Thread 63922303 - /k/ [Archived: 725 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:27:40 PM No.63922303
1725352500264844_thumb.jpg
1725352500264844_thumb.jpg
md5: ab7887123d699b7dd212e49c33a8474d🔍
Is perfect CEP needed when the explosive radius of bombs is dozens of meters?
Replies: >>63922314 >>63922328 >>63922333 >>63922523 >>63922556
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:29:37 PM No.63922314
>>63922303 (OP)
it is when you are dropping a bomb down a ventilation shaft
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:30:47 PM No.63922321
Depends on how hardened the target is. If you are aiming at a landed helicopter it doesn't matter as long as it hits somewhere vaguely close to it but if it's a main battle tank your SDB needs pretty much a direct hit.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:32:24 PM No.63922328
>>63922303 (OP)
Depends on the nature of the target. Thin walled warehouses and wooden crates aren't the most durable of things.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:32:58 PM No.63922333
>>63922303 (OP)
The more precise your bomb is, the smaller your bomb can be, and then you can bring more bombs to the fight
Replies: >>63922346
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:34:07 PM No.63922346
>>63922333
Alternatively we can expand the targeting perimeters so broad that every hit is a success.
Replies: >>63922445 >>63922471 >>63922496
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:42:37 PM No.63922402
If the fuse is a proximity or instantaneous, it may react to the roof of the barn, and if a delayed detonation is used, it may sink into the ground and lose its destructive power.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:49:04 PM No.63922445
>>63922346
Because A = πr2 this is usually the worst option. There is definitely a small trade space where bigger warheads do give better results but it's not the norm. I can think of two examples for this: a 1-3lb warhead gives instant results on people while a 40mm nade or 30mm VOG often doesn't, and a 500-1000lb bomb kills well-armored vehicles like tanks or ifvs when thrown ~20 meters off target by GPS jamming in a way GMLRS warheads (50lb he/200lb total) won't.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:52:29 PM No.63922471
33p3bw
33p3bw
md5: 80e622a63cfbbe6ae15c486cc21122db🔍
>>63922346
You've almost got the right mindset. Just treat every bomb dropped as if it successfully hit it's target. They would never miss, after all.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:56:16 PM No.63922496
>>63922346
A higher volume of precision munitions is going to kill more targets than shitting fat bombs wherever they may land.
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 6:59:50 PM No.63922523
1751370653113796_thumb.jpg
1751370653113796_thumb.jpg
md5: 399964214002e30a158613b892d5fd5f🔍
>>63922303 (OP)
Zigger cope thread
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 7:05:09 PM No.63922556
>>63922303 (OP)
>this bomb managed to destroy easiest target in the world
>there will never going to be any more hardened targets so why bother aiming?
Replies: >>63923410
Anonymous
7/1/2025, 9:04:56 PM No.63923410
>>63922556
Regular hardened shelters are still viable.
Destroying deep buried nuclear processing centers that require six or more 30,000 lb bombs at a cost of $20MM per is only attainable by one country. No one else can even deliver the bomb to the target area much less build it.