>>64093765 (OP)
>>64093776
Unironically, why isn't Antonov building shitload of these?
>there's no use, they would get downed, blablabla
Useful for defense, as already stated in OP. Also, there's no area in the current frontline that would resist sending a hundred of those at the same time alongside the motorized troops and infantry for combined operations, and adding drones/wingman drones for the fun.
Sure, they'll lose twenty, but would deplete the enemy air defense that would run out of missiles. Manpads would have a field day though, that's true, but I suspect with flares and modern technologies, they would have better survivability than helicopters.
I understand they're fighting a war of defense and not offense, and don't want much casualties, but at some point a breach will have to be made. Better prepare it now. Drones won't cut it with their measly payloads.