>>64002599
>e to its climb rate until the 152 rolled out. D
The 152 had worse climb rate than the normal 190D, climb rate isn't the only useful metric. The main problem of the 190-A was the single stage with low critical altitude and the bad range becase Germans didn't develop a long range single engine fighter.
>. I'm also talking about the Merlin and how is the Griffin Spit not comparable
Obviously they weren't comparable, what's why I said "And the Griffon Spitfire wasn't comparable."
> has the same high octane fuel
German kinda could make HO avgas at the cost of an absurd amount of steel. Their main problem wasn't the fuel pre collapse of their industry but the nearly absolute lack and rationing of strategic metals to make things like exhaust valves, even if they could improve the octane of the C3 it would take months for designers to improve the engine to withstand the thermal stress of a higher boost. After 1942 most engineering efforts of Germany were related to ersatz models regardless their reserves of metals, that delayed their industry.
> dogshit airframe.
Unrelated. ASAT
>wasn’t Bavarian despite being superior to the 110 in every way.
I know the German goverment had an absurd favoritism and stupid mistakes, far worse was their lack of real aircraft for anti naval warfare and escorts, less stupid bombers and longer range fighters for their offensive forces. That was unrelated to Messerschmitt. Neither was he related to never adopting a high altitude variant of the BMW 801 or taking advantage of the better FW cowling to adapt larger radials like Japan began to do during the end of the war.
England wasted a lot of time with bad engine designs and the US had their marvelous compartmentalization that gimped the Allison V12, role segmentation is hell.
