>>63975074 (OP)I've had a few. I like them, I think they are neat, but too heavy to make a good modern CC gun. No trouble shooting one and they are solidly built. There's always a normie who gets really excited and wants to buy it off me for some unreasonable amount of money.
>>63975183Eh they aren't that bad, just outdated by modern standards. Too heavy to carry, too underpowered and low capacity as well. I'm not a fan of DA/SA with slide mounted decocker safeties either, but other people have differing tastes on the matter.
>>63975311Makarov is more solid but also more chunky. Doesn't really improve on the design by a whole lot.
The CZ82 is an exception in that it is basically a super-Makarov but it's also a bit chunky on the grip owing to the 12rd magazines. Not a bad CC gun if you want to carry something milsurp, and the 83 is available if you want 380/32.
>>63976381I have one and honestly I'm not a big fan. Crummy trigger, microscopic sights, I get that it is meant for instinctive point shooting but sometimes I just want something with usable sights and a trigger that doesn't feel like a flare gun. God help you on field stripping as well.
>>63976558Very hit or miss on quality. Some are great, some are complete lemons that will pinball back/forth to Versa for multiple repairs and will never get unfucked.
>>63979667Well, sort of like Mexicans only they don't like to say what รถpa did between 1939 and 1945.