>>63962572
40-50cpr is the going rate for brass these days even for 223, its not getting any cheaper. as for imports thats a long waiting game but its probably not coming back
>>63962817
I mean if you have 650 to blow for a range toy or gun you wont feel guilty about abusing go for it. if its your first/only gun no. im tempted to buy one myself just to abuse but I dont need another 5.56 gat
underfolders are a vibe but my god they suck for shooting, its basically made for mag dumping 25 feet at trash
>>63963744
id lean yeah but with ammo imports being kill we're about to see alot of "rare" gucci ak's being dumped for cheap in the coming years I feel, especially 5.45. all those retards that dropped $2k-$3k for some uber "rare" "museum grade" saiga/vepr motherland 5.45 because they got shilled into FOMO is going to be eating a huge lose. nobody wants to shoot a commie gun for .80cpr with $60-$100+ mags lmfao
>>63985372
i'd say PSA ak's are fine as long as you autisticly inspect it before you sign the paperwork. one you sign it its your gun and used. order rifle, check rivets, check fsb and sight block for cant. turn rifle face down on sights and check they are squared up or at least close enough to your autistic liking, make sure to check the gas block too, the sights can be 100% and the gas block can be off center too. usually not an issue but it does make the carrier bind and torque a little and if you were to install a rail or ultimak it could be in issue. inspect the carrier for shit machining or abnormal wear (ie paint missing)
we did this even on new arsenal sgl and slr rifles. if you do all this and it fails just reject it and send it back for a refund or replacement, once you sign the 4473 you're fucked and its your baby then you get to play the customer service/ups/oem/ups/ffl game ad nauseam until they tell "nyet rifle is in spec, good day comrade"
this goes for all guns btw, inspect the fucking things before you sign it over
>>63986428
PSA sadly
