Thread 64004276

80% of soldiers in the Ukrainian war die from drones and another 10% from artillery. We're in exactly the same situation as in 1914, so why don't the two sides build fortified lines more than 10 km apart from which to send drones and shells at each other?

>>64004276 (OP)
I don't understand the question. How does the Ukraine war not already qualify as a "trench war using drones"?

>>64004288

no real continuous lines or static anti-drone systems that already exist, since the main use of the infantry currently is to empty the enemy's drone stock it would be more advantageous for both sides to do so

>>64004276 (OP)
>why dont 2 slavic shitholes build something
gee, i dont know.

>>64005808
1) that's not the main use of infantry. try talking to actual ukrainians (or russians or foreign fighters)
2) that's not how modern digging or modern defense works

>>64004276 (OP)
>80% of soldiers in the ukrainian war die from drones
midwit alert, we have no solid data on that.
you're a fucking idiot and probably a zoomer dronenigger that thinks the answer to everything is drones.

your post is obsolete because i can hit it with a drone, cunt.

>>64005877
NTA, there was a leak of cause of death data from a Russian hospital. He's still on several levels of extrapolation that he's too stupid to understand, but there is *a* data point he's drawing from.

>>64006023
i know about that, that's exactly why i was calling him a midwit.
he saw that and thought he found the holy grail of truthbombs instead of using the 2 seconds necessary to build an additional bit of interpretative understanding

>>64005877

I relied on a NATO report to say that, beyond that there are really retards who still think that classic infantry will not be relayed to something for niggers in sandals in few decades? Ground robots are being developed and are even already operational for certain tasks in China

>>64006181
>ground robots are being developed and are even already operational for certain tasks in china
implessive
can they operate autonomously without recharging for longer than a day? no? then they don't replace infantry
>i relied on a NATO report
yeah? and? 80% of REPORTED deaths are from drones, try, TRY to put two and two together, i surely don't have to fucking spell this out for you right?

>>64006181
>a NATO report
What NATO report? May I see it?

>>64006247
ok so if we follow your logic, either the drone pilots report their number of victims by keeping accounts or the disappearance of troops is reported without us knowing if they are drones or not?