The fact that militaries and police agencies have to fucking fudge requirements and scores to let in women as infantry recruits anyway, because they are completely unable to qualify by male standards, is bad enough as it is, but men by pure human instinct WILL treat women differently from other men, in ways they really shouldn't, but simply will because they are men and cannot help it.
When a woman in a man's group is under attack or otherwise in immediate danger, a man who understands that he's strong enough is fundamentally wired to respond to that, and likely to do so at perhaps needless risk to himself or his nearby peer males. This can be a good thing in civilian life, but is a big fucking problem in combat deployments.
Setting aside that a man presenting the same kinds of requirement scores as a woman would disqualify him, I can accept women in some non-grunt and non-beat-cop roles.
>>63968579What do YOU do for a living?
>>63968625Engineering doesn't call for male upper body strength, or ironclad resolution and the will to make the right sacrifices in deadly combat engagements.
If you've got good enough brains as a woman, you can be some kind of engineer, you just need to intellectually understand your field and what you're trying to do, as well as know how to convey and employ things. Men and women's brains fundamentally different in many ways, but also still the same in many others.