>>63944686Kinda. You need a dedicated schoolhouse, dedicated sniper units, and dedicated training resources to keep the skillset fresh. When budget cuts start getting floated they're often an easy target because people erroneously assume you can do the same shit with designated marksmen or home station training or whatever. Much cheaper to disband all that shit and tell units "figure it out lol" until a war kicks off again and you realize you need people who can provide precise, continuous, on-the-ground reconnaissance with dedicated training and tradecraft for mitigating enemy detection systems.
>>63943886They don't need to be a "decisive factor" to be worth having, and if that's your argument, then I challenge you to name a war in which infantry, or armor, or artillery were the "decisive factor." Modern war is combined arms, and really modern war is multi-domain combined arms. Having people with one foot in the infantry skillset and one foot in the intelligence skillset is great for both the line units and the S2.
I know people also say drones made snipers obsolete, but I'd ask these people if they've ever tried hunting a sniper team in a disguised firing position from the air, or performing continuous recon using a DJI. Like everything in combined arms, there are drawbacks and advantages to both systems, and they compliment rather than detract from each other.
>>63944721Doesn't help that the DoD keeps making retarded decisions with procurement. See the MRAD debacle.
That said, compared to consumable drone systems, armored vehicles, or missiles, sniper rifles are dirt cheap. Maybe $20-30k for the rifle with all accessories included, $1-5 per shot depending on caliber and projectile. Compare to a $100k Javelin, $1000 drones that you expend thousands of per month, etc.