, and now the early airborne warning control one.
>Which one's that?
>The one with the fuck huge wok on top.
>Oh, that one! About time we got one of those. And the landing barges from Hainan?
>Three types sir. Also we floating the idea of using them for disaster relief at some point.
>Heh. Float.
>Sir...
>What? You said it.
>Also our glorious fighter programmes are proceeding well-
>Which one?
>Sir?
>Which one? We've got the J-20, the J-35, that three engine one, that other one, hell, that white emperor mock up almost had me.
>The, er, actually, I have to get back to you on that.
>See that you do. The only time I know we got another fighter programme is from the imperialist 4chan website.
>Sir, please, you promised the committee you'd stop sending them memes...
>I did! I'm only looking at what those imperialist pigs are saying about our new equipment.
>Let me guess, sir. "Impressive?"
>"Impressive."
>Every time.
>You'd think they'd get a better joke instead of using the same one over and over again. I'd like to see those round eye pigs say 治, 气, or 绿 like we do.
Replies: >>63917541 >>63917572 >>63917640 >>63917783 >>63917831 >>63919508 >>63919888 >>63920777
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:44:22 PM No.63917541
20210802_021959097_iOS
20210802_021959097_iOS
md5: c07d1a975fca2b55bda0b9871916821e🔍
>>63917510
That was, and dare i say it, an
Impressive
post, anon.
Replies: >>63917574
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:49:39 PM No.63917572
>>63917510
But is General Wu Tang someone to fuck with?
Replies: >>63917733
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 5:49:58 PM No.63917574
>>63917541
Replying to yourself is kind of pathetic anon.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:07:10 PM No.63917640
>>63917510
>Impressive
Fuck, I meant Implessive. My life is a joke.
Replies: >>63917783 >>63918932
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:15:05 PM No.63917676
>>63916998 (OP)
>rogue wave
>or really any sea that isn’t dead calm
>instead of being a bit splashy you crash into a wall of water at 300mph
stupid fucking idea. they don’t fly high enough to be safe at those speeds.
Replies: >>63917740
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:32:33 PM No.63917733
>>63917572
you may be able to 1v1 him, but you have 0 chance if the whole clan is involved
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:35:01 PM No.63917740
>>63917676
this one looks more "plane" like than the Soviet designs, it likely can fly at a higher altitude but not as efficiently
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:41:19 PM No.63917759
Rostislav_Alexeyev
Rostislav_Alexeyev
md5: ef1ef9e9a25fe4440923ed7dbd879ec5🔍
>>63916998 (OP)
>look how they massacred my boy
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:42:36 PM No.63917766
I wonder how well one would work in AShM or other cruise missile uses.

As I understand you get better fuel range and would automagically skim the sea surface at lowest possible altitude due to it's physics, right?
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:49:10 PM No.63917781
>>63916998 (OP)
>Doesn't work except in glass sea conditions
What a piece of shit.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:49:22 PM No.63917783
>>63917510
>>63917640
implesive is one of the funniest jokes, on pair with шeapons?
Replies: >>63918034
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 6:53:38 PM No.63917797
>>63916998 (OP)
>high wing configuration
>likely WIG!!!!
huh?
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 7:01:13 PM No.63917831
>>63917510
kekku
Norktard !5PczJ/8PMc
6/30/2025, 7:49:26 PM No.63918034
>>63917783
>шeapons?
It's 'ц' not 'ш', 'ц' is what you get if you accidently toggle a English/Russian keyboard trying to type 'w'. 'ш' would be
'i' if you screwed up.

>invented the meme
Replies: >>63918054
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 7:54:26 PM No.63918054
(You)
(You)
md5: 39b5320ff2d746d330ddc94b1b5b8b4f🔍
>>63918034
ok
Replies: >>63918072
Norktard !5PczJ/8PMc
6/30/2025, 7:58:48 PM No.63918072
>>63918054
Thank (you) kindly sir, i thought it important to explain that so our shitposters can put forth the highest quality bait as befitting the dignity of our forum.
Anonymous
6/30/2025, 11:49:18 PM No.63918932
>>63917640
i understood it as part of the joke, like this is translated from chinese and for them it's just normal to see it with an L
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 2:22:22 AM No.63919508
1698256568575863
1698256568575863
md5: 19948651869a3787cfb0a8ee2ec1142e🔍
>>63917510
Implessive
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 3:58:21 AM No.63919888
>>63917510
To be fair, nothing the Soviets had should be judged based on their use/non-use because the they never had a chance to use them. That's not to say ekranoplans are good, but rather the argument based on usage is false on its face. I'm sure the plan was to use them if they needed to invade via the Baltic or North Sea.
And Russian naval assets in general are shit, which is another reason to be at least generous with the concept.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 4:28:02 AM No.63919980
>>63916998 (OP)
sounds like good news usa won't be going to war anymore
Replies: >>63920604
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 5:59:09 AM No.63920266
>>63916998 (OP)
kino. Nafo gonna seethe
Replies: >>63920604
Norktard !5PczJ/8PMc
7/1/2025, 8:55:21 AM No.63920604
>>63919980
>>63920266
I wonder if they think these sort of posts will have any effect other than making people mock them.

They can't possibly be that stupid can they?
Replies: >>63920948
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 10:49:12 AM No.63920777
>>63917510
>General WuTang, we about to prepare testing for our ekranoplan.
>Is it for the children?
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 12:17:50 PM No.63920944
>>63916998 (OP)
implessive
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 12:19:08 PM No.63920948
>>63920604
>They can't possibly be that stupid can they?
>can they?
They very much can.