← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 63936178

8 posts 6 images /k/
Anonymous No.63936178 >>63936196 >>63936238 >>63936260 >>63936270 >>63936734 >>63939095
what is the tactical advantage of advancing in thin lines that can be easily cut off?
Anonymous No.63936192
If they can be, why haven't they done it in the past week or two it has existed?

Because it can't be easily cut off
Anonymous No.63936196
>>63936178 (OP)
all advances are essentially channels along logistical supply lines
this is the breakthrough in perspective that enabled airland battle, the front does not consist of a solid line on a map but rather a murky area of control with enemy control being limited to within the thin channel behind them
Anonymous No.63936238
>>63936178 (OP)
Classic pincer and encirclement movement. Truely brilliant!
Anonymous No.63936260
>>63936178 (OP)
>advancing in thin lines
More like... DeepStatemap copium.
Anonymous No.63936270
>>63936178 (OP)
>easily cut off
Anonymous No.63936734
>>63936178 (OP)
I would have answered "That's the road dumbass" but there's no road so huh, what the hell are they doing
Anonymous No.63939095
>>63936178 (OP)
> in thin lines
even this chokepoint between Yalta and Zirka is still like 200 yards thick - not that unbelievable, similar stuff did happen during WW 2

also it's proably just extrapolations - like they know that forces are in Zirka and Paddubne so they make a Voronoi diagram out of it or whatever they are called