← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 63938287

66 posts 26 images /k/
Anonymous No.63938287 [Report] >>63938299 >>63938307 >>63938322 >>63938334 >>63938373 >>63938528 >>63938558 >>63938844 >>63938852 >>63938895 >>63939057 >>63939963 >>63940120
How would the US defend against a hostile aircraft carrier operating from the east coast?
Anonymous No.63938299 [Report] >>63938324
>>63938287 (OP)
Considering you said carrier and not carrier battle group I'd probably send an LA class for funsies when they passed by the IDL.
Anonymous No.63938301 [Report] >>63938324
Mk48 ADCAP
Anonymous No.63938307 [Report] >>63938340 >>63938352
>>63938287 (OP)
>defend against a hostile aircraft carrier operating from the east coast
>shows a picture of an aircraft carrier operating off the west coast
wewlad
Anonymous No.63938322 [Report] >>63938352 >>63938867
>>63938287 (OP)
>from the east coast
Does this carrier have teleportation ability? Is it in a state of flux? Because that's the West coast you fucking moron. Also, easy, you send a Virginia and sink it.
Anonymous No.63938324 [Report] >>63938333 >>63938338 >>63938347 >>63938477 >>63938579
>>63938299
>>63938301

Did you miss that china developed anti-torpedo torpedos?
I'm not joking.
Anonymous No.63938328 [Report] >>63939413
I load up speedboats with fudds with 1911's and have them swarm the carrier, capture it and then sail it to San Diego.
Anonymous No.63938333 [Report]
>>63938324
So did the US, in like 2017. They ended the trial in 2018. It's a meme.
Anonymous No.63938334 [Report]
>>63938287 (OP)
Detonate nukes underwater near a fault line to cause a tsunami.
Anonymous No.63938338 [Report]
>>63938324
>Did you miss that china developed anti-torpedo torpedos?
>I'm not joking.
Anonymous No.63938340 [Report] >>63938352
>>63938307
It's east if you're from the west of the US but very unconventional in choice of term.
Anonymous No.63938347 [Report]
>>63938324
Well yeah, so did the US Navy. Cancelled because of performance and the fact that it messed with other countermeasures. If the US Navy tried and couldn't make it work, China's claim of having one worth a fuck goes into the toilet.
Anonymous No.63938352 [Report] >>63938367
>>63938307
>>63938322
>>63938340
>operating from the east coast
I guess he meant the east coast of China
Anonymous No.63938367 [Report]
>>63938352
China only has one coast. No need to specify.
Anonymous No.63938373 [Report] >>63938413 >>63938450 >>63938567
>>63938287 (OP)
How would any aircraft carrier get within 2000 km of America without getting face fucked by anti-ship weapons?
Anonymous No.63938413 [Report] >>63938440 >>63940274
>>63938373
What the fuck is a km?
Anonymous No.63938440 [Report]
>>63938413
I have no idea, but the picture says the dorito can go 2000 of them. Must not be that big, in my experience doritos don't fly very far. Perhaps they have doritos that can fly all the way from the pantry to my mouth now, what an innovation
Anonymous No.63938450 [Report] >>63938464 >>63938485 >>63938493 >>63938509 >>63938594 >>63938654 >>63938763 >>63939429 >>63940230
>>63938373
>anti-ship weapons

What anti-ship weapons? The US has no modern anti-ship weapons. Everything they have is subsonic garbage only suitable to basically shoot unarmed fishingboats.
Trivially intercepted.
Anonymous No.63938464 [Report]
>>63938450
>Trivially intercepted
Anonymous No.63938477 [Report]
>>63938324
Implessive
Anonymous No.63938485 [Report]
>>63938450
Screencapping this for when the chinese navy is a scuba diving attraction.
Anonymous No.63938493 [Report]
>>63938450
>Trivially intercepted
Funny, I was about to say the same thing about the Chinese carrier
Anonymous No.63938509 [Report]
>>63938450
>What anti-ship weapons
This bad boy, still in the packing crate.
Anonymous No.63938528 [Report]
>>63938287 (OP)
They'd use a plane with 3,000 km combat radius.
Anonymous No.63938548 [Report]
OK Chang I'll bite. A nuclear strike, because in order for this scenario to be even plausible requires the almost complete destruction of both the USN and USAF. The US isn't going to suffer those kind of losses and then allow a fleet to come close enough to the mainland to launch strikes. If they have no conventional options left, they simply declare a line of longitude and say anything operating beyond that point will be nuked without warning.
Anonymous No.63938558 [Report]
>>63938287 (OP)
I'd assume with aircrafts, anti air, anti ship missiles, submarines or surface vessels
Anonymous No.63938567 [Report]
>>63938373
As long as it's in international waters, they could sail anywhere. Of course they would be shadowed by US ships as soon as they got anywhere near our coast. They are also well within the range of land based aircraft and missiles.
Anonymous No.63938579 [Report]
>>63938324
>anti-torpedo torpedos
>hostile aircraft
Anonymous No.63938594 [Report]
>>63938450
>only suitable to basically shoot unarmed fishingboats
So most of the Chinese navy?
Anonymous No.63938654 [Report] >>63938674 >>63938763
>>63938450
AIM-174B can do anti-ship attacks at Mach 3+

And that doesn't include the upgraded SM-6 Block Ib that can supposedly do Mach 5+.
Anonymous No.63938674 [Report] >>63938680 >>63938702
>>63938654
Warhead size?
Anonymous No.63938680 [Report]
>>63938674
enough to destroy a cardboard changboat
Anonymous No.63938702 [Report]
>>63938674
Big enough

It's also air-launched by the F/A-18E which can carry multiple missiles.

The YJ-12 is only air launched from long range bombers (big targets) or the JH-7 fighter bomber, but the JH-7 can only fit 1 YJ-12 missile.
Anonymous No.63938763 [Report]
>>63938450
see >>63938654
Also PrSM (Increment 2 and above). Velocity is not declared, but given PrSM is the replacement for the Mach 3+ ATACMS, and PrSM Inc 2+ was declared has having range and velocity improvements on top of that, we can assume Mach 5+.
Anonymous No.63938788 [Report] >>63938814 >>63938818 >>63940405
Theres been a highly dedicated chink shill inn every thread that could possibly attract one today, and now this. Its always one guy, this isnt how shillfarming usually works (many indians). im pretty sure its just one highly dedicated schizo doing it for free.
Anonymous No.63938814 [Report] >>63940295
>>63938788
/k/ has a recent history of obsessed retards getting mindbroken by /k/ not biting on propaganda trains.
a few other lolcows come to mind, like helmettard, armatard, warriortard, and mandick.
all extremely obsessive mentally ill people that destroy their own lives by spending all their time shilling on an anonymous imageboard and being so bad at it that their writing styles get detected after like 5-10 posts.
oh and i forgot to mention that one schizophrenic czech guy that spams his treasured BBC folder here every once in a while when he's feeling particularly mad.
someone should write a thesis on the behaviour and mentality of always-online forum-obsessed post-spamming lolcows desu, would be a nice read.
Anonymous No.63938818 [Report] >>63938823 >>63940346
>>63938788
yeah, someone's trying to make a name for themselves as chinktard, unironically posting from chinese ip's too
Anonymous No.63938823 [Report]
>>63938818
you can never tell if these people are just pretending to be retarded or are real characters.
doesn't really matter, though, baittards will never understand they're just as pathetic a failure as the mentally ill people they imitate for attention.
Anonymous No.63938844 [Report] >>63938857
>>63938287 (OP)
shit and fart and sink to the bottom of the ocean. yes america sinks, not the carrier.
Anonymous No.63938852 [Report] >>63938859
>>63938287 (OP)
Implessive
Anonymous No.63938857 [Report]
>>63938844
atlantis-pilled
Anonymous No.63938859 [Report]
>>63938852
>implessive
you know what's not implessive, spamming the same 2 videos for an entire year desperately going *hint hint, nudge nudge* hoping desperately that people believe it's a 6th gen, because chinks got spooked by the US nearing completion of it's ACTUAL 6TH gen.
Anonymous No.63938867 [Report]
>>63938322
the chinks have achieved the Philadelphia Effect, we should just surrender now
Anonymous No.63938895 [Report]
>>63938287 (OP)
By not letting it get there. You know, the whole purpose of the USN.
>But nuh uhh the PLAN is working on a sooper dooper submarine carrier!
I am sure it'll be implessive. Now I am going to go back to monitoring my ribs sitting in my smoker.
Anonymous No.63939057 [Report]
>>63938287 (OP)
Probably by hitting it with about $800 million in precision guided munitions in coordinated simultaneous strike attack and turning it into an artifical reef.

Any aircraft it managed to launch will be intercepted by fighters operating out of the dozen or so active airbases in range, the skies will be crawling with USAF and ANG aircraft.
Anonymous No.63939413 [Report]
>>63938328
San Diego? No, let's go 30 more feet to Tijuana.
Anonymous No.63939429 [Report] >>63939435
>>63938450
We don't even need anti-ship weapons, a B-2 Spirit opening its bomb bay doors in the vicinity and dropping a load of 500 pound bombs for the keks and shreks
>intercept this ya slope
Anonymous No.63939435 [Report] >>63940241
>>63939429
>Excuse me sir and or madam, your parking permit is denied.
Anonymous No.63939963 [Report]
>>63938287 (OP)
By defending Burger Town. But honestly China has nothing to gain from trying to conventionally attack America's mainland. They ain't invading shit.
Anonymous No.63940120 [Report]
>>63938287 (OP)
It depends. If the carrier's aircraft were dropping napalm bombs I'd let them operate for a while just for fun. Get a free cleansing out of the deal.
With 25 subs on the west coast one should be able to sink the bastard on demand.
Anonymous No.63940208 [Report]
2010-2020
>CARRIERS ARE OBSOLETE! US SHIPS WILL SINK DUE TO SUPERIOR CHINESE MISSILE SPAM!
2020-2024
>CHINESE CARRIES ARE ONLY TO DEFEND AGAINST IMPERIALIST US! NO CHINESE CARRIERS ARE IMMUNE TO ANTI-SHIP MISISLES!
2025
>CHINESE CARRIERS WILL DOMINATE THE PACIFIC AND DOMINATE THE WEST COAST OF THE US!
I hate you duplicitous wumao faggots with all my heart. I take great joy in fucking your women that are desperate to come here and plant my seed into their womb. They enjoy my thick bwc and laugh when they talk about the tiny pinky that you chinkx call a penis.
Anonymous No.63940230 [Report]
>>63938450
Anon what do you think submarines do?
Anonymous No.63940241 [Report] >>63940246 >>63940286 >>63940369
>>63939435
Anonymous No.63940246 [Report] >>63940296
>>63940241
Yet no one has managed to shoot down a B-2. Curious.
Anonymous No.63940274 [Report]
>>63938413
About ten football field lengths
Anonymous No.63940286 [Report]
>>63940241
and?
what is the implication of this post supposed to be, that you're mad and you invoke the
>B-BUT SERBS SHOT ONE DOWN WHEN THEY KNEW EXACTLY WHEN IT LEFT THE AIRPORT, WHERE IT WAS GOING, AND WHAT ROUTE IT WAS TAKING, AND HIT IT WITH A RADAR SWEEP EXACTLY WHEN IT OPENED BOMB-BAY DOORS
oh no guys, stealth is obsolete now.
Anonymous No.63940295 [Report] >>63940311
>>63938814
>obsessed retards getting mindbroken by /k/ not biting on propaganda trains
It's been hilarious watching thirdies get buttmad that a board with some of the biggest weapon/military autists on the internet can easily call out their blatant lies about weapons/militaries, and then lash out by spamming more bullshit that makes it extremely evident that they don't frequent the board and only came here to spam propaganda. My favorite was earlier on when they used the term '/K/opers" or something of the like to try to imply that anyone who didn't believe their obvious bullshit was an outsider, while showing themselves to be an obvious outsider.
Anonymous No.63940296 [Report] >>63940365 >>63940375 >>63942949
>>63940246
US would never acknowledge a B-2 being shotdown
just like they keep claiming no F-15s have been shotdown despite Iraqis having physical evidence of one
Anonymous No.63940311 [Report] >>63940391
>>63940295
my personal favorite was /k/eddit and /k/edditors
Anonymous No.63940346 [Report]
>>63938818
QRD on how to run IP checks?
Anonymous No.63940365 [Report]
>>63940296
I heard there were no American forces in Baghdad too.
Anonymous No.63940369 [Report]
>>63940241
>3
It's 1.5
Anonymous No.63940375 [Report]
>>63940296
Just because Iraqis have parts of a 15 doesn't mean that they managed to shoot one down.
Anonymous No.63940391 [Report]
>>63940311
they've learned to stop doing it now, but early war many of the vatnik tourists were saying THAT, and simultaniously constantly linking war subreddit links everywhere.
Anonymous No.63940405 [Report]
>>63938788
They are pissed that the chinese supposedly invented fireworks but the first thing anyone anywhere on Earth associates them with is 4th of July. Even chinks think of us first.
Anonymous No.63942949 [Report]
>>63940296
The claim is that no F-15s have been shot down in air to air combat you mongoloid. Two were shot down by AAA and SA-2 during the Gulf War, and we know this because THE FUCKING AIR FORCE TOLD US.