← Home ← Back to /k/

Thread 64009810

15 posts 4 images /k/
Anonymous No.64009810 [Report] >>64009832 >>64009853 >>64009856 >>64009860 >>64009866 >>64010775 >>64010810 >>64010957
Nuclear Option
Is this game a realistic depiction of 21st century combat, lack of infantry aside? Is datalink / situational awareness actually this good now? Can SPAAGs / SAMs shoot down munitions this reliably?
Anonymous No.64009832 [Report]
>>64009810 (OP)
>>>/v/
Anonymous No.64009853 [Report]
>>64009810 (OP)
Must be a /k/ humor thread
Anonymous No.64009856 [Report]
>>64009810 (OP)
>>>/vg/
Anonymous No.64009860 [Report] >>64009877
>>64009810 (OP)
>>>/lgbt/
Anonymous No.64009866 [Report] >>64009879 >>64009937
>>64009810 (OP)
>>>/qa/
Anonymous No.64009877 [Report]
>>64009860
>>>/lmao/
Anonymous No.64009879 [Report]
>>64009866
>deleted
KWAB
Anonymous No.64009909 [Report]
SAMs still being SARH seems a bit retro for a game set in the future. Aren't most SAM systems active homing now?
Anonymous No.64009937 [Report] >>64009946
>>64009866
kys basednigger newfag desu, stay on topic
Anonymous No.64009946 [Report]
>>64009937
Bitchy sharty loser detected lol.
Anonymous No.64010775 [Report]
>>64009810 (OP)
>>>/z/
Anonymous No.64010810 [Report]
>>64009810 (OP)
It's a damn good game, but no, it's not realistic, it's still a game
Anonymous No.64010957 [Report] >>64013612
>>64009810 (OP)
Missiles are much smarter in the game than real life and you are much more aware of threats in the game than real life. Fighter pilots would love 360 awareness of launches than even tells them what type of missile is targeting them with its seeking type.
Anonymous No.64013612 [Report]
>>64010957
Missiles actually seem a little less capable in the game than the current bleeding edge. None of the A2A missiles have dual-mode seekers or thrust vectoring, and seem to have fairly poor flare rejection. I think the current AIM-9X probably outperforms the MMR-3, and the AIM-120D probably outperforms the Scythe.