Is perfect CEP needed when the explosive radius of bombs is dozens of meters?
>>63922303 (OP)it is when you are dropping a bomb down a ventilation shaft
Depends on how hardened the target is. If you are aiming at a landed helicopter it doesn't matter as long as it hits somewhere vaguely close to it but if it's a main battle tank your SDB needs pretty much a direct hit.
>>63922303 (OP)Depends on the nature of the target. Thin walled warehouses and wooden crates aren't the most durable of things.
>>63922303 (OP)The more precise your bomb is, the smaller your bomb can be, and then you can bring more bombs to the fight
>>63922333Alternatively we can expand the targeting perimeters so broad that every hit is a success.
If the fuse is a proximity or instantaneous, it may react to the roof of the barn, and if a delayed detonation is used, it may sink into the ground and lose its destructive power.
>>63922346Because A = πr2 this is usually the worst option. There is definitely a small trade space where bigger warheads do give better results but it's not the norm. I can think of two examples for this: a 1-3lb warhead gives instant results on people while a 40mm nade or 30mm VOG often doesn't, and a 500-1000lb bomb kills well-armored vehicles like tanks or ifvs when thrown ~20 meters off target by GPS jamming in a way GMLRS warheads (50lb he/200lb total) won't.
33p3bw
md5: 80e622a63cfbbe6ae15c486cc21122db
🔍
>>63922346You've almost got the right mindset. Just treat every bomb dropped as if it successfully hit it's target. They would never miss, after all.
>>63922346A higher volume of precision munitions is going to kill more targets than shitting fat bombs wherever they may land.
>>63922556Regular hardened shelters are still viable.
Destroying deep buried nuclear processing centers that require six or more 30,000 lb bombs at a cost of $20MM per is only attainable by one country. No one else can even deliver the bomb to the target area much less build it.