First live fire test of Meteor from KF-21 released - /k/ (#63990931) [Archived: 149 hours ago]

Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:37:31 PM No.63990931
KF-21-AIM-2000-METEOR_thumb.jpg
KF-21-AIM-2000-METEOR_thumb.jpg
md5: 3f21afae5e13477f07fd37df48f01d8e๐Ÿ”
https://defence-blog.com/south-koreas-next-gen-jet-marks-progress-in-testing/
>South Koreaโ€™s KF-21 Boramae program took another major step toward operational readiness as its sixth prototype aircraft completed a series of high-stakes test flights, including air-to-air gunnery and weapons separation trials, program officials confirmed this week.

>The advanced 4.5-generation fighter, developed by Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI), is on track to conclude its Block 1 development phase by early next year, with Block 2 enhancements set to follow immediately.

>Speaking after the latest test campaign, KAIโ€™s chief test pilot, Cha Myung-soo, described the intense pace of trials designed to refine the aircraftโ€™s flight control systems and ensure combat readiness.

>KAI confirmed that the program has already logged more than 1,300 sortiesโ€”roughly 70% of Block 1โ€™s planned flight tests. Recent milestones include successful air-to-air missile firings of the Meteor and AIM-2000, even under supersonic conditions and external fuel tank configurations.

>โ€œFrom initial glide tests to complex combat scenarios, the KF-21 has demonstrated steady progress,โ€ a KAI program engineer noted. โ€œThis puts us on schedule for the Republic of Korea Air Forceโ€™s operational evaluation early next year.โ€

>Beyond Block 1, Block 2 upgrades will introduce precision air-to-ground capabilities, further cementing the KF-21โ€™s role as South Koreaโ€™s next frontline fighter. Future variants are also expected to incorporate fully internal weapons bays for enhanced stealth.

Will KF-21 be able to make it into the market which are dominated by American and European aircraft?
Replies: >>63990937 >>63990960 >>63991042 >>63991069 >>63991751 >>63992045 >>63993743 >>63998037
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:38:28 PM No.63990933
>that missile turn
sick
Replies: >>63991328
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:40:08 PM No.63990937
>>63990931 (OP)
In 5 years KF-21 will have internal weapons bay and four dimensional thrust vectoring
Replies: >>63990943 >>63990944
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:42:02 PM No.63990943
>>63990937
but what about 5 dimensional thrust vectoring
Replies: >>63990952 >>63993091 >>63997863
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:42:17 PM No.63990944
>>63990937
>thrust vectoring
Is a gimmick in a world where BVR combat will be dominant.
Replies: >>63990948 >>63990952
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:44:05 PM No.63990948
>>63990944
newfag midwit alert
>how does not having to move my control surfaces help with stealth bro's?????
Replies: >>63991000 >>63991072 >>63991311 >>63991328
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:45:27 PM No.63990952
>>63990943
We will get there saaar.
>>63990944
F-22 has thrust vectoring but this thing is a multirole not an air superiority fighter. So we will just make a bigger version with thrust vectoring and equiped with 500km prototype hypersonic air to air missile.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:47:21 PM No.63990960
c21f6eb2-16e7-11e9-bd68-61a0d0b9ce58_1320x770_141600
>>63990931 (OP)
BTW we have F-35s.
Current KF-21 is not an air superiority fighter. It's a multirole fighter.
F-15Es are being used as a tactical bomber.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 1:58:52 PM No.63991000
J-36-and-J-50
J-36-and-J-50
md5: 606f033b2d2dbf2ecb264b95bec09151๐Ÿ”
>>63990948
Neither J-50 nor J-36 is equipped with thrust vector engines tho.
Replies: >>63991302 >>64003502
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 2:11:56 PM No.63991042
pepe-laugh-pepe-lol
pepe-laugh-pepe-lol
md5: 7561ace02fd881189f23566e715f12d0๐Ÿ”
>>63990931 (OP)
>stealth fighter
>uses external stores
Replies: >>63991099
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 2:21:43 PM No.63991069
>>63990931 (OP)
>all those fixed grills
>exposed cannon
>no IWB
>no internal TGP/sensor fusion
I have a feeling this project is doomed from the start.
Replies: >>63991099
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 2:22:45 PM No.63991072
>>63990948
If your is a bait then you're good.
Replies: >>63991302
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 2:32:04 PM No.63991099
>>63991042
>>63991069
They never said the first block is going to be stealth. Why are you so upset?
Replies: >>63991106
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 2:33:48 PM No.63991106
>>63991099
Because it's never going to be stealth. Even with a IWB it wouldn't even be close to stealth. Not to mention that with an IWB as seen by the current cutaway you would cut the total fuel in the central fuselage by more than hald and would requite a total rework.
Replies: >>63991290
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:46:12 PM No.63991290
GvBBG-xWMAEyi63
GvBBG-xWMAEyi63
md5: fc9436526ecea804ed8cf739f6788864๐Ÿ”
>>63991106
>Because it's never going to be stealth.
They why are they developing one right now?
https://x.com/fa50_defense/status/1915015955861868752
>Even with a IWB it wouldn't even be close to stealth.
Proof?
>Not to mention that with an IWB as seen by the current cutaway you would cut the total fuel in the central fuselage by more than hald and would requite a total rework.
They literally designed the fuselage with the iwb in mind though, which is why there's a space reserved for it.
Replies: >>63991301
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:47:33 PM No.63991296
Don't get the hate for this plane. It's a solid 4.5 gen for most thirdie countries
Replies: >>63991300 >>63991301
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:48:53 PM No.63991300
>>63991296
It's mostly chinks who can't get with the fact that J-35 aren't having any customers even though it's out for sale right now.
Replies: >>64003269
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:49:03 PM No.63991301
>>63991290
>gook armatard is back
>semi recessed
LMAOOOOO
>Proof?
Did you fucking look at the KF-21? all the exposed grills the exposed cannon, the need to mount a TGP outside etc.
It's never going to be stealth
>>63991296
>4.5
nah, 4th at most. to be closer to 5th gen it needs both stealth and sensor fusion and a really capable radar that can work as a mini AWACS, which it doesn't have.
Replies: >>63991319
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:49:15 PM No.63991302
>>63991000
i never said they were, i said what i said, and it applies to real stealth aircraft with TVC like the raptor.
>>63991072
>being correct on the usefulness of TVC in stealth aircraft is baiting
sure tard.
Replies: >>63991311
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:52:55 PM No.63991311
>>63991302
>sure tard.
we already had this discussion in an earlier thread and you got your ass handed to you. Supermanouverability is useless in the realm of BVR engagement, and saying that trust vectoring is for stealth ( how does not having to move my control surfaces help with stealth >>63990948 )
Just shows you don't even understand how a plane turns, you think an f22 turns without deflecting its control surfaces? fucking moron.
>inb4 i-it helps deflect them less
no it fucking doesn't.
Ask youself why no current 6th gen program has any plans to use TVC.
Replies: >>63991328
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:54:34 PM No.63991319
1752257277530
1752257277530
md5: 1e8ff3057be99bf169a5e8800362d853๐Ÿ”
>>63991301
>clearly says it's internal weapons bay
>semi recessed
You need to be over 18 to post here
>Did you fucking look at the KF-21? all the exposed grills the exposed cannon, the need to mount a TGP outside etc
Yeah, which can literally be trimmed away with a few reworks literally. Also, F-35 style DAS is in development for the new UCAV.
Replies: >>63991324
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:56:28 PM No.63991324
1661234701424049
1661234701424049
md5: d3d07569a6737be44bf5061dd78c5656๐Ÿ”
>>63991319
>Yeah, which
will never happen.
>F-35 style DAS is in development for the new UCAV
which will never happen.
Listen, everybody can promise the moon, but only one nation was able to deliver on it and you gooks have proven time and time again to just announce everything and deliver on nothing.
Replies: >>63991329
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:58:39 PM No.63991328
>>63991311
you're not talking to the guy you were talking about supermaneuverability with, sperg.
>>63990933
and >>63990948
are my only other posts ITT
>supermanouverability
>he thinks i was arguing that doing donuts helps with stealth
not having to move reflective control surfaces reduces the amount of angles to bounce radar off of and greatly improves stealth, it's one of the main reasons why the F22 has thrust vectoring, retarded little midwit.
>n-no it fucking doesn't
yeah, it does, in level flight, if you want to make a yawing motion to adjust course slightly, moving your control surfaces WILL make your radar return bigger, you're having a melty over a well-established fact for no reason.
>ask youself why no current 6th gen program has any plans to use TVC
because that's not true and you're wrong, lol.
Replies: >>63991330 >>63991354 >>63991367
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:58:40 PM No.63991329
84cd248d2244ddf9c71e70328cb6b7d9
84cd248d2244ddf9c71e70328cb6b7d9
md5: 6392f8e9992e84c78ab3d24b175dfa24๐Ÿ”
>>63991324
Whether you like it or not the UCAV is already being developed and the first prototype is scheduled to fly at the end of this year. Also, KF-21EX is already being pitched by KAI. So stop being in denial.
Replies: >>63991340
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 3:59:11 PM No.63991330
>>63991328
>you're not talking to the guy you were talking about supermaneuverability with, sperg.
it doesn't matter if you have the same retarded opinion
Replies: >>63991347
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:01:25 PM No.63991340
1674642423699414
1674642423699414
md5: 3144d110dc71977670a7ac505f9a9576๐Ÿ”
>>63991329
nice CGI image. We'll talk again when you'll actually deliver on even a single promise. (never)
Replies: >>63991349
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:02:02 PM No.63991347
>>63991330
i have no idea what the sperg you were talking with's opinion was, i never mentioned supermaneuverability, i mentioned the ability to make adjustments in flight profile without increasing your RCS value because moving flight surfaces generates additional reflective angles.

you're a flustered idiot and it's very clear you fucked up and misinterpreted bigtime and are now trying to double down on your spaghetti spill to save face.
calm the fuck down, lil nigga, i'm not your enemy.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:02:23 PM No.63991349
1751998699846
1751998699846
md5: 0ea05a0a73367b9471c8b4d8d80b4ed1๐Ÿ”
>>63991340
>nice CGI image
?
Replies: >>63991350 >>63991362
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:03:24 PM No.63991350
1751998573413
1751998573413
md5: c7e397462745ed46d87452d2100fd293๐Ÿ”
>>63991349
Replies: >>63991362
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:04:24 PM No.63991354
file
file
md5: 6c0e8c29deb6d6b15377ca92f52b9891๐Ÿ”
>>63991328
>ot having to move reflective control surfaces reduces the amount of angles to bounce radar off of and greatly improves stealth, it's one of the main reasons why the F22 has thrust vectoring, retarded little midwit
>yeah, it does, in level flight, if you want to make a yawing motion to adjust course slightly,
Jesus Christ you can't be that retarded and ignorant. I have literally spoken to multiple F-22 pilots and I can assure you that's not a real thing that they do lmao. Feel free to post a single source backing your claim
>because that's not true and you're wrong, lol.
feel free to post a single one.
Replies: >>63991374
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:06:10 PM No.63991362
>>63991349
>>63991350
Now show the DAS. lmao
>stealth drone
>external stores
lol
Replies: >>63991370
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:07:34 PM No.63991367
maxresdefault
maxresdefault
md5: 46b6e7eeecf116d0098fb1a66dcc3536๐Ÿ”
>>63991328
>yawing motion
>F-22 trust vectoring does not have yaw vectoring
Anon...
Replies: >>63991374
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:08:56 PM No.63991370
>>63991362
>Now show the DAS
Are having troubles with your vision, Anon?
Replies: >>63991372
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:09:33 PM No.63991372
>>63991370
Do you even know what a DAS is?
Replies: >>63991719
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:09:36 PM No.63991374
>>63991354
>i have literally talked
sure you have son, you're surely not naive enough to believe anyone on /k/ will believe that without imperical evidence, right?
>>63991367
strange, i wonder what those little moving surfaces between and to the side of the engines are
Replies: >>63991377 >>63991380 >>63991472 >>63992965
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:10:45 PM No.63991377
file
file
md5: 674e6525477bcbc019e29c0287057153๐Ÿ”
>>63991374
>strange, i wonder what those little moving surfaces between and to the side of the engines are
Well, sorry to burst your bubble but they are fixed you underaged newfag
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:11:46 PM No.63991380
file
file
md5: 85aa71acd31bf89d2aab2dc38a7e61f1๐Ÿ”
>>63991374
>you're surely not naive enough to believe anyone on /k/ will believe that without imperical evidence, right?
Why do you think I'm shitting on your "yaw the plane for stealth!" bullshit?
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 4:43:42 PM No.63991472
>>63991374
>imperical
it's empirical
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 5:55:22 PM No.63991719
>>63991372
Enlighten me
Replies: >>63992025
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 6:01:55 PM No.63991751
>>63990931 (OP)
0:25 ...and It Tracks!
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 7:20:15 PM No.63992025
happy-fredvaudroz
happy-fredvaudroz
md5: a6bb9260c19d55bfd080bbdeaf569c0c๐Ÿ”
>>63991719
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 7:24:19 PM No.63992045
>>63990931 (OP)
Still blows my mind that Meteor has been in service for less than a decade despite how old it is.
Anonymous
7/16/2025, 11:40:48 PM No.63992965
>>63991374
Not replying anymore?
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 12:13:38 AM No.63993091
>>63990943
This nigga would cross the beams...
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 4:03:58 AM No.63993743
>>63990931 (OP)
I still don't get why they cheaped out on the internal weapons bay for the first iteration. How hard can it be?
Replies: >>63994666
Anonymous
7/17/2025, 10:34:55 AM No.63994666
>>63993743
The countries who can afford a real stealth jet either bought the F-35 or built their own version. This is just meant to look like a 5th gen to trick dumb and corrupt third world countries.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 6:12:26 AM No.63997863
IMG_0353
IMG_0353
md5: a357401fb64ffa605965a18c194eed53๐Ÿ”
>>63990943
Canโ€™t even see it. Because it doesnโ€™t exist in our reality.
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 7:11:03 AM No.63998037
1723564012450373
1723564012450373
md5: 1275ad1ce3ecfacf96de56e726aab35e๐Ÿ”
>>63990931 (OP)
Embarrassing
Replies: >>64000937 >>64003100 >>64003494
Anonymous
7/18/2025, 11:15:11 PM No.64000937
>>63998037
Jesus fuck HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 10:43:41 AM No.64003100
>>63998037
No wonder the Japanese had such an easy time conquering Korea. Worst Korea can't into anything beside being run by weird cabals.
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 11:57:23 AM No.64003269
>>63991300
chinks and pakis have been flooding /k/ lately about the J-35
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 2:08:17 PM No.64003494
1752815463945328
1752815463945328
md5: d9108893b1f4508fa1539e459d648b36๐Ÿ”
>>63998037
Shit like this makes it clear they have no intention of this ever being stealth.
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 2:11:54 PM No.64003502
>>63991000
yeah and they have inferior stealth capabilities as a result
Replies: >>64003540
Anonymous
7/19/2025, 2:28:30 PM No.64003540
>>64003502
You're retarded. Thrust vectoring has nothing to do with stealth unless you're confusingnit with obfuscated engine exausts