>>64094769
I use a laser on most of my modern firearms retard
that's why I made this thread
is because if I adjust any of my laser beyond -0/+0 then it's useless past or before the point of the adjusted zero
static laser works fine for a pistol at 5 yards, these are meant to be used with night vision out to hundreds of yards and need to be zero'd like a scope
>>64094781 >retard discovers zeroing >makes thread complaining about it
Can you dress yourself and use the bathroom unassisted? How do you supposedly own guns but not understand how zeroing works?
but think about it for a second
why would you zero both your optics and your laser when you can take advantage of something perfectly accurate for only a certain point of range (optic) & have a static point that's mildly accurate for any range (laser)
>>64094897
because when you zero a laser you know where it's perfectly accurate and can estimate drop at different ranges with that knowledge
if you just slap it on a hand guard you dont even know if it's pointing straight and it could to left or right by 3 feet at 200y
