>>63995362
>Personally I would use a normal milspec BCG and just deal with it being slightly over gassed when suppressed, if anything just keep the flatwire spring to swap in when suppressed only.
Changing the gas setting on the carrier is way way easier than swapping springs. Currently I've been running the H3 buffer and flatwire with the gas setting on full gas out of 4 positions, with the can, and have had flawless forced reset function 800 rounds
With the H3, with the can, if I turn the gas down one notch the forced reset stops being reliable.
I'm hoping going to less spring and less buffer weight (H2 and carbine), but turning the gas down using the carrier when suppressed, will still get reliable forced reset function.
My concern is that the forward bolt speed (which I think is what contributes to hammer follow light primer strikes on FRT/SS and true auto guns) is essentially independent of gassing, and is fixed by buffer weight and spring strength. I'm worried the H2 and carbine spring will hammer follow/light strike regardless of gassing, ammo, and can config.
>>63995368
I can't find it right now but I think Bootleg somewhere claims that in the full gas setting their carrier is the same as a mil-spec.
Gauging it would be a project. Probably best measured with high speed camera to compare rearward bolt speed vs a mil spec BCG setup, all other variables held constant.
>>63995372
>easier and cheaper
I'm sure I could get a single buffer and spring setup to run reliably regardless of can or ammo config in both forced reset mode and semi auto, but I guarantee it would be punchy as shit with way too high of an ROF for anything useful in forced reset mode, in order to reliably cycle duty ammo sans can.
