← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 63922303

13 posts 6 images /k/
Anonymous No.63922303 >>63922314 >>63922328 >>63922333 >>63922523 >>63922556
Is perfect CEP needed when the explosive radius of bombs is dozens of meters?
Anonymous No.63922314
>>63922303 (OP)
it is when you are dropping a bomb down a ventilation shaft
Anonymous No.63922321
Depends on how hardened the target is. If you are aiming at a landed helicopter it doesn't matter as long as it hits somewhere vaguely close to it but if it's a main battle tank your SDB needs pretty much a direct hit.
Anonymous No.63922328
>>63922303 (OP)
Depends on the nature of the target. Thin walled warehouses and wooden crates aren't the most durable of things.
Anonymous No.63922333 >>63922346
>>63922303 (OP)
The more precise your bomb is, the smaller your bomb can be, and then you can bring more bombs to the fight
Anonymous No.63922346 >>63922445 >>63922471 >>63922496
>>63922333
Alternatively we can expand the targeting perimeters so broad that every hit is a success.
Anonymous No.63922402
If the fuse is a proximity or instantaneous, it may react to the roof of the barn, and if a delayed detonation is used, it may sink into the ground and lose its destructive power.
Anonymous No.63922445
>>63922346
Because A = πr2 this is usually the worst option. There is definitely a small trade space where bigger warheads do give better results but it's not the norm. I can think of two examples for this: a 1-3lb warhead gives instant results on people while a 40mm nade or 30mm VOG often doesn't, and a 500-1000lb bomb kills well-armored vehicles like tanks or ifvs when thrown ~20 meters off target by GPS jamming in a way GMLRS warheads (50lb he/200lb total) won't.
Anonymous No.63922471
>>63922346
You've almost got the right mindset. Just treat every bomb dropped as if it successfully hit it's target. They would never miss, after all.
Anonymous No.63922496
>>63922346
A higher volume of precision munitions is going to kill more targets than shitting fat bombs wherever they may land.
Anonymous No.63922523
>>63922303 (OP)
Zigger cope thread
Anonymous No.63922556 >>63923410
>>63922303 (OP)
>this bomb managed to destroy easiest target in the world
>there will never going to be any more hardened targets so why bother aiming?
Anonymous No.63923410
>>63922556
Regular hardened shelters are still viable.
Destroying deep buried nuclear processing centers that require six or more 30,000 lb bombs at a cost of $20MM per is only attainable by one country. No one else can even deliver the bomb to the target area much less build it.