Thread 64060838

I know its not /k/s favorite tank, but usually the bongs don't let people see inside the tank. Thought it was neat if anyone else wanted to see.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-mR4ZxuMV4

Dont they?

>>64060855
All the videos I have watched, they refuse to let the cameras inside

neat

>>64060838 (OP)
do they show the tactical teapot?

>>64060838 (OP)
Damn, manual loader and ammo inside?

>>64061089
would it be outside?

>>64061115
yeah like on abrahams

>>64060838 (OP)
>I know its not /k/s favorite tank
The people who shit on it because its the one of the few MBTs not designed around solely around being thrown into a Fulda Gap meatgrinder scenario.

>>64061168
Most of the people who actively shit on it are thirdie shills that get an anyeurism at anything British being mentioned.

Your average /k/ poster is ambivalent, or might throw out some factoid about its protection being historically better than most. At the end of the day it's a perfectly competent western tank. Wars wouldn't be won or lost based on whether an army equips itself with Challies, Abrams or Leo 2s.

>>64061299
>Most of the people who actively shit on it are thirdie shills that get an anyeurism at anything British being mentioned.
True.
Either having an intrinsic kneejerk seethe of the UK, or they are cheap spammers assaulting /k/ being paid by another country that do.

>>64061168
If you ignore the one time the usual suspects lost their shit when ukies put an anti drone cage on top of a Challenger and then they made over 30 cope cage threads about it in a few days (the 30 is actually not made up or hyperbole, rather the oppostite), then you can savely assume half of all times in the last two years when someone shat on it it was our local lolcow who has bongs live rent free in his head.

>>64061381
I didn't even know Ukros got them.
That's how much impact Challenger made.

Oh god, he's here.

>>64061115
american tank doctrine is to minimize the amount of ammo in the same space as the crew, if I understand it correctly.

>>64060838 (OP)
Very interesting, I know nothing about the bong gun so it's interesting to see it's caseless with bags and primer mags. It's also cramped as fuck by NATO standards, closer to a soviet tank.
I wish he talked about the effectiveness of HESH but I wouldn't be surprised if the bongs gave them orders not to talk about some things.

>>64061089
>>64061119
By using bag charges you can keep the rounds in the fighting compartment and just have an isolate box for the propellant charges.
I don't know if that's what they do but that would make sense.

I like all tanks. I think they are cool.

>>64060838 (OP)
check the warthunder forums for the best info on em.

>>64061299
>Wars wouldn't be won or lost based on whether an army equips itself with Challies, Abrams or Leo 2s.
b-but muh Warthunder stats!

>>64061299
>>64061770
We all know the single factor that decides the outcome of wars is the service pistol.

>>64061502
>like clockwork

>>64060838 (OP)
She looks so deliciously fat.

>>64061168
>its the one of the few MBTs not designed around solely around being thrown into a Fulda Gap meatgrinder scenario
Actually the opposite
The Chally was pretty much designed specifically for Fulda, like all NATO tanks

>>64060838 (OP)
Thank you anon, will check it out

>>64061299
Yep

End of the day it's just a good competent tank

>>64061774
Don't be daft! Wars are clearly determined by how cool the respective countries propaganda is!