Thread 63957730

Thinking about picking one up + a silencer once the tax stamp goes to $0.

>>63957730 (OP)
caliber?

>>63957780
10.2mm Imperial German ordnance.

>TP9
What do you think, faggot?

>>63957730 (OP)
do your research on mag costs if budget is a concern other than that buy it.

>>63957788
wow, rude.

boutique gun. buy it if you work in stem, no sweat. But if you're less than upper middle class you're throwing money after rich people dumb shit.

>>63957788
>mp5
>not 5mm
>g36
>not 36mm
>m16
>not 16mm

it's almost like the name of the gun does not always represent it's caliber

>>63957730 (OP)
B&T is kind of like a higher quality Swiss Kel-Tec.
If you're going to two stamp it, the integrally suppressed APC/SPCs seem a lot cooler, unless you're trying to LARP as Leon.

>>63957806
lern 2 reed

>>63957825
plz do not be THIS autistic

>>63957846
I get the obvious sarcasm. I'm still calling you a faggot.

>>63957796
Post more giant tits please.

>>63957798
>he thinks stem = money
Alright Bubba. Don’t you have to get back to shooting empty beer cans with your cheapshit AR?

Trigger is absolute ass. UMP-tier. Try before you buy.

>>63959605
The pro has a far better stock trigger than the standard tp9.

>>63959577
>aggro out of nowhere
what's your problem, bucko?

>>63957730 (OP)
>Should I buy a TP9 pro?
Do you have past experience with that PDW in particular from B&T or ones like it and did you enjoy shooting it? Also why this over say CZ scorpion or MP5K instead? Are you gonna actually carry this thing around with you or is it just gonna be a fun larp toy? Lastly are you a trigger snob?
Ask yourself those questions before you go drawing money from the bank.

>>63960129
>>63959605
>The pro has a far better stock trigger than the standard tp9.
I've heard it's only mildly better. Worst thing I ever shot in terms of trigger pull was an older generation Glock which I didn't think was that bad but then again I'm no trigger snob, non the less I understand why people complained about it so much back then as it is very spongy.

>>63961440
It's a night and day difference. The gigliotti trigger I have in my tp9 is just as good if not a little better than the pro. It's still no 1911 trigger and never will be, but the pro is much better than the standard. The pro has a usable trigger while the standard is dogshit.
>t. played with the pro at SHOT, although I apparently didn't take a pic of it

So you hedged your entire purchase on the extra $200 and not the registration itself? Fucking brokie.

>>63957730 (OP)
1. GOA is suing the government to get the registration done away with entirely, based on precedent defending the NFA as being Constitutional because it's a tax and Congress can tax things—but if the "tax" is $0 then it's not really a tax, is it?—so you may want to hold off a little longer
2. if the stamp being $200 was holding you back, you probably can't actually afford B&T products
3. maybe I'm not the target market for this, but I don't understand the sunk optic cut—anything you put on the top rail is going to completely fuck your sight picture through your Aimpoint ACRO P2

IMO these are one of the less nice things B&T make. I tried one at a B&T factory event. The whole thing is plastic and feels crappy, and the picatinny rail was also plastic which I HATE, feels like a $200 M&P 15&22.

It's not an exceptionally nice thing to shoot either, trigger pull is poor and because the bolt reciprocates directly over the pistol grip the whole thing tries to rock back and forth in your hands more than a 9mm PDW should.

>>63962143
>>63963699
>if a $400 discount entices you to buy something, that means you couldn’t afford it before
I hate retards

>>63963699
>based on precedent defending the NFA as being Constitutional because it's a tax and Congress can tax things—but if the "tax" is $0 then it's not really a tax, is it?—so you may want to hold off a little longer

everyone on /k/ and the 2a world is parroting this phrase as if they actually know if its a true statement or not.

>>63963699
>GOA is suing
I don't have hopes for their success because next budget bill the $0 could easily change. The only thing GOA has going was the NFA removal language was in the bill before the senate parlamentarian removed it.

>>63964088
It's the core of the argument that stripped the individual mandate from the ACA. Slightly different situation yes, but if the tax is 0 and the items fall under GCA and FOPA (no registration allowed) then requiring registration to prove tax paid violates the law. There's already precedent and if GOA aren't pants on head retarded they'll use it.