>shoot zero drones
>crash
>die
Su-34 is useless.

>>63921417 (OP)
But the first report said it was a su27 with 2 pilots (one flying, the other raping the pilot from behind)

>>63921417 (OP)
>Drones are useless because fighter jets
>F16 shoot down by drone not even trying to kill it
>Now this
>Like six jets+ getting droned
>Russian bombers that got droned
Im convinced you could just get a thousand shaed wuth shitty thermal optics and a few ir missile fill the sky with them and drone anything that flies with the thermal signature of a jet.

>>63921417 (OP)
According to trusted and neutral source, Aldolov Hitlersky-Banderov, head of propadand- uh public information in the ministry of Lebensrau.. uh defense, all Russian planes were shot down and Russia will be forced to accept lgbtqia marches in Moscow in about two weeks. Trust the basedcience!

>>63921417 (OP)
isnt it just a su27 in a bodykit?

>>63921458
I like how you guys are trying so hard to reclaim and memory hole 2 weeks.

>>63921458
Every Russian post is a projection

>>63921458
trying too hard there

>>63921476
Yes, it's su-27 all the way down. Like the t-72.

>>63921476
It's the russian equivalent of the Strike Eagle.

>>63921417 (OP)
>Su-34
>shoot drones
that's not what it's for

>>63921495
You still haven't realized that these are clowns. Their job is so say outlandish things so Putin and experts can step in and so the moderate and reasonable thing.

>>63921417 (OP)
Shame, its a really nice looking bird.
Slavs just cant in to airpower, no matter how much they try.

>>63921476
su27ub is also two-seated

>>63921517
So all of Russian society needs clown makeup, except for Putin and a handful of Boyars?

>su-34
>On drone duty

Seems retarded. Also anon comparing the Su-34 to Strike Eagle isn't right. The duck-faced Soviet bird is more bomber than the f-15e, being slower and almost 9 tons fatter.

>>63921515
>>63921599
If it flies, it's on drone duty.

>>63921476
It's a su-24 with a su-27 bodykit.
(24+27)/2=34

>>63921417 (OP)
I think the Su-34 could actually do a good job swatting stuff like Shaheds if you kitted it out with the USAF gear for doing so (APKWS racks and a laser targeting pod slaved to radar). It's fat and has plenty of fuel and hard points.

>>63921599
5 tons heavier than the Su-30
The Strike Eagle is 4.5 tons heavier (with CFT) than the F-15C
In both most of the weight increase comes from the extra fuel

>>63921627
>(24+27)/2=34
Kek

Behold, Ivan's fighter-bomber!

>>63921648
>In both most of the weight increase comes from the extra fuel
This is true for anything that flies. I was looking at the max takeoff weight of both birds.

>>63921476
No, it has a microwave oven

Good news from fighterporkner.

>>63921417 (OP)
Nothing to do with shooting drones. Su-34 had a landing gear failure. Video on fighterbomber's telegram.

>>63921417 (OP)
>the second pilot is still missing
I am sure he's around.

>>63921992
>Eternal flight, brother!

>>63922013
>over there, over there, and up there

They're rolling in their graves at the way war is evolving.

>>63922058
They're still wrong, russia just cant air war

>>63921476
It's flanker's sloth incest mutant brother sukhoi should have kept locked in the basement.

>>63921666
Finally someone else that gets it. The duck needs a code lyoko 5head though to really capture the fullback's visage

>>63922093
Just LOOK at this fucking thing, staring at you gormlessly

>>63922058
I feel like Sprey would love fpv drones since his ideal US military was essentially just a low tech spam force.

>>63922019
Eternal flight, shame about the landing.

>>63922103
>staring at you gormlessly

>>63921586
Actually, yes.

I recall a thread last week trying to boast russias su-34 production numbers and even by the inflated numbers he was giving for yearly production the visual losses this week have already exceeded it lmao

>>63922058
they wanted air to air warfare to be a rocket with wings on it, 2 aim-9's and the rest going into cannon rounds. no radar, no avionics, no datalink, none of that useless high tech shit cause its just dead weight, right? their idea was the aerial equivalent of meat waves.

>>63922011
>d-doesnt c-count, it w-was a landing g-gear
Imagine the epitaph - "Killied by a landing gear".

>>63921992
Would a different country just ditch the plane and tell the crew to jump in this circumstances? I haven't watched the video.

>>63922058
>sad jazz noices

>>63921437
Darling in the FRANXX
So this is why Anno is sych a slavboo...

>>63921476
Yes, but it has a toilet, treadmill, couch, TV, two Michelin star restaurant kitchen and a jacuzzi in the back of the cockpit.

>>63921992
attrition is a bitch
>>63926560
landing gear probably collapsed on landing, not failed to deploy like what I assume you think happened

>>63926737
>>63926560
I think they landed on their tail. The question is where they were ordered to do this, or whether they made it so that they were not sent to the infantry.